Cybersecurity · head to head
LogicManager vs MyRec.com

LogicManager
Cybersecurity
Enterprise risk management priced as a flat fee with unlimited users
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No

MyRec.com
Government
Recreation management for small parks departments, priced on your annual revenue with no contract
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Each has a real cost: LogicManager the flat fee is quoted per organisation and not published, so the pricing model that makes LogicManager attractive still cannot be compared without a sales process.; MyRec.com the annual fee scales with department revenue, so a successful department pays more for the same software as its programme income grows.
- They diverge on capability: LogicManager covers Risk taxonomy, MyRec.com covers Revenue-based annual fee.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which LogicManager and MyRec.com actually diverge.
| Attribute | LogicManager | MyRec.com |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | quote | Per year by department annual revenue |
| Category | Cybersecurity | Government |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), free tier (No), platforms (Web), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in LogicManager
- Risk taxonomy
- Unlimited users
- Risk assessments
- Third-party risk
- Internal audit
- Policy management
- Incident management
- Advisory support
Only in MyRec.com
- Revenue-based annual fee
- Programme registration
- Facility reservations
- Point of sale
- League scheduling
- Everything included
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
LogicManager
- A mid-sized bank or credit union that needs every department head contributing to risk assessment without paying for a seat eachnot MyRec.com
- A risk team replacing a spreadsheet register that cannot show which controls a given vendor failure would affectnot MyRec.com
- An organisation preparing for a regulatory examination that must evidence a linked risk, control and issue trailnot MyRec.com
- A company consolidating separate vendor risk, policy and audit tools onto one taxonomy so findings are not duplicatednot MyRec.com
MyRec.com
- A town recreation department of one or two staff moving off paper registration forms and a shared spreadsheetnot LogicManager
- A department that wants to choose its own payment processor rather than accept the software vendor ratenot LogicManager
- Replacing a system that charges per module, where every new programme type triggered an upsellnot LogicManager
- A department needing field permits and league scheduling without buying a facilities management suitenot LogicManager
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
LogicManager
- The flat fee is quoted per organisation and not published, so the pricing model that makes LogicManager attractive still cannot be compared without a sales process.
- Configuration depth means the taxonomy has to be designed properly before rollout, and organisations that skip that step end up with a structure that cannot answer the linkage questions the tool exists to answer.
- Reporting and dashboarding are functional rather than flexible, and teams wanting bespoke board reporting commonly export to Power BI, which reintroduces the manual step they were removing.
- Quantitative risk modelling is limited compared with specialist tools, so organisations needing Monte Carlo style loss simulation will need something else alongside it.
- The user interface is dated relative to newer compliance automation tools, and infrequent business users often need repeat training, which erodes the participation benefit that unlimited licensing is supposed to deliver.
MyRec.com
- The annual fee scales with department revenue, so a successful department pays more for the same software as its programme income grows.
- It is built for small and mid-sized departments and lacks the permitting, aquatics and multi-facility depth a large city requires.
- Credit card processing is explicitly excluded from the fee, so the total cost depends on a merchant agreement the department must source and negotiate itself.
- Integration surface is thin, with no meaningful connection to municipal ERP or finance systems, meaning revenue reconciliation is a manual export.
- The vendor is small, so there is limited third-party consulting capacity and a narrow bench for support during peak registration periods.
Pricing, plan by plan
LogicManager
On request- LogicManager Platform$undefined/year
- Fixed annual fee, unlimited users
- Risk, audit, vendor, policy and incident modules
- Advisory analyst support included
MyRec.com
On request- MyRec.com$undefined/year
- Single annual fee calculated from department annual revenue
- Third parties report entry around 2,850 to 3,445 USD per year
- Site build, onboarding and training included
Which should you pick?
Choose MyRec.com if
- You need revenue-based annual fee.
- You also want programme registration.
Questions people ask
- Is LogicManager or MyRec.com better?
- Neither clearly leads. LogicManager starts at On request and MyRec.com at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, LogicManager or MyRec.com?
- LogicManager starts at On request and MyRec.com at On request.
- Does LogicManager or MyRec.com run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- What is LogicManager best used for?
- LogicManager is most often used for a mid-sized bank or credit union that needs every department head contributing to risk assessment without paying for a seat each, a risk team replacing a spreadsheet register that cannot show which controls a given vendor failure would affect, an organisation preparing for a regulatory examination that must evidence a linked risk, control and issue trail, a company consolidating separate vendor risk, policy and audit tools onto one taxonomy so findings are not duplicated. Of those, a mid-sized bank or credit union that needs every department head contributing to risk assessment without paying for a seat each and a risk team replacing a spreadsheet register that cannot show which controls a given vendor failure would affect are not what MyRec.com is typically brought in for.
- What can LogicManager do that MyRec.com cannot?
- LogicManager covers Risk taxonomy, Unlimited users, Risk assessments, Third-party risk. MyRec.com covers Revenue-based annual fee, Programme registration, Facility reservations, Point of sale.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
LogicManager: Is LogicManager really unlimited users?
Yes. It licences on a fixed annual fee covering the organisation rather than per seat, which is the main reason mid-market buyers pick it.
MyRec.com: How is MyRec priced?
A single annual fee calculated from your department annual revenue, using a calculator on the MyRec site. Third parties report entry around 2,850 to 3,445 USD a year.
LogicManager: What does it cost?
Not published. Mid-market ERM platforms of this class typically sit in the low tens of thousands of dollars a year, quoted by scope.
MyRec.com: Is there a setup fee?
No. Site build, onboarding and training are included in the annual fee.
LogicManager: Is it a compliance automation tool like Drata?
No. It is enterprise risk management with audit and vendor risk, not continuous control monitoring for SOC 2 evidence collection.
MyRec.com: Are card fees included?
No. Credit card processing is separate and you arrange your own merchant account.
LogicManager: How long does implementation take?
Weeks to a few months, far shorter than the enterprise GRC suites, provided the risk taxonomy is agreed up front.
MyRec.com: Is there a contract?
No long-term contract is required, which is unusual in municipal software.
Related pages
More on LogicManager
Other head to heads
- LogicManager vs Resolver
- LogicManager vs Diligent
- LogicManager vs MetricStream
- LogicManager vs Drata
- LogicManager vs Silent Eight
- LogicManager vs NICE Actimize
- LogicManager vs Rhombus Systems
- LogicManager vs Trulioo
- LogicManager vs Trend Micro Vision One
- LogicManager vs IBM QRadar
- LogicManager vs Motorola Vigilant
- LogicManager vs VMware Carbon Black
- LogicManager vs Quantexa
- LogicManager vs Termly
- LogicManager vs Transcend
- LogicManager vs WireGuard
- LogicManager vs Akeyless
- LogicManager vs DataGrail
- LogicManager vs CivicPlus
- LogicManager vs OpenGov
- LogicManager vs RecDesk
- LogicManager vs Euna Solutions
- LogicManager vs Springbrook Software
- LogicManager vs Periscope Holdings
- LogicManager vs NEXGEN Asset Management
- LogicManager vs CentralSquare Asset Management
- LogicManager vs GovPilot
- LogicManager vs eCode360
- LogicManager vs Trimble Unity Maintain
- LogicManager vs IAPro
- LogicManager vs iCompass
- LogicManager vs Mapbox Government
- LogicManager vs Mark43
- LogicManager vs MuckRock
- LogicManager vs Municode
- LogicManager vs Rock Solid
- MyRec.com vs Resolver
- MyRec.com vs Diligent
- MyRec.com vs MetricStream
- MyRec.com vs Drata
- MyRec.com vs Silent Eight
- MyRec.com vs NICE Actimize
- MyRec.com vs Rhombus Systems
- MyRec.com vs Trulioo
- MyRec.com vs Trend Micro Vision One
- MyRec.com vs IBM QRadar
- MyRec.com vs Motorola Vigilant
- MyRec.com vs VMware Carbon Black
- MyRec.com vs Quantexa
- MyRec.com vs Termly
- MyRec.com vs Transcend
- MyRec.com vs WireGuard
- MyRec.com vs Akeyless
- MyRec.com vs DataGrail
- MyRec.com vs CivicPlus
- MyRec.com vs OpenGov
- MyRec.com vs RecDesk
- MyRec.com vs Euna Solutions
- MyRec.com vs Springbrook Software
- MyRec.com vs Periscope Holdings
- MyRec.com vs NEXGEN Asset Management
- MyRec.com vs CentralSquare Asset Management
- MyRec.com vs GovPilot
- MyRec.com vs eCode360
- MyRec.com vs Trimble Unity Maintain
- MyRec.com vs IAPro
- MyRec.com vs iCompass
- MyRec.com vs Mapbox Government
- MyRec.com vs Mark43
- MyRec.com vs MuckRock
- MyRec.com vs Municode
- MyRec.com vs Rock Solid
