Logistics · head to head
McLeod Software vs Uber

McLeod Software
Logistics
The long standing transportation management system for North American asset carriers and brokerages
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Uber
Logistics
We reimagine the way the world moves for the better
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: McLeod Software it is a Microsoft SQL Server application that most customers still run on their own servers, so the total cost includes hardware, database administration and a disaster recovery plan that the vendor does not provide.; Uber the vendor's About page publishes no fare, commission or fee structure, pointing users to individual service pages or the app instead
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which McLeod Software and Uber actually diverge.
| Attribute | McLeod Software | Uber |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | quote | transaction |
| Platforms | Windows, Web, iOS, Android | Web |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Logistics).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in McLeod Software
- LoadMaster
- PowerBroker
- Driver pay and settlements
- EDI and integration
- Document Power imaging
- Business intelligence
Only in Uber
Nothing recorded that McLeod Software does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
McLeod Software
- A truckload carrier above one hundred trucks whose driver pay rules break every simpler system it has triednot Uber
- A brokerage that needs carrier payables, factoring interfaces and settlement controls rather than a load board with invoicingnot Uber
- A carrier required by large shippers to exchange EDI tenders, status messages and invoices in specific formatsnot Uber
- A company running both assets and a brokerage that wants each side on the vendor system built for itnot Uber
Uber
No use cases recorded yet. See the Uber review.
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
McLeod Software
- It is a Microsoft SQL Server application that most customers still run on their own servers, so the total cost includes hardware, database administration and a disaster recovery plan that the vendor does not provide.
- Version upgrades are projects rather than background events, and carriers routinely run releases that are a year or more old because upgrading requires testing every customisation and integration.
- Licensing is per seat with modules priced separately, so a carrier with part time weekend dispatchers or occasional finance users pays full seats for people who log in a few hours a week.
- The interface is dense and built for trained operators, and onboarding a new dispatcher takes weeks rather than days, which is expensive in a role with high turnover.
- Pricing is never published and implementations commonly run six months or more with vendor or partner services, so the first year cost is a multiple of the annual licence and difficult to estimate before a sales process.
Uber
- The vendor's About page publishes no fare, commission or fee structure, pointing users to individual service pages or the app instead
- Freight and Health offerings are separate products bundled under the Uber brand rather than available through the standard rider app
Pricing, plan by plan
McLeod Software
On request- LoadMaster$undefined/year
- Asset carrier transportation management
- Driver pay and settlements
- Dispatch and equipment management
- PowerBroker$undefined/year
- Brokerage operations
- Carrier procurement and payables
- Customer billing
Uber
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Uber review.
Which should you pick?
Choose McLeod Software if
- You need loadmaster.
- You work on Windows, Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want powerbroker.
Choose Uber if
Nothing in the data separates Uber from McLeod Software on the points above - pick on price and on how each one feels to use.
Questions people ask
- Is McLeod Software or Uber better?
- Neither clearly leads. McLeod Software starts at On request and Uber at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, McLeod Software or Uber?
- McLeod Software starts at On request and Uber at On request.
- Does McLeod Software or Uber run on more platforms?
- McLeod Software runs on Windows, Web, iOS, Android. Uber runs on Web.
- What is McLeod Software best used for?
- McLeod Software is most often used for a truckload carrier above one hundred trucks whose driver pay rules break every simpler system it has tried, a brokerage that needs carrier payables, factoring interfaces and settlement controls rather than a load board with invoicing, a carrier required by large shippers to exchange edi tenders, status messages and invoices in specific formats, a company running both assets and a brokerage that wants each side on the vendor system built for it. Of those, a truckload carrier above one hundred trucks whose driver pay rules break every simpler system it has tried and a brokerage that needs carrier payables, factoring interfaces and settlement controls rather than a load board with invoicing are not what Uber is typically brought in for.
- What can McLeod Software do that Uber cannot?
- McLeod Software covers LoadMaster, PowerBroker, Driver pay and settlements, EDI and integration.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
McLeod Software: Is McLeod available as a hosted service?
Yes, McLeod offers hosting, but a large part of the installed base still runs on premises and budgets accordingly.
McLeod Software: Can a fifty truck carrier use it?
It will run, but the licence and implementation economics rarely make sense below roughly one hundred trucks.
McLeod Software: Who owns McLeod Software?
It has remained privately held and independent since it was founded in 1985, which is unusual in this market.
McLeod Software: How long is a typical implementation?
Plan for six months or more once data migration, EDI setup and settlement rule configuration are included.
Related pages
More on McLeod Software
Other head to heads
- McLeod Software vs Trimble TMW.Suite
- McLeod Software vs Descartes Aljex
- McLeod Software vs CargoWise
- McLeod Software vs Turvo
- McLeod Software vs Alvys
- McLeod Software vs Truckbase
- McLeod Software vs Trucker Path
- McLeod Software vs Rose Rocket
- McLeod Software vs Manhattan Associates
- McLeod Software vs Alpega
- McLeod Software vs Transfix
- McLeod Software vs Transporeon
- McLeod Software vs Descartes MacroPoint
- McLeod Software vs Descartes Systems
- McLeod Software vs Deliverr
- McLeod Software vs AfterShip
- McLeod Software vs Cargoson
- McLeod Software vs CWILL Post-Purchase
- McLeod Software vs Detrack
- McLeod Software vs Onfleet
- McLeod Software vs Locate2u
- McLeod Software vs Softeon
- McLeod Software vs Blue Yonder
- McLeod Software vs Freightview
- McLeod Software vs EasyPost
- McLeod Software vs Easyship
- McLeod Software vs Kuebix
- Uber vs Trimble TMW.Suite
- Uber vs Descartes Aljex
- Uber vs CargoWise
- Uber vs Turvo
- Uber vs Alvys
- Uber vs Truckbase
- Uber vs Trucker Path
- Uber vs Rose Rocket
- Uber vs Manhattan Associates
- Uber vs Alpega
- Uber vs Transfix
- Uber vs Transporeon
- Uber vs Descartes MacroPoint
- Uber vs Descartes Systems
- Uber vs Deliverr
- Uber vs AfterShip
- Uber vs Cargoson
- Uber vs CWILL Post-Purchase
- Uber vs Detrack
- Uber vs Onfleet
- Uber vs Locate2u
- Uber vs Softeon
- Uber vs Blue Yonder
- Uber vs Freightview
- Uber vs EasyPost
- Uber vs Easyship
- Uber vs Kuebix
