Softwr

Translation · head to head

MateCat vs Wordbee

MateCat logo

MateCat

Translation

Free, browser-based CAT tool under the LGPL, developed and hosted by the translation company Translated

From
Free
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite
Wordbee logo

Wordbee

Translation

Luxembourg translation management priced at a flat 150 EUR per power user per month, with translators and requesters not counted as seats

From
€150/month
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite

The short version

  • Only MateCat has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
  • Each has a real cost: MateCat the hosted version most users rely on depends on Translated srl’s continued operation and infrastructure decisions, unlike a self-run desktop tool.; Wordbee the terms of service reserve an annual price increase equal to consumer price inflation plus two percent, so a three-year cost model built on the first-year price will understate the third year by roughly a tenth even in low inflation.
  • They diverge on capability: MateCat covers Browser-based CAT interface, Wordbee covers Flat per power user pricing.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which MateCat and Wordbee actually diverge.

Attributes where MateCat and Wordbee differ
AttributeMateCatWordbee
Starting priceFree€150/month
Pricing modelOpen source, no licence feePer power user per month
Free tierYesNo
PlatformsWebWeb, API

Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Translation).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in MateCat

  • Browser-based CAT interface
  • Machine translation suggestions
  • Translation memory
  • Quality assurance checks
  • Project management
  • File translation

Only in Wordbee

  • Flat per power user pricing
  • Unlimited requesters
  • Business operations layer
  • CAT editor and translation memory
  • Agentic AI add-on
  • API on every plan

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

MateCat

  • A freelance translator wanting a no-install, browser-based CAT tool with built-in machine translation suggestionsnot Wordbee
  • A small agency wanting basic hosted project management without paying for a commercial TMSnot Wordbee
  • A translator who wants MT suggestions from multiple engines surfaced alongside translation memory matches in one interfacenot Wordbee
  • A team occasionally needing quick file translation through a browser without setting up desktop softwarenot Wordbee

Wordbee

  • An in-house localisation team whose word volume is rising faster than its headcount, where a per-seat price caps the billnot MateCat
  • A small or mid-sized language service provider that wants translation workflow and invoicing in one system rather than twonot MateCat
  • European buyers who need an EU-domiciled vendor and invoicing in euros, sterling or Swiss francsnot MateCat
  • Organisations with many occasional requesters submitting content, since requesters are free on every plannot MateCat

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

MateCat

  • The hosted version most users rely on depends on Translated srl’s continued operation and infrastructure decisions, unlike a self-run desktop tool.
  • It is developed by a commercial translation company whose own paid services sit alongside the free tool, which is worth being aware of when evaluating vendor neutrality.
  • Being browser-based, it requires a stable internet connection, unlike OmegaT’s fully offline desktop application.
  • Advanced terminology management and enterprise-scale project features are more limited than a paid commercial TMS such as memoQ or Smartling.
  • Self-hosting the open source LGPL code independently of Translated’s hosted service requires technical setup effort that most individual translators are unlikely to undertake.

Wordbee

  • The terms of service reserve an annual price increase equal to consumer price inflation plus two percent, so a three-year cost model built on the first-year price will understate the third year by roughly a tenth even in low inflation.
  • Setup is a separate, mandatory-feeling charge of 2,500 EUR for a standard cloud deployment or 5,000 EUR for a multi-provider one, which for a small team can exceed the first year of subscription for two power users.
  • The initial term is one year, it renews automatically, sixty days written notice is required to stop it, and fees are stated as non-cancellable and non-refundable, so an unhappy customer pays out the year.
  • The Agentic AI add-on starts at 5,400 EUR a year on top of the subscription and is billed separately, so the automation the product now markets most heavily is not in the 150 EUR figure at all.
  • It is a small Luxembourg company with a minority outside shareholder and no large investor behind it, which keeps the product focused but means fewer third-party consultants to hire and a smaller pool of people who already know the system.

Pricing, plan by plan

MateCat

Free
  • MateCatFree
    • Free browser-based CAT tool, LGPL licensed
    • Hosted and operated by Translated srl

Wordbee

€150/month
  • Essential$150/month
    • Per power user, billed annually
    • Translators and requesters not charged as power users
    • Also available in USD, GBP and CHF
  • Smart$150/month
    • Per power user, billed annually
    • Same headline rate as Essential, higher quotas and capabilities
  • Enterprise$150/month
    • Per power user, billed annually
    • 20 power users, 500 linguists
    • 5 TB storage
  • Infinity$undefined/year
    • Price not published, contact sales
    • Highest quota tier

Which should you pick?

Choose MateCat if

  • You need browser-based cat interface.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You also want machine translation suggestions.
MateCat review

Choose Wordbee if

  • You need flat per power user pricing.
  • You work on Web, API.
  • You also want unlimited requesters.
Wordbee review

Questions people ask

Is MateCat or Wordbee better?
Neither clearly leads. MateCat starts at Free and Wordbee at €150/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, MateCat or Wordbee?
MateCat has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for MateCat and €150/month for Wordbee.
Does MateCat or Wordbee run on more platforms?
MateCat runs on Web. Wordbee runs on Web, API.
Can I use MateCat for free?
Yes. MateCat has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Wordbee starts at €150/month.
What is MateCat best used for?
MateCat is most often used for a freelance translator wanting a no-install, browser-based cat tool with built-in machine translation suggestions, a small agency wanting basic hosted project management without paying for a commercial tms, a translator who wants mt suggestions from multiple engines surfaced alongside translation memory matches in one interface, a team occasionally needing quick file translation through a browser without setting up desktop software. Of those, a freelance translator wanting a no-install, browser-based cat tool with built-in machine translation suggestions and a small agency wanting basic hosted project management without paying for a commercial tms are not what Wordbee is typically brought in for.
What can MateCat do that Wordbee cannot?
MateCat covers Browser-based CAT interface, Machine translation suggestions, Translation memory, Quality assurance checks. Wordbee covers Flat per power user pricing, Unlimited requesters, Business operations layer, CAT editor and translation memory.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

MateCat: Is MateCat really free?

Yes, it is free to use as a hosted browser-based tool and released as open source under the LGPL.

Wordbee: Is Wordbee priced per word?

No. The vendor states explicitly that plans are priced per power user and billed annually, not per word or per project, which is the main reason to consider it over per-word competitors.

MateCat: Who maintains MateCat?

Translated srl, an Italian translation company, develops and hosts it; this differs from OmegaT, which is maintained by a volunteer open source community.

Wordbee: Who counts as a power user?

Project managers, administrators and team leads who manage workflows, assign jobs and configure the platform. Translators and reviewers are counted as linguists, and requesters who only submit content are unlimited and free.

MateCat: Can I self-host MateCat instead of using Translated’s hosted version?

The code is open source under the LGPL and technically self-hostable, but doing so requires meaningful technical setup most individual users skip in favour of the hosted service.

Wordbee: What is the real first-year cost?

The subscription plus a setup fee of 2,500 EUR or 5,000 EUR depending on deployment. Add the Agentic add-on from 5,400 EUR a year if you want the AI workflows.

Wordbee: Can I pay monthly?

No. The vendor states that all plans are billed annually, in EUR, USD, GBP or CHF.

Share

Related pages

More on MateCat

More on Wordbee

Keep looking

Other head to heads