Softwr

Recruitment · head to head

hireEZ vs Manatal

hireEZ logo

hireEZ

Recruitment

AI sourcing and hiring platform priced against the recruiting tool stack it consolidates

From
On request
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite
Manatal logo

Manatal

Recruitment

Low-cost applicant tracking and recruitment CRM with candidate enrichment, sold to both in-house teams and agencies

From
On request
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: hireEZ the solo tier at $494/month is expensive relative to seat-priced competitors like SeekOut, so it is a poor fit for an individual recruiter comparison-shopping on price alone; Manatal pricing is per recruiter seat, so putting every hiring manager into the system to review candidates multiplies the licence count and erases the price advantage.
  • They diverge on capability: hireEZ covers Multi-platform sourcing, Manatal covers Candidate enrichment.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which hireEZ and Manatal actually diverge.

Attributes where hireEZ and Manatal differ
AttributehireEZManatal
Pricing modelquote, enterprise pricing set against the tool stack replacedPer user per month
PlatformsWeb, Chrome ExtensionWeb

Identical on both: starting price (On request), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Recruitment).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in hireEZ

  • Multi-platform sourcing
  • AI screening
  • Scheduling automation
  • ATS integration
  • Funnel analytics

Only in Manatal

  • Candidate enrichment
  • AI candidate scoring
  • Recruitment CRM
  • Multi-board posting
  • CV parsing
  • Careers page builder
  • Custom pipelines
  • Reporting

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

hireEZ

  • A talent acquisition organisation currently paying separately for sourcing, CRM, outreach, screening and scheduling tools that wants to consolidate spendnot Manatal
  • A Fortune 500-scale recruiting team wanting AI-assisted screening layered onto an existing ATS rather than a full ATS replacementnot Manatal
  • A hiring team that wants to trial consolidation claims for four weeks before signing an annual enterprise contractnot Manatal
  • A recruiter sourcing across many external platforms who wants one search interface instead of switching between LinkedIn, GitHub and other sources individuallynot Manatal

Manatal

  • A small recruitment agency that needs client, candidate and placement tracking without an enterprise contractnot hireEZ
  • An in-house team in Asia Pacific that wants candidate enrichment without paying enterprise ATS pricesnot hireEZ
  • A company processing high applicant volume that needs automated ranking to triage a shortlistnot hireEZ
  • A recruiter running both contingent search and internal hiring from one databasenot hireEZ

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

hireEZ

  • The solo tier at $494/month is expensive relative to seat-priced competitors like SeekOut, so it is a poor fit for an individual recruiter comparison-shopping on price alone
  • Enterprise pricing is set against the stack it replaces rather than a flat number, which makes it hard to sanity-check a quote without first pricing out the alternative tools precisely
  • The four-week verification period is useful diligence but also a real time cost before a team gets to a signed, working system
  • Consolidating sourcing, screening and scheduling into one vendor increases dependency risk if a single tool in that bundle underperforms compared with a dedicated point solution
  • AI-assisted conversational screening still requires human oversight to avoid biased or inconsistent scoring, and hireEZ does not remove that compliance burden from the buyer
  • Cross-platform sourcing depends on external platforms continuing to allow this kind of data access, which is a policy risk outside hireEZ's control

Manatal

  • Pricing is per recruiter seat, so putting every hiring manager into the system to review candidates multiplies the licence count and erases the price advantage.
  • Candidate enrichment depends on public profile data, so accuracy drops sharply in markets where professional networking sites have low penetration and the scores become misleading rather than useful.
  • Integrations with major HRIS and payroll systems are limited compared with Western competitors, so new hire handover is frequently a CSV export rather than a sync.
  • Support operates on Indochina business hours, which leaves European afternoons and all of North American working hours outside the responsive window.
  • Reporting covers recruiter activity and source data but lacks the cohort and quality-of-hire analysis a mature talent function expects, and custom analysis means exporting to a spreadsheet.

Pricing, plan by plan

hireEZ

On request
  • Solo$494/month
    • AI sourcing
    • 7-day free trial
  • Enterprise$undefined/year
    • Priced against the stack hireEZ replaces
    • Four-week verification period before contract

Manatal

On request
  • Professional$undefined/month
    • Per recruiter seat
    • Unlimited jobs and candidates
    • Candidate enrichment and AI scoring
  • Enterprise$undefined/month
    • Per recruiter seat at a higher rate
    • Custom fields and advanced permissions
    • Recruitment CRM for agency use
  • Custom$undefined/year
    • Negotiated terms for larger teams
    • Single sign-on and security review
    • Dedicated account management

Which should you pick?

Choose hireEZ if

  • You need multi-platform sourcing.
  • You work on Web, Chrome Extension.
  • You also want ai screening.
hireEZ review

Choose Manatal if

  • You need candidate enrichment.
  • You also want ai candidate scoring.
Manatal review

Questions people ask

Is hireEZ or Manatal better?
Neither clearly leads. hireEZ starts at On request and Manatal at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, hireEZ or Manatal?
hireEZ starts at On request and Manatal at On request.
Does hireEZ or Manatal run on more platforms?
hireEZ runs on Web, Chrome Extension. Manatal runs on Web.
What is hireEZ best used for?
hireEZ is most often used for a talent acquisition organisation currently paying separately for sourcing, crm, outreach, screening and scheduling tools that wants to consolidate spend, a fortune 500-scale recruiting team wanting ai-assisted screening layered onto an existing ats rather than a full ats replacement, a hiring team that wants to trial consolidation claims for four weeks before signing an annual enterprise contract, a recruiter sourcing across many external platforms who wants one search interface instead of switching between linkedin, github and other sources individually. Of those, a talent acquisition organisation currently paying separately for sourcing, crm, outreach, screening and scheduling tools that wants to consolidate spend and a fortune 500-scale recruiting team wanting ai-assisted screening layered onto an existing ats rather than a full ats replacement are not what Manatal is typically brought in for.
What can hireEZ do that Manatal cannot?
hireEZ covers Multi-platform sourcing, AI screening, Scheduling automation, ATS integration. Manatal covers Candidate enrichment, AI candidate scoring, Recruitment CRM, Multi-board posting.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

hireEZ: Is there a flat published price for teams?

No, only the solo recruiter tier ($494/month) is published; team and enterprise pricing is quoted against the tools being replaced.

Manatal: Is it for agencies or in-house teams?

Both. The agency mode adds client and placement management; the corporate mode is a conventional ATS. Buying the wrong mode means paying for modules you never open.

hireEZ: Does hireEZ replace our ATS?

No, it integrates with more than 40 ATS platforms rather than replacing them.

Manatal: How is it priced compared with other ATS products?

Per recruiter seat per month. That is not comparable with vendors that charge per active job slot or per employee, so model your real user count before comparing headline numbers.

hireEZ: Is there a trial before committing to an annual contract?

Enterprise deals include a stated four-week verification period; the solo tier has a 7-day free trial.

Manatal: Where is candidate data hosted?

On cloud infrastructure with GDPR commitments, but region-specific residency guarantees are weaker than EU-native vendors offer, which matters for regulated European buyers.

Manatal: Does the AI scoring actually work?

It ranks reliably against structured requirements such as skills and experience length. It is far less reliable where enrichment data is sparse.

Share

Related pages

More on hireEZ

More on Manatal

Keep looking

Other head to heads