Softwr

Recruitment · head to head

HackerRank vs Manatal

HackerRank logo

HackerRank

Recruitment

Technical hiring platform with a metered attempt allowance and per-attempt overage charges on its entry tier

From
On request
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite
Manatal logo

Manatal

Recruitment

Low-cost applicant tracking and recruitment CRM with candidate enrichment, sold to both in-house teams and agencies

From
On request
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: HackerRank the Starter tier meters candidate assessment attempts (120 a year included) with roughly 20 US dollars per additional attempt, so a hiring surge or an unexpectedly popular job posting turns directly into overage costs.; Manatal pricing is per recruiter seat, so putting every hiring manager into the system to review candidates multiplies the licence count and erases the price advantage.
  • They diverge on capability: HackerRank covers Coding assessments, Manatal covers Candidate enrichment.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which HackerRank and Manatal actually diverge.

Attributes where HackerRank and Manatal differ
AttributeHackerRankManatal
Pricing modelPer month by tier, with a metered annual candidate attempt allowance and per-attempt overage on StarterPer user per month

Identical on both: starting price (On request), free tier (No), platforms (Web), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Recruitment).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in HackerRank

  • Coding assessments
  • Structured technical interviews
  • Screen and Interview modules
  • Role-specific question libraries
  • Proctoring and integrity checks
  • ATS integration

Only in Manatal

  • Candidate enrichment
  • AI candidate scoring
  • Recruitment CRM
  • Multi-board posting
  • CV parsing
  • Careers page builder
  • Custom pipelines
  • Reporting

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

HackerRank

  • A startup hiring a small, steady volume of engineers where the Starter plan's 120 annual attempts comfortably covers the pipelinenot Manatal
  • A larger engineering organisation needing unlimited user seats across many hiring managers, better served by Pronot Manatal
  • A company wanting both automated screening and live structured technical interviews in one platformnot Manatal
  • An organisation that wants a large, established question library spanning algorithms, system design and role-specific skillsnot Manatal

Manatal

  • A small recruitment agency that needs client, candidate and placement tracking without an enterprise contractnot HackerRank
  • An in-house team in Asia Pacific that wants candidate enrichment without paying enterprise ATS pricesnot HackerRank
  • A company processing high applicant volume that needs automated ranking to triage a shortlistnot HackerRank
  • A recruiter running both contingent search and internal hiring from one databasenot HackerRank

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

HackerRank

  • The Starter tier meters candidate assessment attempts (120 a year included) with roughly 20 US dollars per additional attempt, so a hiring surge or an unexpectedly popular job posting turns directly into overage costs.
  • Starter includes only one user licence, so any team with more than one recruiter or hiring manager needing direct platform access must jump to the far larger Pro commitment.
  • The jump from Starter to Pro is a large step, roughly 100 to 450 US dollars a month, with no published mid-tier option for a team that has outgrown Starter but does not need Pro's full scale.
  • As with any automated coding assessment tool, heavy reliance on it as an early filter risks screening out strong candidates who underperform in artificial timed test conditions.
  • Enterprise-tier features such as custom question libraries and SSO are quote-only, making full cost comparison against Codility or other competitors impossible without entering a sales process.

Manatal

  • Pricing is per recruiter seat, so putting every hiring manager into the system to review candidates multiplies the licence count and erases the price advantage.
  • Candidate enrichment depends on public profile data, so accuracy drops sharply in markets where professional networking sites have low penetration and the scores become misleading rather than useful.
  • Integrations with major HRIS and payroll systems are limited compared with Western competitors, so new hire handover is frequently a CSV export rather than a sync.
  • Support operates on Indochina business hours, which leaves European afternoons and all of North American working hours outside the responsive window.
  • Reporting covers recruiter activity and source data but lacks the cohort and quality-of-hire analysis a mature talent function expects, and custom analysis means exporting to a spreadsheet.

Pricing, plan by plan

HackerRank

On request
  • Starter$100/month
    • 1 user licence
    • Screen and Interview modules included
    • 120 candidate attempts per year included, roughly $20 per additional attempt
  • Pro$450/month
    • Unlimited user seats
    • 4,000+ question library
    • ATS integrations included
  • Enterprise$undefined/year
    • Custom quote
    • Custom question libraries and SSO
    • Dedicated support and account management

Manatal

On request
  • Professional$undefined/month
    • Per recruiter seat
    • Unlimited jobs and candidates
    • Candidate enrichment and AI scoring
  • Enterprise$undefined/month
    • Per recruiter seat at a higher rate
    • Custom fields and advanced permissions
    • Recruitment CRM for agency use
  • Custom$undefined/year
    • Negotiated terms for larger teams
    • Single sign-on and security review
    • Dedicated account management

Which should you pick?

Choose HackerRank if

  • You need coding assessments.
  • You also want structured technical interviews.
HackerRank review

Choose Manatal if

  • You need candidate enrichment.
  • You also want ai candidate scoring.
Manatal review

Questions people ask

Is HackerRank or Manatal better?
Neither clearly leads. HackerRank starts at On request and Manatal at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, HackerRank or Manatal?
HackerRank starts at On request and Manatal at On request.
Does HackerRank or Manatal run on more platforms?
Both run on Web, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
What is HackerRank best used for?
HackerRank is most often used for a startup hiring a small, steady volume of engineers where the starter plan's 120 annual attempts comfortably covers the pipeline, a larger engineering organisation needing unlimited user seats across many hiring managers, better served by pro, a company wanting both automated screening and live structured technical interviews in one platform, an organisation that wants a large, established question library spanning algorithms, system design and role-specific skills. Of those, a startup hiring a small, steady volume of engineers where the starter plan's 120 annual attempts comfortably covers the pipeline and a larger engineering organisation needing unlimited user seats across many hiring managers, better served by pro are not what Manatal is typically brought in for.
What can HackerRank do that Manatal cannot?
HackerRank covers Coding assessments, Structured technical interviews, Screen and Interview modules, Role-specific question libraries. Manatal covers Candidate enrichment, AI candidate scoring, Recruitment CRM, Multi-board posting.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

HackerRank: What happens if we exceed our included assessment attempts on Starter?

Each additional attempt beyond the included 120 a year is billed separately, at roughly 20 US dollars per attempt.

Manatal: Is it for agencies or in-house teams?

Both. The agency mode adds client and placement management; the corporate mode is a conventional ATS. Buying the wrong mode means paying for modules you never open.

HackerRank: How many users does Starter support?

One user licence; teams needing more than one seat must move to the Pro plan.

Manatal: How is it priced compared with other ATS products?

Per recruiter seat per month. That is not comparable with vendors that charge per active job slot or per employee, so model your real user count before comparing headline numbers.

HackerRank: Does HackerRank offer live interviews as well as automated tests?

Yes, both a Screen module for automated assessment and an Interview module for live, collaborative technical interviews are included from Starter upward.

Manatal: Where is candidate data hosted?

On cloud infrastructure with GDPR commitments, but region-specific residency guarantees are weaker than EU-native vendors offer, which matters for regulated European buyers.

Manatal: Does the AI scoring actually work?

It ranks reliably against structured requirements such as skills and experience length. It is far less reliable where enrichment data is sparse.

Share

Related pages

More on HackerRank

More on Manatal

Keep looking

Other head to heads