Translation · head to head
Lokalise vs MateCat

MateCat
Translation
Free, browser-based CAT tool under the LGPL, developed and hosted by the translation company Translated
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Lokalise there is no free tier; the entry Explorer plan starts at $144 per month; MateCat the hosted version most users rely on depends on Translated srl’s continued operation and infrastructure decisions, unlike a self-run desktop tool.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Lokalise and MateCat actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), platforms (Web), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Translation).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Lokalise
Nothing recorded that MateCat does not also cover.
Only in MateCat
- Browser-based CAT interface
- Machine translation suggestions
- Translation memory
- Quality assurance checks
- Project management
- File translation
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Lokalise
- Automating multi-product translation workflowsnot MateCat
- Integrating GitHub and GitLab for code localizationnot MateCat
- Translating Figma designs for global audiencesnot MateCat
- Maintaining consistency with translation memorynot MateCat
MateCat
- A freelance translator wanting a no-install, browser-based CAT tool with built-in machine translation suggestionsnot Lokalise
- A small agency wanting basic hosted project management without paying for a commercial TMSnot Lokalise
- A translator who wants MT suggestions from multiple engines surfaced alongside translation memory matches in one interfacenot Lokalise
- A team occasionally needing quick file translation through a browser without setting up desktop softwarenot Lokalise
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Lokalise
- There is no free tier; the entry Explorer plan starts at $144 per month
- Multi-product workflow support requires the $999 per month Advanced plan
- Enterprise security and support features are gated behind a custom quote
MateCat
- The hosted version most users rely on depends on Translated srl’s continued operation and infrastructure decisions, unlike a self-run desktop tool.
- It is developed by a commercial translation company whose own paid services sit alongside the free tool, which is worth being aware of when evaluating vendor neutrality.
- Being browser-based, it requires a stable internet connection, unlike OmegaT’s fully offline desktop application.
- Advanced terminology management and enterprise-scale project features are more limited than a paid commercial TMS such as memoQ or Smartling.
- Self-hosting the open source LGPL code independently of Translated’s hosted service requires technical setup effort that most individual translators are unlikely to undertake.
Pricing, plan by plan
Lokalise
Free- Explorer$144/month
- Entry-level tier
- Glossaries
- Translation memory
- Growth$375/month
- Enhanced automation
- Custom triggers
- Templates
- Advanced$999/month
- Complex multi-product workflows
- Most popular tier
- Advanced AI capabilities
- Enterprise$null/custom
- Custom SLA
- Specialized security
- Dedicated support
MateCat
Free- MateCatFree
- Free browser-based CAT tool, LGPL licensed
- Hosted and operated by Translated srl
Which should you pick?
Choose MateCat if
- You need browser-based cat interface.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want machine translation suggestions.
Questions people ask
- Is Lokalise or MateCat better?
- Neither clearly leads. Lokalise starts at Free and MateCat at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Lokalise or MateCat?
- Lokalise starts at Free and MateCat at Free.
- Does Lokalise or MateCat run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- Can I use Lokalise for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Lokalise best used for?
- Lokalise is most often used for automating multi-product translation workflows, integrating github and gitlab for code localization, translating figma designs for global audiences, maintaining consistency with translation memory. Of those, automating multi-product translation workflows and integrating github and gitlab for code localization are not what MateCat is typically brought in for.
- What can Lokalise do that MateCat cannot?
- MateCat covers Browser-based CAT interface, Machine translation suggestions, Translation memory, Quality assurance checks.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Lokalise: How much does Lokalise cost?
Lokalise offers Explorer plan at $144/month for basic translation features, Growth at $375/month for enhanced automation, and Advanced at $999/month for complex workflows. Enterprise plans require custom quotes. All pricing is for monthly billing with no setup fees.
SourceMateCat: Is MateCat really free?
Yes, it is free to use as a hosted browser-based tool and released as open source under the LGPL.
Lokalise: Does Lokalise offer a free trial?
Yes, Lokalise provides a 14-day free trial for all plans with no credit card required, giving full access to evaluate features before committing to a paid subscription.
SourceMateCat: Who maintains MateCat?
Translated srl, an Italian translation company, develops and hosts it; this differs from OmegaT, which is maintained by a volunteer open source community.
Lokalise: What features does Lokalise's Advanced plan add?
The Advanced plan ($999/month) is designed for teams with complex, multi-product workflows. It includes all Growth features plus advanced AI capabilities, 24/7 support, and a dedicated account manager.
SourceMateCat: Can I self-host MateCat instead of using Translated’s hosted version?
The code is open source under the LGPL and technically self-hostable, but doing so requires meaningful technical setup most individual users skip in favour of the hosted service.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Lokalise vs Transifex
- Lokalise vs Crowdin
- Lokalise vs Phrase
- Lokalise vs memoQ
- Lokalise vs DeepL
- Lokalise vs Weglot
- Lokalise vs POEditor
- Lokalise vs Smartling
- Lokalise vs Twine
- Lokalise vs Google Translate
- Lokalise vs Gengo
- Lokalise vs Amazon Translate
- Lokalise vs XTM Cloud
- Lokalise vs Plunet
- Lokalise vs Reverso
- Lokalise vs Sonix
- Lokalise vs XTRF
- Lokalise vs OmegaT
- Lokalise vs Unbabel
- Lokalise vs SDL Trados Studio
- Lokalise vs Pontoon
- Lokalise vs Localazy
- Lokalise vs Wordbee
- Lokalise vs wxrks
- MateCat vs Transifex
- MateCat vs Crowdin
- MateCat vs Phrase
- MateCat vs memoQ
- MateCat vs DeepL
- MateCat vs Weglot
- MateCat vs POEditor
- MateCat vs Smartling
- MateCat vs Twine
- MateCat vs Google Translate
- MateCat vs Gengo
- MateCat vs Amazon Translate
- MateCat vs XTM Cloud
- MateCat vs Plunet
- MateCat vs Reverso
- MateCat vs Sonix
- MateCat vs XTRF
- MateCat vs OmegaT
- MateCat vs Unbabel
- MateCat vs SDL Trados Studio
- MateCat vs Pontoon
- MateCat vs Localazy
- MateCat vs Wordbee
- MateCat vs wxrks

