Softwr

Technology · head to head

Maze vs Sourcegraph

Maze logo

Maze

Technology

The continuous product discovery platform

From
Free
Free plan
Yes
Full reviewWebsite
Sourcegraph logo

Sourcegraph

Developer Tools

Code search and intelligence platform for large codebases with Cody AI assistant

From
$16000/year
Free plan
No
Full reviewWebsite

The short version

  • Only Maze has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
  • Each has a real cost: Maze maze publishes no prices on its pricing page; every plan routes to contact sales, so pricing is by quote only with no published rate or minimum; Sourcegraph enterprise pricing starting at $16k annually creates significant barrier for small teams
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Maze and Sourcegraph actually diverge.

Attributes where Maze and Sourcegraph differ
AttributeMazeSourcegraph
Starting priceFree$16000/year
Free tierYesNo
PlatformsWeb, Mobile, ApiCloud, Self-hosted
CategoryTechnologyDeveloper Tools
Founded2018Unknown

Identical on both: pricing model (subscription), user rating (Not yet rated).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Maze

  • Prototype testing
  • Usability testing
  • Card sorting
  • Tree testing
  • Surveys
  • 5-second tests
  • A/B testing
  • Analytics dashboard

Only in Sourcegraph

Nothing recorded that Maze does not also cover.

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Maze

  • User research and testingnot Sourcegraph
  • AI-powered moderation featuresnot Sourcegraph
  • Prototype and website testingnot Sourcegraph
  • User feedback panelsnot Sourcegraph

Sourcegraph

  • Large-scale code migrations across hundreds of repositoriesnot Maze
  • Enterprise governance and code ownership trackingnot Maze
  • AI-assisted bug hunting and security pattern detectionnot Maze
  • Onboarding engineers into large unfamiliar codebasesnot Maze
  • Regulatory compliance and code audit trailsnot Maze

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Maze

  • Maze publishes no prices on its pricing page; every plan routes to contact sales, so pricing is by quote only with no published rate or minimum
  • The AI study builder, AI moderated interviews and moderated interview studies are Enterprise only
  • Mobile testing and testing through the Maze mobile app are Enterprise only
  • Interview scheduling, card sorting and information architecture testing are Enterprise only
  • Role-based access, SSO and compliance controls are Enterprise only
  • Panel recruitment is available on all plans but with stated limits, and prototype testing carries limits below Enterprise
  • Qualitative analysis of clip recordings, interview transcription and automated theme analysis are Enterprise only

Sourcegraph

  • Enterprise pricing starting at $16k annually creates significant barrier for small teams
  • No free tier or standard plan published; all options require custom sales engagement
  • Complex enterprise-only positioning limits adoption compared to GitHub Copilot's pervasiveness
  • Requires indexing entire codebase; not suitable for small or ephemeral projects

Pricing, plan by plan

Maze

Free
  • FreeFree
    • 1 active project
    • Preview link testing
    • Basic analytics
  • Starter$75/month
    • 3 active projects
    • Unlimited responses
    • Advanced analytics
  • Team$150/month
    • Unlimited projects
    • Team collaboration
    • Custom branding
  • Enterprise$undefined/month
    • Everything in Team
    • SSO
    • Dedicated CSM

Sourcegraph

$16000/year
  • Enterprise$16000/year
    • Scales with team size
    • Credits for AI features per user
    • Deep Search

Which should you pick?

Choose Maze if

  • You need prototype testing.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You work on Web, Mobile, Api.
  • You also want usability testing.
Maze review

Choose Sourcegraph if

  • You work on Cloud, Self-hosted.
Sourcegraph review

Questions people ask

Is Maze or Sourcegraph better?
Neither clearly leads. Maze starts at Free and Sourcegraph at $16000/year, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Maze or Sourcegraph?
Maze has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Maze and $16000/year for Sourcegraph.
Does Maze or Sourcegraph run on more platforms?
Maze runs on Web, Mobile, Api. Sourcegraph runs on Cloud, Self-hosted.
Can I use Maze for free?
Yes. Maze has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Sourcegraph starts at $16000/year.
What is Maze best used for?
Maze is most often used for user research and testing, ai-powered moderation features, prototype and website testing, user feedback panels. Of those, user research and testing and ai-powered moderation features are not what Sourcegraph is typically brought in for.
What can Maze do that Sourcegraph cannot?
Maze covers Prototype testing, Usability testing, Card sorting, Tree testing.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Maze: Does Maze offer a free trial or freemium tier?

Maze site indicates 'Try Maze for free' option, suggesting free tier or trial availability, but specific terms and limitations not stated on main page.

Source
Maze: Can I request a custom demo if standard plans don't fit my needs?

Yes, Maze offers 'Request a demo' option, indicating willingness to discuss custom requirements and potentially custom pricing arrangements.

Source
Maze: What testing capabilities does Maze include in paid plans?

Maze features AI Moderator, prototype testing, panel recruitment, and website testing capabilities across plans, but specific feature tiers and pricing not disclosed publicly.

Source
Share

Related pages

More on Maze

More on Sourcegraph

Keep looking

Other head to heads