Databases · head to head
Memcached vs RavenDB
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Memcached no persistence at all: restart a node and its cache is gone, which every design must assume; RavenDB the free Developer licence bars commercial use and expires every 6 months, requiring renewal
- They diverge on capability: Memcached covers In-memory key-value cache, RavenDB covers ACID Transactions.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Memcached and RavenDB actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Databases).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Memcached
- In-memory key-value cache
- Multithreaded
- Client-side sharding
- Predictable memory use
Only in RavenDB
- ACID Transactions
- Auto-indexing
- Full-text Search
- Graph Queries
- Distributed Counters
- Time Series
- Document Compression
- .NET
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Memcached
- Caching expensive database query results to cut loadnot RavenDB
- Session storage where losing sessions on restart is acceptablenot RavenDB
- Fronting an API whose responses are costly and change slowlynot RavenDB
RavenDB
- Running a distributed document database with ACID transactionsnot Memcached
- Self hosting a multi node database cluster on your own hardwarenot Memcached
- Replicating operational data out to analytics systems through ETLnot Memcached
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Memcached
- No persistence at all: restart a node and its cache is gone, which every design must assume
- No replication or failover, so losing a node loses that share of the cache
- Only simple key-value, with none of the lists, sorted sets or streams Redis offers
- Values are capped at 1MB by default, which surprises teams caching large documents
RavenDB
- The free Developer licence bars commercial use and expires every 6 months, requiring renewal
- The free Community licence caps a customer at 60 cores and forces you to stay on the latest major version
- The Professional licence is limited to a single database, a 5 node cluster, 40 cores and 240 GB RAM
- Sharding across nodes, ETL to OLAP, Elasticsearch and Kafka, and data archival are Enterprise only
- Enterprise and AI licence pricing is contact us only with no published rate
Pricing, plan by plan
Memcached
Free- MemcachedFree
- Full functionality
- Self-hosted
- No usage limits
RavenDB
Free- CommunityFree
- 3 cores
- 6GB RAM
- Community support
- Professional$499/year
- Production use
- Professional support
- Advanced features
Which should you pick?
Choose Memcached if
- You need in-memory key-value cache.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker, Self-hosted.
- You also want multithreaded.
Choose RavenDB if
- You need acid transactions.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Windows, Mac, Docker, Web.
- You also want auto-indexing.
Questions people ask
- Is Memcached or RavenDB better?
- Neither clearly leads. Memcached starts at Free and RavenDB at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Memcached or RavenDB?
- Memcached starts at Free and RavenDB at Free.
- Does Memcached or RavenDB run on more platforms?
- Memcached runs on Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker, Self-hosted. RavenDB runs on Linux, Windows, Mac, Docker, Web.
- Can I use Memcached for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Memcached best used for?
- Memcached is most often used for caching expensive database query results to cut load, session storage where losing sessions on restart is acceptable, fronting an api whose responses are costly and change slowly. Of those, caching expensive database query results to cut load and session storage where losing sessions on restart is acceptable are not what RavenDB is typically brought in for.
- What can Memcached do that RavenDB cannot?
- Memcached covers In-memory key-value cache, Multithreaded, Client-side sharding, Predictable memory use. RavenDB covers ACID Transactions, Auto-indexing, Full-text Search, Graph Queries.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Memcached: Is Memcached free?
Yes, open source with no licence fee.
RavenDB: Is RavenDB free or open source?
RavenDB is open source under the AGPLv3 license and available on GitHub. It also offers a free developer license with enterprise-level features limited to 9 cores, 36GB max RAM, 3 nodes, and non-commercial use.
SourceMemcached: Memcached or Redis?
Memcached is a pure cache: simpler, multithreaded and very predictable. Redis adds persistence, replication and rich data structures, which is why it is the default choice unless you specifically want a cache and nothing more.
RavenDB: Can I use RavenDB commercially for free?
RavenDB offers a free Community License that permits commercial deployment with unlimited databases and sizes, subject to a 60-core maximum per customer and requirement to run the latest major version.
SourceMemcached: Does Memcached persist data?
No. Everything is in memory and lost on restart, by design.
RavenDB: What commercial licensing options does RavenDB offer?
RavenDB offers Professional, Enterprise, and AI tiers for commercial use. Pricing for these tiers requires contacting their sales team at [email protected].
SourceRavenDB: Does RavenDB offer a cloud hosting option?
RavenDB Cloud provides a fully managed cloud database with maintenance, failover, and backups included. Pricing is available at cloud.ravendb.net/pricing.
SourceRavenDB: Is there a refund window if I purchase RavenDB?
RavenDB offers a 30-day refund window for purchased licenses.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Memcached vs Dragonfly
- Memcached vs Valkey
- Memcached vs Readyset
- Memcached vs PostgreSQL
- Memcached vs DuckDB
- Memcached vs DynamoDB
- Memcached vs NATS
- Memcached vs Apache Pulsar
- Memcached vs Presto
- Memcached vs Timeplus
- Memcached vs RabbitMQ
- Memcached vs EMQX
- Memcached vs FaunaDB
- Memcached vs Firebase Realtime Database
- Memcached vs MotherDuck
- Memcached vs Neo4j
- Memcached vs Apache Kafka
- Memcached vs Firestore
- Memcached vs Airtable
- Memcached vs Cockroach Labs
- Memcached vs Amazon Aurora
- Memcached vs CouchDB
- Memcached vs ArangoDB
- Memcached vs Couchbase
- Memcached vs DataGrip
- Memcached vs ScyllaDB
- Memcached vs Dremio
- Memcached vs Fivetran HVR
- Memcached vs Grist
- Memcached vs IBM Db2
- Memcached vs Instaclustr
- Memcached vs Cassandra
- RavenDB vs Dragonfly
- RavenDB vs Valkey
- RavenDB vs Readyset
- RavenDB vs PostgreSQL
- RavenDB vs DuckDB
- RavenDB vs DynamoDB
- RavenDB vs NATS
- RavenDB vs Apache Pulsar
- RavenDB vs Presto
- RavenDB vs Timeplus
- RavenDB vs RabbitMQ
- RavenDB vs EMQX
- RavenDB vs FaunaDB
- RavenDB vs Firebase Realtime Database
- RavenDB vs MotherDuck
- RavenDB vs Neo4j
- RavenDB vs Apache Kafka
- RavenDB vs Firestore
- RavenDB vs Airtable
- RavenDB vs Cockroach Labs
- RavenDB vs Amazon Aurora
- RavenDB vs CouchDB
- RavenDB vs ArangoDB
- RavenDB vs Couchbase
- RavenDB vs DataGrip
- RavenDB vs ScyllaDB
- RavenDB vs Dremio
- RavenDB vs Fivetran HVR
- RavenDB vs Grist
- RavenDB vs IBM Db2
- RavenDB vs Instaclustr
- RavenDB vs Cassandra

