File Storage · head to head
Carbonite vs LucidLink

Carbonite
File Storage
Simple and reliable cloud backup for businesses
- From
- $6/month
- Rated
- -

LucidLink
File Storage
Cloud filesystem that streams large media files on demand instead of syncing them
- From
- $7/month
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Carbonite upload speeds are significantly slower than competitors due to lack of block-level algorithms and multithreading; LucidLink additional storage at $7 to $8 per 100GB per month is roughly three to four times raw S3 pricing, so teams with large cold archives pay a heavy premium for data they rarely touch.
- They diverge on capability: Carbonite covers Automatic backup, LucidLink covers Filespaces.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Carbonite and LucidLink actually diverge.
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (File Storage).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Carbonite
- Automatic backup
- Continuous protection
- Remote file access
- Bare metal restore
- Encryption
- Compliance support
- Microsoft 365
- Windows Server
Only in LucidLink
- Filespaces
- On-demand streaming
- Client-side encryption
- Customer-managed keys
- Bring your own storage
- Snapshots
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Carbonite
- Data protectionnot LucidLink
- Disaster recoverynot LucidLink
- Business continuitynot LucidLink
- Ransomware protectionnot LucidLink
- Compliancenot LucidLink
LucidLink
- A post house with editors in three countries cutting from one shared 4K rush library without shipping drivesnot Carbonite
- A broadcaster giving freelancers access to a project for a fortnight without provisioning VPN and a NAS mountnot Carbonite
- A game studio sharing multi-gigabyte asset builds where syncing every file to every workstation is impracticalnot Carbonite
- An architecture practice opening large point cloud and BIM files from a laptop on a hotel connectionnot Carbonite
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Carbonite
- Upload speeds are significantly slower than competitors due to lack of block-level algorithms and multithreading
- Bandwidth throttling control is limited, preventing users from managing full bandwidth allocation
- Mobile apps and web access are more limited than sync-first services like Dropbox or Google Drive
- Uses AES-128 encryption instead of industry-standard AES-256
- Hybrid backup support is restricted to professional plans, unavailable for personal users
LucidLink
- Additional storage at $7 to $8 per 100GB per month is roughly three to four times raw S3 pricing, so teams with large cold archives pay a heavy premium for data they rarely touch.
- Included storage is pooled per member, so adding a seat is also how you buy capacity, and teams with a few heavy users and many light ones buy seats purely for the gigabytes.
- Performance is bounded by the network link and local cache size, so a workstation with a small cache on a poor connection performs far worse than the demonstrations suggest.
- Small-file and metadata-heavy workloads such as code repositories, node modules trees or build outputs perform badly, so it is not a general-purpose file server replacement.
- Customer-managed keys and bring your own storage are Enterprise-tier options, so organisations that cannot let a vendor hold their keys cannot use the published pricing at all.
Pricing, plan by plan
Carbonite
$6/month- Basic$6/month
- Automatic backup
- Unlimited cloud storage
- Easy restore
LucidLink
$7/month- Starter$7/month
- 100GB included per member, pooled across the team
- Additional storage $7 per 100GB per month
- Client-side encryption
- Business$32/month
- $27 per member per month billed annually
- 400GB included per member, pooled across the team
- Additional storage $8 per 100GB per month
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Custom pricing and storage terms
- Customer-managed encryption keys
- Bring your own object storage bucket
Which should you pick?
Choose Carbonite if
- You need automatic backup.
- You work on Windows, Mac, Web.
- You also want continuous protection.
Choose LucidLink if
- You need filespaces.
- You work on macOS, Windows, Linux, iOS.
- You also want on-demand streaming.
Questions people ask
- Is Carbonite or LucidLink better?
- Neither clearly leads. Carbonite starts at $6/month and LucidLink at $7/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Carbonite or LucidLink?
- Carbonite starts at $6/month and LucidLink at $7/month.
- Does Carbonite or LucidLink run on more platforms?
- Carbonite runs on Windows, Mac, Web. LucidLink runs on macOS, Windows, Linux, iOS.
- What is Carbonite best used for?
- Carbonite is most often used for data protection, disaster recovery, business continuity, ransomware protection. Of those, data protection and disaster recovery are not what LucidLink is typically brought in for.
- What can Carbonite do that LucidLink cannot?
- Carbonite covers Automatic backup, Continuous protection, Remote file access, Bare metal restore. LucidLink covers Filespaces, On-demand streaming, Client-side encryption, Customer-managed keys.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Carbonite: Does Carbonite offer unlimited storage?
Yes, Carbonite's personal plans (Safe Basic through Safe Server Ultimate) offer unlimited cloud storage, though business plans have tiered storage starting at 250 GB.
SourceLucidLink: What does storage actually cost?
$7 per 100GB per month on Starter and $8 per 100GB per month on Business, above the pooled allowance. Model this separately from the seat cost.
Carbonite: What is Carbonite's pricing?
Personal plans range from $4.91 to $83.33 per month with annual billing. Business plans start around $50-$75 per endpoint annually, with volume discounts available for multi-year contracts.
SourceLucidLink: Can we hold our own encryption keys?
On the Enterprise tier, yes, along with pointing the filespace at your own S3 or Azure bucket. Not on Starter or Business.
Carbonite: How fast are Carbonite's upload speeds?
Carbonite's upload speeds are notably slow and are consistently identified as the platform's main weakness. The lack of block-level algorithms and multithreading contributes to these speed limitations.
SourceLucidLink: Does it work for source code?
Not well. It is built for large sequential reads. Many small files is the workload it handles worst.
Carbonite: What encryption does Carbonite use?
Carbonite uses AES-128 encryption at rest, which is an unusual choice in 2026 when AES-256 is the industry standard.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Carbonite vs Backblaze
- Carbonite vs Duplicati
- Carbonite vs CrashPlan
- Carbonite vs Zerto
- Carbonite vs Arq Backup
- Carbonite vs TrueNAS
- Carbonite vs Box
- Carbonite vs IDrive
- Carbonite vs Tresorit
- Carbonite vs Veritas NetBackup
- Carbonite vs Barracuda Backup
- Carbonite vs Microsoft OneDrive
- Carbonite vs Sync.com
- Carbonite vs Tigris
- Carbonite vs VAST Data
- Carbonite vs Cloudian
- Carbonite vs Nasuni
- Carbonite vs Panzura
- Carbonite vs Ceph
- Carbonite vs Google Drive
- Carbonite vs Nextcloud
- Carbonite vs Cloudflare R2
- Carbonite vs Scality RING
- LucidLink vs Backblaze
- LucidLink vs Duplicati
- LucidLink vs CrashPlan
- LucidLink vs Zerto
- LucidLink vs Arq Backup
- LucidLink vs TrueNAS
- LucidLink vs Box
- LucidLink vs IDrive
- LucidLink vs Tresorit
- LucidLink vs Veritas NetBackup
- LucidLink vs Barracuda Backup
- LucidLink vs Microsoft OneDrive
- LucidLink vs Sync.com
- LucidLink vs Tigris
- LucidLink vs VAST Data
- LucidLink vs Cloudian
- LucidLink vs Nasuni
- LucidLink vs Panzura
- LucidLink vs Ceph
- LucidLink vs Google Drive
- LucidLink vs Nextcloud
- LucidLink vs Cloudflare R2
- LucidLink vs Scality RING
