Cybersecurity · head to head
OWASP ZAP vs Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud

OWASP ZAP
Cybersecurity
Free, open-source web application scanner and intercepting proxy, now governed by the Software Security Project.
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
Cybersecurity
Cloud-native application protection platform
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only OWASP ZAP has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: OWASP ZAP authenticated scanning of modern single-page applications is the hard part and ZAP makes you build it by hand: session handling, token refresh and login scripts are configured per application, and a misconfigured session means the scanner logs itself out and reports a clean result for pages it never reached.; Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud listed on UK G-Cloud at £147.54 per unit for Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud, via reseller Phoenix Software Limited, with the billing period not stated on the listing
- They diverge on capability: OWASP ZAP covers Intercepting proxy, Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud covers Cloud Security Posture Management.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which OWASP ZAP and Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud actually diverge.
| Attribute | OWASP ZAP | Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | free | subscription |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Desktop, Cli, Api | Web, Api |
| Founded | 2001 | 2005 |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in OWASP ZAP
- Intercepting proxy
- Passive scanner
- Active scanner
- AJAX spider
- Automation Framework
- Headless daemon and REST API
- Docker images
- Add-on marketplace
Only in Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
- Cloud Security Posture Management
- Cloud Workload Protection
- Cloud Network Security
- Cloud Identity Security
- Code Security
- API Security
- Data Security
- Microsegmentation
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
OWASP ZAP
- Adding a baseline security scan to every application's pipeline where per-target commercial licensing would limit coverage to a handfulnot Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
- Manual penetration testing that needs an intercepting proxy, request replay and fuzzing without a paid licence per testernot Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
- Teaching developers what an attack against their own endpoint looks like, using a tool they can install themselvesnot Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
- Pre-release regression scanning of an internal application that would never justify a commercial DAST subscriptionnot Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
- Cloud Securitynot OWASP ZAP
- Cspmnot OWASP ZAP
- Cwppnot OWASP ZAP
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
OWASP ZAP
- Authenticated scanning of modern single-page applications is the hard part and ZAP makes you build it by hand: session handling, token refresh and login scripts are configured per application, and a misconfigured session means the scanner logs itself out and reports a clean result for pages it never reached.
- There is no support contract in the product, so when a scan breaks the day before a release the escalation path is a GitHub issue and a community chat, which is not an answer that satisfies a delivery manager or an auditor who wants a named responsible party.
- Active scanning sends genuine attack traffic, so it can create records, trigger emails, exhaust rate limits or destabilise a fragile environment, and pointing it at production without prior agreement produces an incident rather than a test result.
- Output needs triage: passive rules generate large volumes of low-severity informational findings about headers and cookie flags that bury the few results that matter, and a team without someone tuning the rule set stops reading the report within a few sprints.
- As a dynamic scanner it can only test what it can reach, so authorisation flaws between accounts, business logic abuse and anything behind an undiscovered endpoint go unreported, and a passing ZAP scan is evidence of nothing more than the absence of the classes of bug it looks for.
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
- Listed on UK G-Cloud at £147.54 per unit for Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud, via reseller Phoenix Software Limited, with the billing period not stated on the listing
Pricing, plan by plan
OWASP ZAP
Free- Free & Open SourceFree
- Full functionality
- Active & passive scanning
- Spider
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
On request- Cloud SecurityFree
- CSPM
- CWPP
- CIEM
- Code SecurityFree
- IaC security
- SCA
- Secrets scanning
- Prisma Cloud EnterpriseFree
- Full platform
- API security
- Data security
Which should you pick?
Choose OWASP ZAP if
- You need intercepting proxy.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Desktop, Cli, Api.
- You also want passive scanner.
Choose Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud if
- You need cloud security posture management.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want cloud workload protection.
Questions people ask
- Is OWASP ZAP or Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud better?
- Neither clearly leads. OWASP ZAP starts at Free and Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, OWASP ZAP or Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud?
- OWASP ZAP has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for OWASP ZAP and On request for Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud.
- Does OWASP ZAP or Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud run on more platforms?
- OWASP ZAP runs on Desktop, Cli, Api. Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud runs on Web, Api.
- Can I use OWASP ZAP for free?
- Yes. OWASP ZAP has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud starts at On request.
- What is OWASP ZAP best used for?
- OWASP ZAP is most often used for adding a baseline security scan to every application's pipeline where per-target commercial licensing would limit coverage to a handful, manual penetration testing that needs an intercepting proxy, request replay and fuzzing without a paid licence per tester, teaching developers what an attack against their own endpoint looks like, using a tool they can install themselves, pre-release regression scanning of an internal application that would never justify a commercial dast subscription. Of those, adding a baseline security scan to every application's pipeline where per-target commercial licensing would limit coverage to a handful and manual penetration testing that needs an intercepting proxy, request replay and fuzzing without a paid licence per tester are not what Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud is typically brought in for.
- What can OWASP ZAP do that Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud cannot?
- OWASP ZAP covers Intercepting proxy, Passive scanner, Active scanner, AJAX spider. Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud covers Cloud Security Posture Management, Cloud Workload Protection, Cloud Network Security, Cloud Identity Security.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
OWASP ZAP: Is it still called OWASP ZAP?
The project left OWASP in August 2024 and is now governed by the Software Security Project, with core development sponsored by Checkmarx. The tool is now just ZAP, though most existing documentation, courses and search results still use the OWASP name.
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud: How much does Prisma Cloud cost?
Prisma Cloud pricing is not published publicly. Pricing is provided through the sales team via a custom quote based on your deployment scope and requirements.
SourceOWASP ZAP: Is it free for commercial use?
Yes. It is Apache 2.0 licensed, with no per-application, per-scan or per-user cost, and it can be used and modified commercially without a licence agreement.
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud: Is there a free trial for Prisma Cloud?
No free trial is available without contacting the sales team. The company offers a demo through the product demo center or by requesting a demo through their sales process.
SourceOWASP ZAP: Can it replace a penetration test?
No. It automates checks for known vulnerability classes against endpoints it can reach. It does not reason about business logic, chain findings into an attack, or test authorisation between accounts, which is most of what a tester actually does.
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud: What do I need to do to get Prisma Cloud pricing and start a trial?
You must contact the sales team via the Contact Us link or request a demo. Pricing details are provided only through direct sales engagement.
SourceOWASP ZAP: Does it run in CI?
Yes, through the official Docker images and the Automation Framework, which defines scan jobs in YAML so configuration lives in the repository. A baseline passive scan is the usual starting point because it is fast and non-intrusive.
OWASP ZAP: How does it compare to Burp Suite?
Burp Suite Professional is the more polished manual testing tool and has a stronger scanner and extension ecosystem, but it is licensed per tester and Burp Suite Enterprise per target. ZAP is the better fit where cost per target is the binding constraint; many teams use both.
Related pages
More on Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
Other head to heads
- OWASP ZAP vs 1Password
- OWASP ZAP vs Bitdefender Total Security
- OWASP ZAP vs Norton 360
- OWASP ZAP vs LastPass
- OWASP ZAP vs Bitwarden
- OWASP ZAP vs Burp Suite
- OWASP ZAP vs Metasploit
- OWASP ZAP vs Wireshark
- OWASP ZAP vs authentik
- OWASP ZAP vs Authelia
- OWASP ZAP vs Infisical
- OWASP ZAP vs Trivy
- OWASP ZAP vs Feedzai
- OWASP ZAP vs Frontegg
- OWASP ZAP vs HashiCorp Boundary
- OWASP ZAP vs JumpCloud
- OWASP ZAP vs McAfee Total Protection
- OWASP ZAP vs Sysdig
- OWASP ZAP vs Snyk
- OWASP ZAP vs Aikido
- OWASP ZAP vs Zscaler Internet Access
- OWASP ZAP vs Semgrep
- OWASP ZAP vs Veracode
- OWASP ZAP vs Tenable
- OWASP ZAP vs Proofpoint
- OWASP ZAP vs NICE Actimize
- OWASP ZAP vs Spot AI
- OWASP ZAP vs Syft
- OWASP ZAP vs ThetaRay
- Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud vs 1Password
- Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud vs Norton 360
- Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud vs LastPass
- Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud vs Bitwarden
- Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud vs Burp Suite
- Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud vs Metasploit
- Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud vs Wireshark
- Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud vs authentik
- Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud vs Authelia
- Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud vs Infisical
- Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud vs Trivy
- Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud vs Feedzai
- Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud vs Frontegg
- Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud vs HashiCorp Boundary
- Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud vs JumpCloud
- Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud vs McAfee Total Protection
- Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud vs Sysdig
- Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud vs Snyk
- Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud vs Aikido
- Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud vs Zscaler Internet Access
- Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud vs Semgrep
- Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud vs Veracode
- Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud vs Tenable
- Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud vs Proofpoint
- Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud vs NICE Actimize
- Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud vs Spot AI
- Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud vs Syft
- Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud vs ThetaRay
