Is Alpega or Alvys better?

Neither clearly leads. Alpega starts at On request and Alvys at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.

Which is cheaper, Alpega or Alvys?

Alpega starts at On request and Alvys at On request.

Does Alpega or Alvys run on more platforms?

Alpega runs on Web, Cloud, iOS, Android. Alvys runs on Web, iOS, Android, API.

What is Alpega best used for?

Alpega is most often used for a european manufacturer that needs both contracted transport planning and spot capacity from the same supplier, a shipper running periodic freight tenders across dozens of road hauliers and comparing rates on a common basis, a logistics provider needing verified carrier credentials and credit checks before handing over a load, an operation tracking reusable pallets and crates through a european distribution network. Of those, a european manufacturer that needs both contracted transport planning and spot capacity from the same supplier and a shipper running periodic freight tenders across dozens of road hauliers and comparing rates on a common basis are not what Alvys is typically brought in for.

What can Alpega do that Alvys cannot?

Alpega covers Modular TMS, Freight exchanges, TenderEasy, Real-time visibility. Alvys covers Unified asset and brokerage loads, Dispatch board, Driver mobile app, Carrier onboarding.

Logistics · head to head

Alpega vs Alvys

Alpega

Logistics

European TMS and freight exchange group behind Teleroute and Wtransnet

From: On request
Rated: -

Full review Website

Alvys

Logistics

Cloud transportation management system built for carriers and brokers that run both sides of the business

From: On request
Rated: -

Full review Website

The short version

Each has a real cost: Alpega coverage is strongly European, so a shipper with significant North American or Asian volume will need a second TMS and will lose the single-system benefit that justified the purchase.; Alvys the company was founded in 2020, so the integration catalogue is short compared with systems that have spent thirty years accumulating EDI trading partner maps, and a customer with an unusual shipper connection may be funding that build.
They diverge on capability: Alpega covers Modular TMS, Alvys covers Unified asset and brokerage loads.
Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Alpega and Alvys actually diverge.

Attributes where Alpega and Alvys differ
Attribute	Alpega	Alvys
Platforms	Web, Cloud, iOS, Android	Web, iOS, Android, API

Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Logistics).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Alpega

Modular TMS
Freight exchanges
TenderEasy
Real-time visibility
Carrier verification
Reusable packaging management
Analytics and reporting

Only in Alvys

Unified asset and brokerage loads
Dispatch board
Driver mobile app
Carrier onboarding
Settlements and invoicing
Load and lane reporting

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Alpega

A European manufacturer that needs both contracted transport planning and spot capacity from the same suppliernot Alvys
A shipper running periodic freight tenders across dozens of road hauliers and comparing rates on a common basisnot Alvys
A logistics provider needing verified carrier credentials and credit checks before handing over a loadnot Alvys
An operation tracking reusable pallets and crates through a European distribution networknot Alvys

Alvys

A carrier with its own trucks that also brokers overflow freight and is tired of reconciling two systemsnot Alpega
A growing brokerage that wants a hosted system without an on premises database server and a DBAnot Alpega
A trucking company that needs drivers to submit paperwork from the cab instead of at the terminal on Fridaynot Alpega
A fleet replacing spreadsheets for settlements and wanting per load margin without a month end exercisenot Alpega

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Alpega

Coverage is strongly European, so a shipper with significant North American or Asian volume will need a second TMS and will lose the single-system benefit that justified the purchase.
The group was assembled from acquisitions including Teleroute, Wtransnet, TenderEasy and inet, so modules differ in interface and data model and cross-module workflows are less joined up than the group branding implies.
The TMS and the freight exchanges are separately subscribed, so the combination that is the reason to choose Alpega costs two contracts rather than one.
Pricing is unpublished and typically volume based on shipments or transport orders, so a business whose freight volume grows faces a cost curve it cannot model in advance.
Freight exchange value depends entirely on carrier density on your specific lanes, and a shipper on thin or peripheral routes will find far less capacity than the headline carrier count suggests.

Alvys

The company was founded in 2020, so the integration catalogue is short compared with systems that have spent thirty years accumulating EDI trading partner maps, and a customer with an unusual shipper connection may be funding that build.
There is effectively no independent consultant market, so implementation, data migration and configuration expertise all come from the vendor, which is a single point of dependency during a cutover.
Accounting depth is limited and most customers still run a general ledger in QuickBooks or similar, so the TMS is a subledger rather than the finance system.
Complex driver pay schemes, cross border currency handling and heavy accessorial structures in drayage are areas where the older systems are more complete and where workarounds are still common.
Pricing is not published, so a buyer cannot size the cost before entering a sales process, and per user pricing on a dispatch team with part time night staff can be an unpleasant surprise.

Pricing, plan by plan

Alpega

On request

Alpega TMS$undefined/year
- Modular subscription by function and geography
- Priced by shipment or transport order volume
- Implementation and carrier onboarding quoted separately
Freight exchange subscription$undefined/year
- Teleroute, Wtransnet or 123cargo access
- Subscription by user and country scope
- Carrier verification and credit information included

Alvys

On request

Alvys TMS$undefined/year
- Dispatch, brokerage and settlements
- Driver mobile application
- Integrations and reporting

Which should you pick?

Choose Alpega if

You need modular tms.
You work on Web, Cloud, iOS, Android.
You also want freight exchanges.

Alpega review

Choose Alvys if

You need unified asset and brokerage loads.
You work on Web, iOS, Android, API.
You also want dispatch board.

Alvys review

Questions people ask

Is Alpega or Alvys better?: Neither clearly leads. Alpega starts at On request and Alvys at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Alpega or Alvys?: Alpega starts at On request and Alvys at On request.
Does Alpega or Alvys run on more platforms?: Alpega runs on Web, Cloud, iOS, Android. Alvys runs on Web, iOS, Android, API.
What is Alpega best used for?: Alpega is most often used for a european manufacturer that needs both contracted transport planning and spot capacity from the same supplier, a shipper running periodic freight tenders across dozens of road hauliers and comparing rates on a common basis, a logistics provider needing verified carrier credentials and credit checks before handing over a load, an operation tracking reusable pallets and crates through a european distribution network. Of those, a european manufacturer that needs both contracted transport planning and spot capacity from the same supplier and a shipper running periodic freight tenders across dozens of road hauliers and comparing rates on a common basis are not what Alvys is typically brought in for.
What can Alpega do that Alvys cannot?: Alpega covers Modular TMS, Freight exchanges, TenderEasy, Real-time visibility. Alvys covers Unified asset and brokerage loads, Dispatch board, Driver mobile app, Carrier onboarding.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Alpega: Are the freight exchanges included with the TMS?

No. Teleroute, Wtransnet and 123cargo are separately subscribed products, even though they belong to the same group.

Alvys: Does it work for a company that only brokers?

Yes, and also for one that only hauls. The point is that it does not force a choice.

Alpega: Does Alpega work outside Europe?

Its carrier network and regulatory coverage are built around European road freight. It operates in around 80 countries but the density that makes it useful is intra-European.

Alvys: Is it hosted or on premises?

Hosted only. There is no on premises deployment option.

Alpega: Is pricing published?

No. TMS pricing is quoted by module and usually by shipment or transport order volume. Exchange subscriptions are quoted by user and country scope.

Alvys: Does it replace my accounting system?

No. It handles settlements and invoicing and pushes to an accounting package.

Alpega: What happened to Teleroute and Wtransnet as brands?

Both continue to trade under their own names as Alpega freight exchanges, alongside 123cargo.

Alvys: Is pricing published?

No. Expect a quote based on users and volume.

Alpega vs Alvys

Alpega

Alvys

The short version

Where they differ

What each one covers

Only in Alpega

Only in Alvys

What people use each for

Alpega

Alvys

Where each one falls short

Alpega

Alvys

Pricing, plan by plan

Alpega

Alvys

Which should you pick?

Choose Alpega if

Choose Alvys if

Questions people ask

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Related pages

More on Alpega

More on Alvys

Keep looking

Other head to heads