Logistics · head to head
Alvys vs Manhattan Associates

Alvys
Logistics
Cloud transportation management system built for carriers and brokers that run both sides of the business
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Manhattan Associates
Logistics
Tier-one warehouse, order and transportation management, now cloud subscription only
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Alvys the company was founded in 2020, so the integration catalogue is short compared with systems that have spent thirty years accumulating EDI trading partner maps, and a customer with an unusual shipper connection may be funding that build.; Manhattan Associates manhattan Active is cloud subscription only with no perpetual licence and no on-premises deployment, so organisations with a capital purchasing model or air-gapped requirements are excluded outright.
- They diverge on capability: Alvys covers Unified asset and brokerage loads, Manhattan Associates covers Warehouse management.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Alvys and Manhattan Associates actually diverge.
| Attribute | Alvys | Manhattan Associates |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Web, iOS, Android, API | Web, Cloud, iOS, Android |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Logistics).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Alvys
- Unified asset and brokerage loads
- Dispatch board
- Driver mobile app
- Carrier onboarding
- Settlements and invoicing
- Load and lane reporting
Only in Manhattan Associates
- Warehouse management
- Order management
- Transportation management
- Labour management
- Yard management
- Versionless updates
- Store and point of sale
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Alvys
- A carrier with its own trucks that also brokers overflow freight and is tired of reconciling two systemsnot Manhattan Associates
- A growing brokerage that wants a hosted system without an on premises database server and a DBAnot Manhattan Associates
- A trucking company that needs drivers to submit paperwork from the cab instead of at the terminal on Fridaynot Manhattan Associates
- A fleet replacing spreadsheets for settlements and wanting per load margin without a month end exercisenot Manhattan Associates
Manhattan Associates
- A retailer fulfilling store, ecommerce and wholesale orders from one inventory pool without separate systems per channelnot Alvys
- A distribution centre introducing goods-to-person robotics that needs the WMS to orchestrate the automationnot Alvys
- A third-party logistics provider running multiple clients with different processes in one facilitynot Alvys
- An operation where labour is the largest cost and engineered standards would pay for the softwarenot Alvys
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Alvys
- The company was founded in 2020, so the integration catalogue is short compared with systems that have spent thirty years accumulating EDI trading partner maps, and a customer with an unusual shipper connection may be funding that build.
- There is effectively no independent consultant market, so implementation, data migration and configuration expertise all come from the vendor, which is a single point of dependency during a cutover.
- Accounting depth is limited and most customers still run a general ledger in QuickBooks or similar, so the TMS is a subledger rather than the finance system.
- Complex driver pay schemes, cross border currency handling and heavy accessorial structures in drayage are areas where the older systems are more complete and where workarounds are still common.
- Pricing is not published, so a buyer cannot size the cost before entering a sales process, and per user pricing on a dispatch team with part time night staff can be an unpleasant surprise.
Manhattan Associates
- Manhattan Active is cloud subscription only with no perpetual licence and no on-premises deployment, so organisations with a capital purchasing model or air-gapped requirements are excluded outright.
- Legacy WMOS and SCALE customers pay annual maintenance of roughly 18 to 22 per cent of licence value while the vendor steers investment towards Active, so staying put has a rising opportunity cost as well as a cash cost.
- Implementation is a tier-one project measured in quarters, and system integrator fees routinely match or exceed several years of subscription, which is the part that breaks budgets rather than the licence.
- Functional depth assumes complexity; operations with simple distribution end up configuring around capability they do not need and paying for it every year.
- Modules are priced individually, so warehouse, order, transportation and labour management each carry their own line, and a business case built on the WMS alone understates the eventual footprint.
Pricing, plan by plan
Alvys
On request- Alvys TMS$undefined/year
- Dispatch, brokerage and settlements
- Driver mobile application
- Integrations and reporting
Manhattan Associates
On request- Manhattan Active Warehouse Management$undefined/year
- Cloud subscription only, no perpetual licence
- Versionless with continuous updates
- Priced per module and by volume or site
- Manhattan Active Omni and Transportation$undefined/year
- Order management, point of sale and store fulfilment
- Multimodal transportation management
- Each module priced separately
- Legacy WMOS and SCALE$undefined/year
- Perpetual licence held by existing customers
- Annual maintenance typically 18 to 22 per cent of licence value
- Still sold to existing customers with extended support
Which should you pick?
Choose Alvys if
- You need unified asset and brokerage loads.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android, API.
- You also want dispatch board.
Choose Manhattan Associates if
- You need warehouse management.
- You work on Web, Cloud, iOS, Android.
- You also want order management.
Questions people ask
- Is Alvys or Manhattan Associates better?
- Neither clearly leads. Alvys starts at On request and Manhattan Associates at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Alvys or Manhattan Associates?
- Alvys starts at On request and Manhattan Associates at On request.
- Does Alvys or Manhattan Associates run on more platforms?
- Alvys runs on Web, iOS, Android, API. Manhattan Associates runs on Web, Cloud, iOS, Android.
- What is Alvys best used for?
- Alvys is most often used for a carrier with its own trucks that also brokers overflow freight and is tired of reconciling two systems, a growing brokerage that wants a hosted system without an on premises database server and a dba, a trucking company that needs drivers to submit paperwork from the cab instead of at the terminal on friday, a fleet replacing spreadsheets for settlements and wanting per load margin without a month end exercise. Of those, a carrier with its own trucks that also brokers overflow freight and is tired of reconciling two systems and a growing brokerage that wants a hosted system without an on premises database server and a dba are not what Manhattan Associates is typically brought in for.
- What can Alvys do that Manhattan Associates cannot?
- Alvys covers Unified asset and brokerage loads, Dispatch board, Driver mobile app, Carrier onboarding. Manhattan Associates covers Warehouse management, Order management, Transportation management, Labour management.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Alvys: Does it work for a company that only brokers?
Yes, and also for one that only hauls. The point is that it does not force a choice.
Manhattan Associates: Can I buy Manhattan Active on-premises or perpetually?
No. Manhattan Active is cloud-native SaaS priced per module by subscription, with no perpetual licence option.
Alvys: Is it hosted or on premises?
Hosted only. There is no on premises deployment option.
Manhattan Associates: What happens to my WMOS or SCALE licence?
Existing perpetual licences continue, with maintenance typically 18 to 22 per cent of licence value each year. Manhattan offers discounted transition pricing to move to Active.
Alvys: Does it replace my accounting system?
No. It handles settlements and invoicing and pushes to an accounting package.
Manhattan Associates: What does versionless actually mean?
Updates are applied continuously while the subscription is active, so there is no separate upgrade project, but you also do not control when changes arrive.
Alvys: Is pricing published?
No. Expect a quote based on users and volume.
Manhattan Associates: How much does implementation cost relative to the software?
Expect a system integrator engagement comparable to or larger than several years of subscription. Budget for it as the main line, not a footnote.
Related pages
More on Manhattan Associates
Other head to heads
- Alvys vs Turvo
- Alvys vs McLeod Software
- Alvys vs Descartes Aljex
- Alvys vs Trimble TMW.Suite
- Alvys vs Truckbase
- Alvys vs Loadsmart
- Alvys vs Rose Rocket
- Alvys vs Transfix
- Alvys vs Uber Freight
- Alvys vs Trucker Path
- Alvys vs Shipwell
- Alvys vs Softeon
- Alvys vs SpireStock
- Alvys vs Transporeon
- Alvys vs Descartes Systems
- Alvys vs Blue Yonder
- Alvys vs Deposco
- Alvys vs ShipHero
- Alvys vs Logiwa
- Alvys vs CargoWise
- Alvys vs Shippabo
- Alvys vs Onfleet
- Alvys vs Shippo
- Alvys vs ShipStation
- Alvys vs Alpega
- Alvys vs Descartes MacroPoint
- Manhattan Associates vs Turvo
- Manhattan Associates vs McLeod Software
- Manhattan Associates vs Descartes Aljex
- Manhattan Associates vs Trimble TMW.Suite
- Manhattan Associates vs Truckbase
- Manhattan Associates vs Loadsmart
- Manhattan Associates vs Rose Rocket
- Manhattan Associates vs Transfix
- Manhattan Associates vs Uber Freight
- Manhattan Associates vs Trucker Path
- Manhattan Associates vs Shipwell
- Manhattan Associates vs Softeon
- Manhattan Associates vs SpireStock
- Manhattan Associates vs Transporeon
- Manhattan Associates vs Descartes Systems
- Manhattan Associates vs Blue Yonder
- Manhattan Associates vs Deposco
- Manhattan Associates vs ShipHero
- Manhattan Associates vs Logiwa
- Manhattan Associates vs CargoWise
- Manhattan Associates vs Shippabo
- Manhattan Associates vs Onfleet
- Manhattan Associates vs Shippo
- Manhattan Associates vs ShipStation
- Manhattan Associates vs Alpega
- Manhattan Associates vs Descartes MacroPoint
