Networking · head to head
Eclipse Mosquitto vs Twingate

Eclipse Mosquitto
Networking
Small, EPL-licensed MQTT broker that runs on hardware other brokers cannot
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Twingate
Networking
Zero trust remote access that publishes individual resources instead of a network
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Eclipse Mosquitto there is no clustering: Mosquitto is a single process, so high availability means building your own failover and accepting session loss on switchover.; Twingate the control plane is proprietary and hosted, so it cannot be run inside your own boundary and a vendor outage prevents new connections from being established even though the connectors are yours.
- They diverge on capability: Eclipse Mosquitto covers MQTT 5.0 support, Twingate covers Outbound only connectors.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Eclipse Mosquitto and Twingate actually diverge.
| Attribute | Eclipse Mosquitto | Twingate |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Open source, no licence fee | Per user per month |
| Platforms | Linux, Windows, macOS, Docker | Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android, Docker |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Networking).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Eclipse Mosquitto
- MQTT 5.0 support
- Very small footprint
- Bridging
- WebSockets listener
- Command line clients
- Dynamic security plugin
Only in Twingate
- Outbound only connectors
- Per resource access
- Identity provider integration
- Device posture checks
- Split routing
- Access logging
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Eclipse Mosquitto
- A home or building automation stack where the broker must run on the same small computer as everything elsenot Twingate
- An industrial gateway that buffers local telemetry and bridges selected topics to a cloud brokernot Twingate
- Local development and testing of MQTT clients without provisioning a cloud IoT servicenot Twingate
- An air-gapped deployment where a broker with no licence server and no phone-home behaviour is a requirementnot Twingate
Twingate
- Retiring a VPN concentrator that grants whole network access to anyone who authenticatesnot Eclipse Mosquitto
- Giving contractors access to two internal applications without putting them on the corporate networknot Eclipse Mosquitto
- Reaching private cloud resources across several accounts without building peering and bastion hostsnot Eclipse Mosquitto
- Producing per user access logs for an audit that a network level VPN cannot supplynot Eclipse Mosquitto
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Eclipse Mosquitto
- There is no clustering: Mosquitto is a single process, so high availability means building your own failover and accepting session loss on switchover.
- Persistence is a local file rather than a replicated store, so a disk failure or an unclean shutdown can lose retained messages and queued QoS traffic.
- Practical capacity is a few thousand concurrent clients on typical hardware, so a growing device fleet eventually forces a migration to a clustered broker.
- The Eclipse Public Licence is weak copyleft rather than permissive, which some legal teams treat as a blocker when embedding the broker in a shipped commercial product.
- There is no commercial support to buy from the project, so production incidents rely on community mailing lists or on paying a third party who happens to know the codebase.
Twingate
- The control plane is proprietary and hosted, so it cannot be run inside your own boundary and a vendor outage prevents new connections from being established even though the connectors are yours.
- Every device needs the client installed and running, so unmanaged machines, appliances and third parties who will not install software are awkward to accommodate.
- Pricing is per user per month, so an organisation with many occasional contractors pays full seats for accounts that connect twice a month.
- Connections are client initiated, so server initiated flows back to a user device, and protocols that need arbitrary inbound reachability, do not fit the model.
- It replaces remote access but not site to site networking, so an organisation that also needs offices and datacentres meshed together still runs a second network product alongside it.
Pricing, plan by plan
Eclipse Mosquitto
Free- Eclipse MosquittoFree
- Eclipse Public License 2.0 with Eclipse Distribution Licence
- MQTT 5.0, 3.1.1 and 3.1
- No client or message limits beyond your hardware
Twingate
Free- StarterFree
- Small number of users
- Limited remote networks
- Community support
- Business$undefined/month
- Per user per month billing
- Device posture checks
- Identity provider group sync
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Custom terms and volume pricing
- Advanced controls and support commitments
- Dedicated onboarding
Which should you pick?
Choose Eclipse Mosquitto if
- You need mqtt 5.0 support.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Windows, macOS, Docker.
- You also want very small footprint.
Choose Twingate if
- You need outbound only connectors.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android, Docker.
- You also want per resource access.
Questions people ask
- Is Eclipse Mosquitto or Twingate better?
- Neither clearly leads. Eclipse Mosquitto starts at Free and Twingate at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Eclipse Mosquitto or Twingate?
- Eclipse Mosquitto starts at Free and Twingate at Free.
- Does Eclipse Mosquitto or Twingate run on more platforms?
- Eclipse Mosquitto runs on Linux, Windows, macOS, Docker. Twingate runs on Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android, Docker.
- Can I use Eclipse Mosquitto for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Eclipse Mosquitto best used for?
- Eclipse Mosquitto is most often used for a home or building automation stack where the broker must run on the same small computer as everything else, an industrial gateway that buffers local telemetry and bridges selected topics to a cloud broker, local development and testing of mqtt clients without provisioning a cloud iot service, an air-gapped deployment where a broker with no licence server and no phone-home behaviour is a requirement. Of those, a home or building automation stack where the broker must run on the same small computer as everything else and an industrial gateway that buffers local telemetry and bridges selected topics to a cloud broker are not what Twingate is typically brought in for.
- What can Eclipse Mosquitto do that Twingate cannot?
- Eclipse Mosquitto covers MQTT 5.0 support, Very small footprint, Bridging, WebSockets listener. Twingate covers Outbound only connectors, Per resource access, Identity provider integration, Device posture checks.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Eclipse Mosquitto: Can Mosquitto be clustered?
No. It is a single process. High availability requires an external failover arrangement you build yourself.
Twingate: Can I self host it?
No. Connectors run in your network but the control plane is a hosted service, which is the main structural difference from the open source mesh tools.
Eclipse Mosquitto: What licence is it?
Eclipse Public License 2.0 alongside the Eclipse Distribution License, a weak copyleft rather than a permissive licence.
Twingate: Does it replace a site to site VPN?
No. It is remote access from users to resources. Connecting networks to each other is a different product category.
Eclipse Mosquitto: How many clients can it handle?
A few thousand concurrent connections on ordinary hardware; beyond that, use a clustered broker.
Twingate: What happens if Twingate is unavailable?
Established sessions may continue, but new connections depend on the hosted service to broker them, so plan a break glass path for administrators.
Eclipse Mosquitto: Does it support MQTT 5?
Yes, along with 3.1.1 and 3.1.
Twingate: Is the free tier usable for a small team?
For a handful of users and a small number of remote networks, yes. Group based policies and posture checks are the practical reason to move up.
Related pages
More on Eclipse Mosquitto
Other head to heads
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs HiveMQ
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Traefik
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs pfSense
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs OpenVPN
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Icinga
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Consul
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs LibreNMS
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Zabbix
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Nebula
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs MikroTik RouterOS
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs PRTG Network Monitor
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Netdata
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Catchpoint
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Ubiquiti UniFi
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs NetBird
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Tailscale
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Domotz
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs ngrok
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Auvik
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Cisco Meraki
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs Kentik
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs OPNsense
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs ThousandEyes
- Eclipse Mosquitto vs ZeroTier
- Twingate vs HiveMQ
- Twingate vs Traefik
- Twingate vs pfSense
- Twingate vs OpenVPN
- Twingate vs Icinga
- Twingate vs Consul
- Twingate vs LibreNMS
- Twingate vs Zabbix
- Twingate vs Nebula
- Twingate vs MikroTik RouterOS
- Twingate vs PRTG Network Monitor
- Twingate vs Netdata
- Twingate vs Catchpoint
- Twingate vs Ubiquiti UniFi
- Twingate vs NetBird
- Twingate vs Tailscale
- Twingate vs Domotz
- Twingate vs ngrok
- Twingate vs Auvik
- Twingate vs Cisco Meraki
- Twingate vs Kentik
- Twingate vs OPNsense
- Twingate vs ThousandEyes
- Twingate vs ZeroTier
