Networking · head to head
Palo Alto Networks vs Twingate

Twingate
Networking
Zero trust remote access that publishes individual resources instead of a network
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Twingate has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Palo Alto Networks enterprise-focused pricing model; Twingate the control plane is proprietary and hosted, so it cannot be run inside your own boundary and a vendor outage prevents new connections from being established even though the connectors are yours.
- They diverge on capability: Palo Alto Networks covers Advanced threat prevention, Twingate covers Outbound only connectors.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Palo Alto Networks and Twingate actually diverge.
| Attribute | Palo Alto Networks | Twingate |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | Free |
| Pricing model | subscription | Per user per month |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Cloud, On-premises, Hybrid | Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android, Docker |
| Founded | 2005 | Unknown |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Networking).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Palo Alto Networks
- Advanced threat prevention
- Threat detection and response
- Cloud security
- Endpoint protection
- Network security
- API protection
- Incident response
- Threat intelligence
Only in Twingate
- Outbound only connectors
- Per resource access
- Identity provider integration
- Device posture checks
- Split routing
- Access logging
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Palo Alto Networks
- Enterprise network security and threat protectionnot Twingate
- Cloud-native application protectionnot Twingate
- Identity and access securitynot Twingate
- Security operations and incident responsenot Twingate
Twingate
- Retiring a VPN concentrator that grants whole network access to anyone who authenticatesnot Palo Alto Networks
- Giving contractors access to two internal applications without putting them on the corporate networknot Palo Alto Networks
- Reaching private cloud resources across several accounts without building peering and bastion hostsnot Palo Alto Networks
- Producing per user access logs for an audit that a network level VPN cannot supplynot Palo Alto Networks
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Palo Alto Networks
- Enterprise-focused pricing model
- Complex implementation required
Twingate
- The control plane is proprietary and hosted, so it cannot be run inside your own boundary and a vendor outage prevents new connections from being established even though the connectors are yours.
- Every device needs the client installed and running, so unmanaged machines, appliances and third parties who will not install software are awkward to accommodate.
- Pricing is per user per month, so an organisation with many occasional contractors pays full seats for accounts that connect twice a month.
- Connections are client initiated, so server initiated flows back to a user device, and protocols that need arbitrary inbound reachability, do not fit the model.
- It replaces remote access but not site to site networking, so an organisation that also needs offices and datacentres meshed together still runs a second network product alongside it.
Pricing, plan by plan
Palo Alto Networks
On request- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Threat prevention
- Detection and response
- Cloud security
Twingate
Free- StarterFree
- Small number of users
- Limited remote networks
- Community support
- Business$undefined/month
- Per user per month billing
- Device posture checks
- Identity provider group sync
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Custom terms and volume pricing
- Advanced controls and support commitments
- Dedicated onboarding
Which should you pick?
Choose Palo Alto Networks if
- You need advanced threat prevention.
- You work on Cloud, On-premises, Hybrid.
- You also want threat detection and response.
Choose Twingate if
- You need outbound only connectors.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android, Docker.
- You also want per resource access.
Questions people ask
- Is Palo Alto Networks or Twingate better?
- Neither clearly leads. Palo Alto Networks starts at On request and Twingate at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Palo Alto Networks or Twingate?
- Twingate has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Palo Alto Networks and Free for Twingate.
- Does Palo Alto Networks or Twingate run on more platforms?
- Palo Alto Networks runs on Cloud, On-premises, Hybrid. Twingate runs on Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android, Docker.
- Can I use Twingate for free?
- Yes. Twingate has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Palo Alto Networks starts at On request.
- What is Palo Alto Networks best used for?
- Palo Alto Networks is most often used for enterprise network security and threat protection, cloud-native application protection, identity and access security, security operations and incident response. Of those, enterprise network security and threat protection and cloud-native application protection are not what Twingate is typically brought in for.
- What can Palo Alto Networks do that Twingate cannot?
- Palo Alto Networks covers Advanced threat prevention, Threat detection and response, Cloud security, Endpoint protection. Twingate covers Outbound only connectors, Per resource access, Identity provider integration, Device posture checks.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Palo Alto Networks: How much do Palo Alto Networks products cost?
Palo Alto Networks does not publish pricing on their main website. Customers must request a demo, trial, or contact their sales team directly to receive custom pricing based on specific security needs and deployment scale.
SourceTwingate: Can I self host it?
No. Connectors run in your network but the control plane is a hosted service, which is the main structural difference from the open source mesh tools.
Twingate: Does it replace a site to site VPN?
No. It is remote access from users to resources. Connecting networks to each other is a different product category.
Twingate: What happens if Twingate is unavailable?
Established sessions may continue, but new connections depend on the hosted service to broker them, so plan a break glass path for administrators.
Twingate: Is the free tier usable for a small team?
For a handful of users and a small number of remote networks, yes. Group based policies and posture checks are the practical reason to move up.
Related pages
More on Palo Alto Networks
Other head to heads
- Palo Alto Networks vs Grafana
- Palo Alto Networks vs Prometheus
- Palo Alto Networks vs Cloudflare
- Palo Alto Networks vs Consul
- Palo Alto Networks vs Tailscale
- Palo Alto Networks vs Ivanti
- Palo Alto Networks vs Auvik
- Palo Alto Networks vs Catchpoint
- Palo Alto Networks vs Icinga
- Palo Alto Networks vs Ubiquiti UniFi
- Palo Alto Networks vs Zabbix
- Palo Alto Networks vs HiveMQ
- Palo Alto Networks vs ngrok
- Palo Alto Networks vs Splunk
- Palo Alto Networks vs LibreNMS
- Palo Alto Networks vs OpenVPN
- Palo Alto Networks vs NetBird
- Palo Alto Networks vs Domotz
- Palo Alto Networks vs PRTG Network Monitor
- Palo Alto Networks vs Cisco Meraki
- Palo Alto Networks vs Kentik
- Palo Alto Networks vs OPNsense
- Palo Alto Networks vs Netdata
- Palo Alto Networks vs ThousandEyes
- Palo Alto Networks vs Traefik
- Palo Alto Networks vs ZeroTier
- Twingate vs Grafana
- Twingate vs Prometheus
- Twingate vs Cloudflare
- Twingate vs Consul
- Twingate vs Tailscale
- Twingate vs Ivanti
- Twingate vs Auvik
- Twingate vs Catchpoint
- Twingate vs Icinga
- Twingate vs Ubiquiti UniFi
- Twingate vs Zabbix
- Twingate vs HiveMQ
- Twingate vs ngrok
- Twingate vs Splunk
- Twingate vs LibreNMS
- Twingate vs OpenVPN
- Twingate vs NetBird
- Twingate vs Domotz
- Twingate vs PRTG Network Monitor
- Twingate vs Cisco Meraki
- Twingate vs Kentik
- Twingate vs OPNsense
- Twingate vs Netdata
- Twingate vs ThousandEyes
- Twingate vs Traefik
- Twingate vs ZeroTier

