Networking · head to head
Eclipse Mosquitto vs ngrok

Eclipse Mosquitto
Networking
Small, EPL-licensed MQTT broker that runs on hardware other brokers cannot
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

ngrok
Networking
Reverse tunnel service that gives a local or private service a public URL without opening a firewall
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Eclipse Mosquitto there is no clustering: Mosquitto is a single process, so high availability means building your own failover and accepting session loss on switchover.; ngrok free HTTP endpoints show a browser interstitial before the page loads, which breaks first impressions in demos and confuses anyone you send the link to.
- They diverge on capability: Eclipse Mosquitto covers MQTT 5.0 support, ngrok covers Outbound agent tunnels.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Eclipse Mosquitto and ngrok actually diverge.
| Attribute | Eclipse Mosquitto | ngrok |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Open source, no licence fee | Per user per month |
| Platforms | Linux, Windows, macOS, Docker | Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker, Kubernetes |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Networking).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Eclipse Mosquitto
- MQTT 5.0 support
- Very small footprint
- Bridging
- WebSockets listener
- Command line clients
- Dynamic security plugin
Only in ngrok
- Outbound agent tunnels
- Static domains
- Traffic policy
- Request inspection
- Kubernetes ingress
- TCP and TLS endpoints
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Eclipse Mosquitto
- A home or building automation stack where the broker must run on the same small computer as everything elsenot ngrok
- An industrial gateway that buffers local telemetry and bridges selected topics to a cloud brokernot ngrok
- Local development and testing of MQTT clients without provisioning a cloud IoT servicenot ngrok
- An air-gapped deployment where a broker with no licence server and no phone-home behaviour is a requirementnot ngrok
ngrok
- Receiving webhooks from a payment or messaging provider on a laptop during developmentnot Eclipse Mosquitto
- Demonstrating a work in progress application to someone outside the network without deploying itnot Eclipse Mosquitto
- Publishing a service inside a private network or Kubernetes cluster without a public load balancernot Eclipse Mosquitto
- Giving a partner a temporary authenticated endpoint into an internal APInot Eclipse Mosquitto
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Eclipse Mosquitto
- There is no clustering: Mosquitto is a single process, so high availability means building your own failover and accepting session loss on switchover.
- Persistence is a local file rather than a replicated store, so a disk failure or an unclean shutdown can lose retained messages and queued QoS traffic.
- Practical capacity is a few thousand concurrent clients on typical hardware, so a growing device fleet eventually forces a migration to a clustered broker.
- The Eclipse Public Licence is weak copyleft rather than permissive, which some legal teams treat as a blocker when embedding the broker in a shipped commercial product.
- There is no commercial support to buy from the project, so production incidents rely on community mailing lists or on paying a third party who happens to know the codebase.
ngrok
- Free HTTP endpoints show a browser interstitial before the page loads, which breaks first impressions in demos and confuses anyone you send the link to.
- All traffic passes through ngrok infrastructure, so you inherit its latency and an ngrok incident takes every published endpoint down at once with no local failover.
- Pricing is per user seat plus allowances, so a platform team publishing many endpoints ends up buying seats for people who never open the dashboard.
- Bandwidth is metered on paid tiers, so a workload that quietly grows into serving real traffic produces overage rather than a flat bill.
- Traffic policy configuration is specific to ngrok, so the authentication and routing logic you accumulate at the edge has to be rebuilt if you later move to a conventional ingress.
Pricing, plan by plan
Eclipse Mosquitto
Free- Eclipse MosquittoFree
- Eclipse Public License 2.0 with Eclipse Distribution Licence
- MQTT 5.0, 3.1.1 and 3.1
- No client or message limits beyond your hardware
ngrok
Free- FreeFree
- One static domain
- HTTP endpoints with a browser interstitial
- Limited simultaneous connections
- Personal$undefined/month
- Removes the interstitial warning page
- Additional reserved domains
- TCP endpoints
- Pro$undefined/month
- Per user billing with team accounts
- Traffic policy rules and edge authentication
- Higher bandwidth allowances
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Custom terms and volume pricing
- Dedicated capacity options
- Compliance and audit requirements
Which should you pick?
Choose Eclipse Mosquitto if
- You need mqtt 5.0 support.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Windows, macOS, Docker.
- You also want very small footprint.
Choose ngrok if
- You need outbound agent tunnels.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker, Kubernetes.
- You also want static domains.
Questions people ask
- Is Eclipse Mosquitto or ngrok better?
- Neither clearly leads. Eclipse Mosquitto starts at Free and ngrok at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Eclipse Mosquitto or ngrok?
- Eclipse Mosquitto starts at Free and ngrok at Free.
- Does Eclipse Mosquitto or ngrok run on more platforms?
- Eclipse Mosquitto runs on Linux, Windows, macOS, Docker. ngrok runs on Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker, Kubernetes.
- Can I use Eclipse Mosquitto for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Eclipse Mosquitto best used for?
- Eclipse Mosquitto is most often used for a home or building automation stack where the broker must run on the same small computer as everything else, an industrial gateway that buffers local telemetry and bridges selected topics to a cloud broker, local development and testing of mqtt clients without provisioning a cloud iot service, an air-gapped deployment where a broker with no licence server and no phone-home behaviour is a requirement. Of those, a home or building automation stack where the broker must run on the same small computer as everything else and an industrial gateway that buffers local telemetry and bridges selected topics to a cloud broker are not what ngrok is typically brought in for.
- What can Eclipse Mosquitto do that ngrok cannot?
- Eclipse Mosquitto covers MQTT 5.0 support, Very small footprint, Bridging, WebSockets listener. ngrok covers Outbound agent tunnels, Static domains, Traffic policy, Request inspection.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Eclipse Mosquitto: Can Mosquitto be clustered?
No. It is a single process. High availability requires an external failover arrangement you build yourself.
ngrok: Can I use it in production?
It is sold for that now, with static domains, policy rules and a Kubernetes operator. The question is whether you accept a third party on the traffic path for every request.
Eclipse Mosquitto: What licence is it?
Eclipse Public License 2.0 alongside the Eclipse Distribution License, a weak copyleft rather than a permissive licence.
ngrok: Why does my free URL show a warning page?
Free HTTP endpoints carry an interstitial. Removing it requires a paid plan, and it is the most common reason people upgrade.
Eclipse Mosquitto: How many clients can it handle?
A few thousand concurrent connections on ordinary hardware; beyond that, use a clustered broker.
ngrok: Does it work for SSH or a database?
Yes through TCP endpoints, which are a paid feature.
Eclipse Mosquitto: Does it support MQTT 5?
Yes, along with 3.1.1 and 3.1.
ngrok: What is the self hosted alternative?
A reverse proxy on a server you own with a tunnel back to the service, or one of the self hosted tunnel projects. All of them cost more setup time than the thing they replace.
Related pages
More on Eclipse Mosquitto
Other head to heads
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs HiveMQ
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Traefik
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs pfSense
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs OpenVPN
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Icinga
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Consul
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs LibreNMS
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Zabbix
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Nebula
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs MikroTik RouterOS
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs PRTG Network Monitor
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Netdata
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Catchpoint
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Ubiquiti UniFi
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Cloudflare
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Twingate
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Cisco Meraki
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Kentik
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Tailscale
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Auvik
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs ThousandEyes
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs ZeroTier
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Juniper Mist
- ngrok vs HiveMQ
- ngrok vs Traefik
- ngrok vs pfSense
- ngrok vs OpenVPN
- ngrok vs Icinga
- ngrok vs Consul
- ngrok vs LibreNMS
- ngrok vs Zabbix
- ngrok vs Nebula
- ngrok vs MikroTik RouterOS
- ngrok vs PRTG Network Monitor
- ngrok vs Netdata
- ngrok vs Catchpoint
- ngrok vs Ubiquiti UniFi
- ngrok vs Cloudflare
- ngrok vs Twingate
- ngrok vs Cisco Meraki
- ngrok vs Kentik
- ngrok vs Tailscale
- ngrok vs Auvik
- ngrok vs ThousandEyes
- ngrok vs ZeroTier
- ngrok vs Juniper Mist
