Networking · head to head
Eclipse Mosquitto vs Palo Alto Networks

Eclipse Mosquitto
Networking
Small, EPL-licensed MQTT broker that runs on hardware other brokers cannot
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Eclipse Mosquitto has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Eclipse Mosquitto there is no clustering: Mosquitto is a single process, so high availability means building your own failover and accepting session loss on switchover.; Palo Alto Networks enterprise-focused pricing model
- They diverge on capability: Eclipse Mosquitto covers MQTT 5.0 support, Palo Alto Networks covers Advanced threat prevention.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Eclipse Mosquitto and Palo Alto Networks actually diverge.
| Attribute | Eclipse Mosquitto | Palo Alto Networks |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | Open source, no licence fee | subscription |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Linux, Windows, macOS, Docker | Cloud, On-premises, Hybrid |
| Founded | Unknown | 2005 |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Networking).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Eclipse Mosquitto
- MQTT 5.0 support
- Very small footprint
- Bridging
- WebSockets listener
- Command line clients
- Dynamic security plugin
Only in Palo Alto Networks
- Advanced threat prevention
- Threat detection and response
- Cloud security
- Endpoint protection
- Network security
- API protection
- Incident response
- Threat intelligence
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Eclipse Mosquitto
- A home or building automation stack where the broker must run on the same small computer as everything elsenot Palo Alto Networks
- An industrial gateway that buffers local telemetry and bridges selected topics to a cloud brokernot Palo Alto Networks
- Local development and testing of MQTT clients without provisioning a cloud IoT servicenot Palo Alto Networks
- An air-gapped deployment where a broker with no licence server and no phone-home behaviour is a requirementnot Palo Alto Networks
Palo Alto Networks
- Enterprise network security and threat protectionnot Eclipse Mosquitto
- Cloud-native application protectionnot Eclipse Mosquitto
- Identity and access securitynot Eclipse Mosquitto
- Security operations and incident responsenot Eclipse Mosquitto
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Eclipse Mosquitto
- There is no clustering: Mosquitto is a single process, so high availability means building your own failover and accepting session loss on switchover.
- Persistence is a local file rather than a replicated store, so a disk failure or an unclean shutdown can lose retained messages and queued QoS traffic.
- Practical capacity is a few thousand concurrent clients on typical hardware, so a growing device fleet eventually forces a migration to a clustered broker.
- The Eclipse Public Licence is weak copyleft rather than permissive, which some legal teams treat as a blocker when embedding the broker in a shipped commercial product.
- There is no commercial support to buy from the project, so production incidents rely on community mailing lists or on paying a third party who happens to know the codebase.
Palo Alto Networks
- Enterprise-focused pricing model
- Complex implementation required
Pricing, plan by plan
Eclipse Mosquitto
Free- Eclipse MosquittoFree
- Eclipse Public License 2.0 with Eclipse Distribution Licence
- MQTT 5.0, 3.1.1 and 3.1
- No client or message limits beyond your hardware
Palo Alto Networks
On request- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Threat prevention
- Detection and response
- Cloud security
Which should you pick?
Choose Eclipse Mosquitto if
- You need mqtt 5.0 support.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Windows, macOS, Docker.
- You also want very small footprint.
Choose Palo Alto Networks if
- You need advanced threat prevention.
- You work on Cloud, On-premises, Hybrid.
- You also want threat detection and response.
Questions people ask
- Is Eclipse Mosquitto or Palo Alto Networks better?
- Neither clearly leads. Eclipse Mosquitto starts at Free and Palo Alto Networks at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Eclipse Mosquitto or Palo Alto Networks?
- Eclipse Mosquitto has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Eclipse Mosquitto and On request for Palo Alto Networks.
- Does Eclipse Mosquitto or Palo Alto Networks run on more platforms?
- Eclipse Mosquitto runs on Linux, Windows, macOS, Docker. Palo Alto Networks runs on Cloud, On-premises, Hybrid.
- Can I use Eclipse Mosquitto for free?
- Yes. Eclipse Mosquitto has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Palo Alto Networks starts at On request.
- What is Eclipse Mosquitto best used for?
- Eclipse Mosquitto is most often used for a home or building automation stack where the broker must run on the same small computer as everything else, an industrial gateway that buffers local telemetry and bridges selected topics to a cloud broker, local development and testing of mqtt clients without provisioning a cloud iot service, an air-gapped deployment where a broker with no licence server and no phone-home behaviour is a requirement. Of those, a home or building automation stack where the broker must run on the same small computer as everything else and an industrial gateway that buffers local telemetry and bridges selected topics to a cloud broker are not what Palo Alto Networks is typically brought in for.
- What can Eclipse Mosquitto do that Palo Alto Networks cannot?
- Eclipse Mosquitto covers MQTT 5.0 support, Very small footprint, Bridging, WebSockets listener. Palo Alto Networks covers Advanced threat prevention, Threat detection and response, Cloud security, Endpoint protection.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Eclipse Mosquitto: Can Mosquitto be clustered?
No. It is a single process. High availability requires an external failover arrangement you build yourself.
Palo Alto Networks: How much do Palo Alto Networks products cost?
Palo Alto Networks does not publish pricing on their main website. Customers must request a demo, trial, or contact their sales team directly to receive custom pricing based on specific security needs and deployment scale.
SourceEclipse Mosquitto: What licence is it?
Eclipse Public License 2.0 alongside the Eclipse Distribution License, a weak copyleft rather than a permissive licence.
Eclipse Mosquitto: How many clients can it handle?
A few thousand concurrent connections on ordinary hardware; beyond that, use a clustered broker.
Eclipse Mosquitto: Does it support MQTT 5?
Yes, along with 3.1.1 and 3.1.
Related pages
More on Eclipse Mosquitto
More on Palo Alto Networks
Other head to heads
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs HiveMQ
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Traefik
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs pfSense
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs OpenVPN
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Icinga
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Consul
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs LibreNMS
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Zabbix
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Nebula
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs MikroTik RouterOS
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs PRTG Network Monitor
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Netdata
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Catchpoint
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Ubiquiti UniFi
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Grafana
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Prometheus
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Cloudflare
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Tailscale
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Ivanti
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Auvik
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs ngrok
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Splunk
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Twingate
- Palo Alto Networks vs HiveMQ
- Palo Alto Networks vs Traefik
- Palo Alto Networks vs pfSense
- Palo Alto Networks vs OpenVPN
- Palo Alto Networks vs Icinga
- Palo Alto Networks vs Consul
- Palo Alto Networks vs LibreNMS
- Palo Alto Networks vs Zabbix
- Palo Alto Networks vs Nebula
- Palo Alto Networks vs MikroTik RouterOS
- Palo Alto Networks vs PRTG Network Monitor
- Palo Alto Networks vs Netdata
- Palo Alto Networks vs Catchpoint
- Palo Alto Networks vs Ubiquiti UniFi
- Palo Alto Networks vs Grafana
- Palo Alto Networks vs Prometheus
- Palo Alto Networks vs Cloudflare
- Palo Alto Networks vs Tailscale
- Palo Alto Networks vs Ivanti
- Palo Alto Networks vs Auvik
- Palo Alto Networks vs ngrok
- Palo Alto Networks vs Splunk
- Palo Alto Networks vs Twingate

