Logistics · head to head
Descartes MacroPoint vs Uber

Descartes MacroPoint
Logistics
Freight visibility network that tracks loads across carriers using ELD, telematics and driver mobile data
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Uber
Logistics
We reimagine the way the world moves for the better
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Descartes MacroPoint pricing is per tracked load and unpublished, and rates fall steeply with volume, so a small broker pays a much higher unit price than a large one for identical service and has little negotiating leverage.; Uber the vendor's About page publishes no fare, commission or fee structure, pointing users to individual service pages or the app instead
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Descartes MacroPoint and Uber actually diverge.
| Attribute | Descartes MacroPoint | Uber |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | quote | transaction |
| Platforms | Web, iOS, Android | Web |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Logistics).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Descartes MacroPoint
- Carrier network
- Multi-source tracking
- Predictive ETA
- Exception alerts
- Multimodal
- Capacity matching
- API and TMS integration
- Customer portals
Only in Uber
Nothing recorded that Descartes MacroPoint does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Descartes MacroPoint
- A freight broker whose largest customer has made tracking compliance a contract conditionnot Uber
- A shipper wanting one tracking view across dozens of carriers rather than a portal per carriernot Uber
- A 3PL measuring carrier performance on dwell and on-time arrival with data the carrier cannot disputenot Uber
- An operation replacing check calls, where the labour saving alone justifies the per-load feenot Uber
Uber
No use cases recorded yet. See the Uber review.
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Descartes MacroPoint
- Pricing is per tracked load and unpublished, and rates fall steeply with volume, so a small broker pays a much higher unit price than a large one for identical service and has little negotiating leverage.
- Tracking depends on carrier consent, so coverage on any given lane is a percentage rather than a guarantee, and the carriers most likely to be untracked are the small ones causing the exceptions you care about.
- Driver mobile tracking as the fallback depends on drivers accepting location sharing, and refusal rates mean visibility gaps that appear as service failures to your customer.
- Ocean and air visibility is materially less mature than domestic North American truckload, so a global shipper ends up running a second platform for international freight.
- MacroPoint is one product inside a large acquisitive software group, so roadmap attention and support responsiveness are set by Descartes portfolio priorities rather than by visibility customers.
Uber
- The vendor's About page publishes no fare, commission or fee structure, pointing users to individual service pages or the app instead
- Freight and Health offerings are separate products bundled under the Uber brand rather than available through the standard rider app
Pricing, plan by plan
Descartes MacroPoint
On request- Descartes MacroPoint$undefined/year
- Priced per tracked load with rates varying by mode and volume
- Per-load rates fall substantially at high volume, so small shippers pay more per load
- Annual subscription with minimum commitments
Uber
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Uber review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Descartes MacroPoint if
- You need carrier network.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want multi-source tracking.
Choose Uber if
Nothing in the data separates Uber from Descartes MacroPoint on the points above - pick on price and on how each one feels to use.
Questions people ask
- Is Descartes MacroPoint or Uber better?
- Neither clearly leads. Descartes MacroPoint starts at On request and Uber at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Descartes MacroPoint or Uber?
- Descartes MacroPoint starts at On request and Uber at On request.
- Does Descartes MacroPoint or Uber run on more platforms?
- Descartes MacroPoint runs on Web, iOS, Android. Uber runs on Web.
- What is Descartes MacroPoint best used for?
- Descartes MacroPoint is most often used for a freight broker whose largest customer has made tracking compliance a contract condition, a shipper wanting one tracking view across dozens of carriers rather than a portal per carrier, a 3pl measuring carrier performance on dwell and on-time arrival with data the carrier cannot dispute, an operation replacing check calls, where the labour saving alone justifies the per-load fee. Of those, a freight broker whose largest customer has made tracking compliance a contract condition and a shipper wanting one tracking view across dozens of carriers rather than a portal per carrier are not what Uber is typically brought in for.
- What can Descartes MacroPoint do that Uber cannot?
- Descartes MacroPoint covers Carrier network, Multi-source tracking, Predictive ETA, Exception alerts.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Descartes MacroPoint: How is MacroPoint priced?
Per tracked load, varying by mode and volume, quoted per customer. Nothing is published as a list price.
Descartes MacroPoint: What happens when a carrier has no telematics?
A driver mobile app is used as a fallback, which depends on the driver agreeing to share location.
Descartes MacroPoint: Is it only North American trucking?
No, it covers ocean, rail, LTL and parcel too, but truckload in North America is where coverage is strongest.
Descartes MacroPoint: Who owns it?
Descartes Systems Group, which acquired MacroPoint in 2017 and retains it as a named product.
Related pages
More on Descartes MacroPoint
Other head to heads
- Descartes MacroPoint vs Truckbase
- Descartes MacroPoint vs Deposco
- Descartes MacroPoint vs CargoWise
- Descartes MacroPoint vs Manhattan Associates
- Descartes MacroPoint vs Shipwell
- Descartes MacroPoint vs Blue Yonder
- Descartes MacroPoint vs Shippabo
- Descartes MacroPoint vs Softeon
- Descartes MacroPoint vs Transporeon
- Descartes MacroPoint vs McLeod Software
- Descartes MacroPoint vs Loadsmart
- Descartes MacroPoint vs Transfix
- Descartes MacroPoint vs SpireStock
- Descartes MacroPoint vs Trimble TMW.Suite
- Descartes MacroPoint vs Trucker Path
- Descartes MacroPoint vs Deliverr
- Descartes MacroPoint vs AfterShip
- Descartes MacroPoint vs Cargoson
- Descartes MacroPoint vs CWILL Post-Purchase
- Descartes MacroPoint vs Detrack
- Descartes MacroPoint vs Onfleet
- Descartes MacroPoint vs Locate2u
- Descartes MacroPoint vs Descartes Systems
- Descartes MacroPoint vs Turvo
- Descartes MacroPoint vs Freightview
- Descartes MacroPoint vs Alpega
- Descartes MacroPoint vs Alvys
- Descartes MacroPoint vs EasyPost
- Descartes MacroPoint vs Easyship
- Descartes MacroPoint vs Kuebix
- Descartes MacroPoint vs Descartes Aljex
- Uber vs Truckbase
- Uber vs Deposco
- Uber vs CargoWise
- Uber vs Manhattan Associates
- Uber vs Shipwell
- Uber vs Blue Yonder
- Uber vs Shippabo
- Uber vs Softeon
- Uber vs Transporeon
- Uber vs McLeod Software
- Uber vs Loadsmart
- Uber vs Transfix
- Uber vs SpireStock
- Uber vs Trimble TMW.Suite
- Uber vs Trucker Path
- Uber vs Deliverr
- Uber vs AfterShip
- Uber vs Cargoson
- Uber vs CWILL Post-Purchase
- Uber vs Detrack
- Uber vs Onfleet
- Uber vs Locate2u
- Uber vs Descartes Systems
- Uber vs Turvo
- Uber vs Freightview
- Uber vs Alpega
- Uber vs Alvys
- Uber vs EasyPost
- Uber vs Easyship
- Uber vs Kuebix
- Uber vs Descartes Aljex
