Logistics · head to head
Manhattan Associates vs Shippabo

Manhattan Associates
Logistics
Tier-one warehouse, order and transportation management, now cloud subscription only
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Shippabo
Logistics
Freight forwarder with its own import management platform, priced on container volume
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Manhattan Associates manhattan Active is cloud subscription only with no perpetual licence and no on-premises deployment, so organisations with a capital purchasing model or air-gapped requirements are excluded outright.; Shippabo the software is priced on container volume under an annual service agreement, so the fee moves with freight rather than usage and a soft import season still carries a committed cost.
- They diverge on capability: Manhattan Associates covers Warehouse management, Shippabo covers Purchase order tracking.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Manhattan Associates and Shippabo actually diverge.
| Attribute | Manhattan Associates | Shippabo |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Web, Cloud, iOS, Android | Web |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Logistics).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Manhattan Associates
- Warehouse management
- Order management
- Transportation management
- Labour management
- Yard management
- Versionless updates
- Store and point of sale
Only in Shippabo
- Purchase order tracking
- Shipment visibility
- Customs brokerage
- Supplier collaboration
- Landed cost
- System integrations
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Manhattan Associates
- A retailer fulfilling store, ecommerce and wholesale orders from one inventory pool without separate systems per channelnot Shippabo
- A distribution centre introducing goods-to-person robotics that needs the WMS to orchestrate the automationnot Shippabo
- A third-party logistics provider running multiple clients with different processes in one facilitynot Shippabo
- An operation where labour is the largest cost and engineered standards would pay for the softwarenot Shippabo
Shippabo
- A mid-sized importer bringing containers from China that needs PO-level visibility without building it in-housenot Manhattan Associates
- A wholesaler that wants factories updating purchase order status directly instead of by emailnot Manhattan Associates
- A retailer needing landed cost per shipment to price goods before they arrivenot Manhattan Associates
- An importer consolidating forwarding, customs brokerage and tracking with one providernot Manhattan Associates
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Manhattan Associates
- Manhattan Active is cloud subscription only with no perpetual licence and no on-premises deployment, so organisations with a capital purchasing model or air-gapped requirements are excluded outright.
- Legacy WMOS and SCALE customers pay annual maintenance of roughly 18 to 22 per cent of licence value while the vendor steers investment towards Active, so staying put has a rising opportunity cost as well as a cash cost.
- Implementation is a tier-one project measured in quarters, and system integrator fees routinely match or exceed several years of subscription, which is the part that breaks budgets rather than the licence.
- Functional depth assumes complexity; operations with simple distribution end up configuring around capability they do not need and paying for it every year.
- Modules are priced individually, so warehouse, order, transportation and labour management each carry their own line, and a business case built on the WMS alone understates the eventual footprint.
Shippabo
- The software is priced on container volume under an annual service agreement, so the fee moves with freight rather than usage and a soft import season still carries a committed cost.
- Platform and forwarding are bought together, which makes tendering freight to a cheaper carrier expensive because you risk losing the visibility layer your team uses.
- As a small forwarder it has less network depth and weaker space allocation than the global incumbents, which bites hardest in a tight ocean market when capacity is rationed to large accounts.
- Nothing is published about price, so importers cannot benchmark the software fee against independent visibility vendors without a sales process.
- Coverage is concentrated on the trans-Pacific import lane, so companies with significant intra-Europe, Latin American or export flows need a second provider anyway.
Pricing, plan by plan
Manhattan Associates
On request- Manhattan Active Warehouse Management$undefined/year
- Cloud subscription only, no perpetual licence
- Versionless with continuous updates
- Priced per module and by volume or site
- Manhattan Active Omni and Transportation$undefined/year
- Order management, point of sale and store fulfilment
- Multimodal transportation management
- Each module priced separately
- Legacy WMOS and SCALE$undefined/year
- Perpetual licence held by existing customers
- Annual maintenance typically 18 to 22 per cent of licence value
- Still sold to existing customers with extended support
Shippabo
On request- Shippabo Platform$undefined/year
- Annual software service agreement
- Priced on container volume and partner count
- Purchase order and container visibility
Which should you pick?
Choose Manhattan Associates if
- You need warehouse management.
- You work on Web, Cloud, iOS, Android.
- You also want order management.
Choose Shippabo if
- You need purchase order tracking.
- You also want shipment visibility.
Questions people ask
- Is Manhattan Associates or Shippabo better?
- Neither clearly leads. Manhattan Associates starts at On request and Shippabo at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Manhattan Associates or Shippabo?
- Manhattan Associates starts at On request and Shippabo at On request.
- Does Manhattan Associates or Shippabo run on more platforms?
- Manhattan Associates runs on Web, Cloud, iOS, Android. Shippabo runs on Web.
- What is Manhattan Associates best used for?
- Manhattan Associates is most often used for a retailer fulfilling store, ecommerce and wholesale orders from one inventory pool without separate systems per channel, a distribution centre introducing goods-to-person robotics that needs the wms to orchestrate the automation, a third-party logistics provider running multiple clients with different processes in one facility, an operation where labour is the largest cost and engineered standards would pay for the software. Of those, a retailer fulfilling store, ecommerce and wholesale orders from one inventory pool without separate systems per channel and a distribution centre introducing goods-to-person robotics that needs the wms to orchestrate the automation are not what Shippabo is typically brought in for.
- What can Manhattan Associates do that Shippabo cannot?
- Manhattan Associates covers Warehouse management, Order management, Transportation management, Labour management. Shippabo covers Purchase order tracking, Shipment visibility, Customs brokerage, Supplier collaboration.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Manhattan Associates: Can I buy Manhattan Active on-premises or perpetually?
No. Manhattan Active is cloud-native SaaS priced per module by subscription, with no perpetual licence option.
Shippabo: Is Shippabo still trading?
Yes. The platform and freight services are active, operated by Galleon Technology with United States and China operations.
Manhattan Associates: What happens to my WMOS or SCALE licence?
Existing perpetual licences continue, with maintenance typically 18 to 22 per cent of licence value each year. Manhattan offers discounted transition pricing to move to Active.
Shippabo: Can I buy the software without using Shippabo as my forwarder?
The visibility product is sold as an annual agreement priced on container volume and partners, so it is structured around the freight relationship rather than as a standalone subscription.
Manhattan Associates: What does versionless actually mean?
Updates are applied continuously while the subscription is active, so there is no separate upgrade project, but you also do not control when changes arrive.
Shippabo: How is it priced?
On container volume and partner count under an annual software service agreement. No figures are published.
Manhattan Associates: How much does implementation cost relative to the software?
Expect a system integrator engagement comparable to or larger than several years of subscription. Budget for it as the main line, not a footnote.
Shippabo: Is it a neutral multi-carrier platform?
No. It is a forwarder's own platform, so it will not give you a genuinely carrier-agnostic view of freight you tender elsewhere.
Related pages
More on Manhattan Associates
Other head to heads
- Manhattan Associates vs Blue Yonder
- Manhattan Associates vs Deposco
- Manhattan Associates vs Softeon
- Manhattan Associates vs ShipHero
- Manhattan Associates vs Descartes Systems
- Manhattan Associates vs Logiwa
- Manhattan Associates vs CargoWise
- Manhattan Associates vs Shipwell
- Manhattan Associates vs McLeod Software
- Manhattan Associates vs Turvo
- Manhattan Associates vs Onfleet
- Manhattan Associates vs Shippo
- Manhattan Associates vs ShipStation
- Manhattan Associates vs Alpega
- Manhattan Associates vs Descartes MacroPoint
- Manhattan Associates vs Loadsmart
- Manhattan Associates vs Transfix
- Manhattan Associates vs Detrack
- Manhattan Associates vs Alvys
- Manhattan Associates vs EasyPost
- Manhattan Associates vs Easyship
- Manhattan Associates vs Kuebix
- Manhattan Associates vs Descartes Aljex
- Shippabo vs Blue Yonder
- Shippabo vs Deposco
- Shippabo vs Softeon
- Shippabo vs ShipHero
- Shippabo vs Descartes Systems
- Shippabo vs Logiwa
- Shippabo vs CargoWise
- Shippabo vs Shipwell
- Shippabo vs McLeod Software
- Shippabo vs Turvo
- Shippabo vs Onfleet
- Shippabo vs Shippo
- Shippabo vs ShipStation
- Shippabo vs Alpega
- Shippabo vs Descartes MacroPoint
- Shippabo vs Loadsmart
- Shippabo vs Transfix
- Shippabo vs Detrack
- Shippabo vs Alvys
- Shippabo vs EasyPost
- Shippabo vs Easyship
- Shippabo vs Kuebix
- Shippabo vs Descartes Aljex
