Softwr

Network & Connectivity · head to head

Consul vs Palo Alto Networks

Consul logo

Consul

Network & Connectivity

Service discovery, networking, and security

From
Free
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite
Palo Alto Networks logo

Palo Alto Networks

Network & Connectivity

Enterprise cybersecurity platform

From
On request
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite

The short version

  • Only Consul has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
  • Each has a real cost: Consul namespaces, admin partitions and other multi tenancy controls are Consul Enterprise only; Palo Alto Networks enterprise-focused pricing model
  • They diverge on capability: Consul covers Service discovery, Palo Alto Networks covers Advanced threat prevention.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Consul and Palo Alto Networks actually diverge.

Attributes where Consul and Palo Alto Networks differ
AttributeConsulPalo Alto Networks
Starting priceFreeOn request
Pricing modelopen-sourcesubscription
Free tierYesNo
PlatformsLinux, Windows, Mac, CloudCloud, On-premises, Hybrid
Founded20142005

Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Network & Connectivity).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Consul

  • Service discovery
  • Health checking
  • Key/value store
  • Multi-datacenter
  • DNS interface
  • Service mesh
  • Load balancing
  • Configuration management

Only in Palo Alto Networks

  • Advanced threat prevention
  • Threat detection and response
  • Cloud security
  • Endpoint protection
  • Network security
  • API protection
  • Incident response
  • Threat intelligence

Both cover

  • On-premise deployment
  • Cloud deployment
  • Hybrid deployment

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Consul

  • Service discovery and health checking across dynamic infrastructurenot Palo Alto Networks
  • Running a service mesh with mutual TLS between servicesnot Palo Alto Networks
  • Distributed key value configuration storage for applicationsnot Palo Alto Networks

Palo Alto Networks

  • Enterprise network security and threat protectionnot Consul
  • Cloud-native application protectionnot Consul
  • Identity and access securitynot Consul
  • Security operations and incident responsenot Consul

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Consul

  • Namespaces, admin partitions and other multi tenancy controls are Consul Enterprise only
  • Audit logging, OIDC authentication and FIPS 140-2 builds require Consul Enterprise, so compliance driven deployments cannot use the free edition
  • Automated backups, redundancy zones, read replicas and automated server upgrades are Enterprise only
  • Long Term Support releases are Enterprise only, so community users must upgrade to stay supported
  • Service mesh and advanced traffic management sit in the Premium Enterprise tier above Standard Enterprise
  • HashiCorp does not publish a Consul rate on its pricing page, which lists per resource prices for Terraform instead

Palo Alto Networks

  • Enterprise-focused pricing model
  • Complex implementation required

Pricing, plan by plan

Consul

Free
  • Open SourceFree
    • Service discovery
    • Health checking
    • KV store

Palo Alto Networks

On request
  • Enterprise$undefined/year
    • Threat prevention
    • Detection and response
    • Cloud security

Which should you pick?

Choose Consul if

  • You need service discovery.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You work on Linux, Windows, Mac, Cloud.
  • You also want health checking.
Consul review

Choose Palo Alto Networks if

  • You need advanced threat prevention.
  • You work on Cloud, On-premises, Hybrid.
  • You also want threat detection and response.
Palo Alto Networks review

Questions people ask

Is Consul or Palo Alto Networks better?
Neither clearly leads. Consul starts at Free and Palo Alto Networks at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Consul or Palo Alto Networks?
Consul has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Consul and On request for Palo Alto Networks.
Does Consul or Palo Alto Networks run on more platforms?
Consul runs on Linux, Windows, Mac, Cloud. Palo Alto Networks runs on Cloud, On-premises, Hybrid.
Can I use Consul for free?
Yes. Consul has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Palo Alto Networks starts at On request.
What is Consul best used for?
Consul is most often used for service discovery and health checking across dynamic infrastructure, running a service mesh with mutual tls between services, distributed key value configuration storage for applications. Of those, service discovery and health checking across dynamic infrastructure and running a service mesh with mutual tls between services are not what Palo Alto Networks is typically brought in for.
What can Consul do that Palo Alto Networks cannot?
Consul covers Service discovery, Health checking, Key/value store, Multi-datacenter. Palo Alto Networks covers Advanced threat prevention, Threat detection and response, Cloud security, Endpoint protection. Both handle On-premise deployment, Cloud deployment, Hybrid deployment.
ShareXLinkedInRedditWhatsAppEmail

Related pages

More on Consul

More on Palo Alto Networks

Keep looking

Other head to heads