Translation · head to head
Gengo vs MateCat

Gengo
Translation
Human translation marketplace and API, priced per word from $0.06, owned by Lionbridge since 2019
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

MateCat
Translation
Free, browser-based CAT tool under the LGPL, developed and hosted by the translation company Translated
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only MateCat has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Gengo it is not a fit for specialised legal, medical or literary translation, since the crowdsourced model is built for higher-volume, lower-complexity content.; MateCat the hosted version most users rely on depends on Translated srl’s continued operation and infrastructure decisions, unlike a self-run desktop tool.
- They diverge on capability: Gengo covers Standard and Pro quality tiers, MateCat covers Browser-based CAT interface.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Gengo and MateCat actually diverge.
Identical on both: platforms (Web), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Translation).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Gengo
- Standard and Pro quality tiers
- Developer API
- No minimum spend
- Crowdsourced translator network
- Bulk file upload
- CMS and platform integrations
Only in MateCat
- Browser-based CAT interface
- Machine translation suggestions
- Translation memory
- Quality assurance checks
- Project management
- File translation
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Gengo
- An e-commerce seller translating product listings into multiple languages without a minimum spend requirementnot MateCat
- A company integrating the Gengo API into a content pipeline to automatically route text for human translationnot MateCat
- A support team needing occasional human-translated responses without committing to Unbabel’s enterprise minimumnot MateCat
- A publisher needing straightforward, transparently priced human translation for shorter, lower-stakes contentnot MateCat
MateCat
- A freelance translator wanting a no-install, browser-based CAT tool with built-in machine translation suggestionsnot Gengo
- A small agency wanting basic hosted project management without paying for a commercial TMSnot Gengo
- A translator who wants MT suggestions from multiple engines surfaced alongside translation memory matches in one interfacenot Gengo
- A team occasionally needing quick file translation through a browser without setting up desktop softwarenot Gengo
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Gengo
- It is not a fit for specialised legal, medical or literary translation, since the crowdsourced model is built for higher-volume, lower-complexity content.
- Quality consistency depends on which individual translator from the crowdsourced network is assigned, which can vary more than a dedicated agency relationship would.
- Turnaround, while fast for its category, is still meaningfully slower than a machine translation API, since every job requires a human to complete it.
- Since being acquired by Lionbridge in 2019, Gengo’s product direction is now set within a much larger localisation company’s priorities rather than as an independent business.
- Per-word pricing, while transparent, is still substantially more expensive per unit of content than a machine translation API, so it is a poor fit for translating very large volumes of low-stakes content.
MateCat
- The hosted version most users rely on depends on Translated srl’s continued operation and infrastructure decisions, unlike a self-run desktop tool.
- It is developed by a commercial translation company whose own paid services sit alongside the free tool, which is worth being aware of when evaluating vendor neutrality.
- Being browser-based, it requires a stable internet connection, unlike OmegaT’s fully offline desktop application.
- Advanced terminology management and enterprise-scale project features are more limited than a paid commercial TMS such as memoQ or Smartling.
- Self-hosting the open source LGPL code independently of Translated’s hosted service requires technical setup effort that most individual translators are unlikely to undertake.
Pricing, plan by plan
Gengo
On request- Standard$0.06/month
- Human translation, $0.06 per word starting rate
- No minimum spend or setup fee
- Pro$undefined/month
- Higher-quality tier, rate varies by language pair and content type
- Human translation with additional review
MateCat
Free- MateCatFree
- Free browser-based CAT tool, LGPL licensed
- Hosted and operated by Translated srl
Which should you pick?
Choose MateCat if
- You need browser-based cat interface.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want machine translation suggestions.
Questions people ask
- Is Gengo or MateCat better?
- Neither clearly leads. Gengo starts at On request and MateCat at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Gengo or MateCat?
- MateCat has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Gengo and Free for MateCat.
- Does Gengo or MateCat run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- Can I use MateCat for free?
- Yes. MateCat has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Gengo starts at On request.
- What is Gengo best used for?
- Gengo is most often used for an e-commerce seller translating product listings into multiple languages without a minimum spend requirement, a company integrating the gengo api into a content pipeline to automatically route text for human translation, a support team needing occasional human-translated responses without committing to unbabel’s enterprise minimum, a publisher needing straightforward, transparently priced human translation for shorter, lower-stakes content. Of those, an e-commerce seller translating product listings into multiple languages without a minimum spend requirement and a company integrating the gengo api into a content pipeline to automatically route text for human translation are not what MateCat is typically brought in for.
- What can Gengo do that MateCat cannot?
- Gengo covers Standard and Pro quality tiers, Developer API, No minimum spend, Crowdsourced translator network. MateCat covers Browser-based CAT interface, Machine translation suggestions, Translation memory, Quality assurance checks.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Gengo: Is Gengo machine translation or human translation?
Human translation. It should be compared with Unbabel, not with Google Translate, Microsoft Translator or Amazon Translate, which are machine translation APIs.
MateCat: Is MateCat really free?
Yes, it is free to use as a hosted browser-based tool and released as open source under the LGPL.
Gengo: Is there a minimum spend?
No, Gengo publishes per-word pricing with no minimum spend or setup fee, unlike Unbabel’s enterprise-gated rate structure.
MateCat: Who maintains MateCat?
Translated srl, an Italian translation company, develops and hosts it; this differs from OmegaT, which is maintained by a volunteer open source community.
Gengo: Who owns Gengo?
Lionbridge, a larger localisation and AI data services company, acquired Gengo in January 2019.
MateCat: Can I self-host MateCat instead of using Translated’s hosted version?
The code is open source under the LGPL and technically self-hostable, but doing so requires meaningful technical setup most individual users skip in favour of the hosted service.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Gengo vs Unbabel
- Gengo vs Google Translate
- Gengo vs Reverso
- Gengo vs Microsoft Translator
- Gengo vs Amazon Translate
- Gengo vs DeepL
- Gengo vs Systran
- Gengo vs Smartcat
- Gengo vs Wordbee
- Gengo vs OmegaT
- Gengo vs POEditor
- Gengo vs Pontoon
- Gengo vs SDL Trados Studio
- Gengo vs Smartling
- Gengo vs Twine
- Gengo vs XTM Cloud
- Gengo vs XTRF
- Gengo vs Localazy
- Gengo vs Sonix
- Gengo vs wxrks
- MateCat vs Unbabel
- MateCat vs Google Translate
- MateCat vs Reverso
- MateCat vs Microsoft Translator
- MateCat vs Amazon Translate
- MateCat vs DeepL
- MateCat vs Systran
- MateCat vs Smartcat
- MateCat vs Wordbee
- MateCat vs OmegaT
- MateCat vs POEditor
- MateCat vs Pontoon
- MateCat vs SDL Trados Studio
- MateCat vs Smartling
- MateCat vs Twine
- MateCat vs XTM Cloud
- MateCat vs XTRF
- MateCat vs Localazy
- MateCat vs Sonix
- MateCat vs wxrks
