Softwr

Project Management · head to head

LiquidPlanner vs WarpBuild

LiquidPlanner logo

LiquidPlanner

Project Management

Predictive project management

From
On request
Free plan
No
Visit LiquidPlannerFull review
WarpBuild logo

WarpBuild

Developer Tools

2x faster, 50% cheaper GitHub Actions runners

From
On request
Free plan
No
Visit WarpBuildFull review

The short version

  • LiquidPlanner is a predictive project management solution; WarpBuild is a GitHub Actions runner service.
  • LiquidPlanner starts at $15/mo, WarpBuild at $0.002/mo.
  • Only LiquidPlanner lists predictive scheduling; only WarpBuild lists optimized runner infrastructure.
  • Where LiquidPlanner falls short: rebranded to Tempo Portfolio Manager; the pricing page shows no published figures, only an early access sign-up.
  • Where WarpBuild falls short: per-minute pricing requires tracking usage to estimate monthly costs.
  • Prices and features on this page were last checked on 13 November 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which LiquidPlanner and WarpBuild actually diverge.

Attributes where LiquidPlanner and WarpBuild differ
AttributeLiquidPlannerWarpBuild
Pricing modelSubscriptionUsage-based per minute, varies by runner configuration
PlatformsWebGitHub Actions, Linux, Windows, macOS, Web
CategoryProject ManagementDeveloper Tools

Identical on both: starting price (On request), free tier (No).

Not yet recorded: founded for WarpBuild.

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in LiquidPlanner

  • Predictive scheduling
  • Resource management
  • Time tracking
  • Analytics
  • Workload management
  • Jira
  • Salesforce
  • Slack

Only in WarpBuild

  • Optimized runner infrastructure
  • Intelligent caching
  • Incremental builds
  • Multi-architecture support
  • Unlimited concurrency
  • Autoscaling
  • BYOC support
  • Docker builders

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

LiquidPlanner

  • Productivitynot WarpBuild
  • Collaborationnot WarpBuild
  • Task managementnot WarpBuild
  • Organizationnot WarpBuild

WarpBuild

  • Accelerating CI builds for teams with high test volumesnot LiquidPlanner
  • Running tests generated by AI coding assistants efficientlynot LiquidPlanner
  • Reducing GitHub Actions costs by 50% or morenot LiquidPlanner
  • Supporting teams that need ARM64 architecture runnersnot LiquidPlanner

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

LiquidPlanner

  • Rebranded to Tempo Portfolio Manager; the pricing page shows no published figures, only an early access sign-up

WarpBuild

  • Per-minute pricing requires tracking usage to estimate monthly costs
  • Large configuration runners (32 vCPU) expensive at $0.064/min
  • macOS M4 Pro 12-core at $0.16/min is highest-cost option
  • BYOC option requires cloud setup by customer

Pricing, plan by plan

LiquidPlanner

On request
  • Essentials$15/mo
    • Project management
    • Basic scheduling
  • Professional$25/mo
    • Predictive scheduling
    • Resource management
    • Analytics

WarpBuild

On request
  • Linux x86-64 (2vCPU, 8GB)$0.004/minute
    • 2 vCPU
    • 8 GB RAM
    • Standard performance
  • Linux x86-64 (4vCPU, 16GB)$0.008/minute
    • 4 vCPU
    • 16 GB RAM
    • Increased performance
  • Linux x86-64 (8vCPU, 32GB)$0.016/minute
    • 8 vCPU
    • 32 GB RAM
    • High performance
  • Linux x86-64 (16vCPU, 64GB)$0.032/minute
    • 16 vCPU
    • 64 GB RAM
    • Enterprise performance

Which should you pick?

Choose LiquidPlanner if

  • You need predictive scheduling.
  • You also want resource management.
LiquidPlanner review

Choose WarpBuild if

  • You need optimized runner infrastructure.
  • You work on GitHub Actions, Linux, Windows, macOS, Web.
  • You also want intelligent caching.
WarpBuild review

Questions people ask

Is LiquidPlanner or WarpBuild better?
Neither clearly leads. LiquidPlanner starts at On request and WarpBuild at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, LiquidPlanner or WarpBuild?
LiquidPlanner starts at On request and WarpBuild at On request.
Does LiquidPlanner or WarpBuild run on more platforms?
LiquidPlanner runs on Web. WarpBuild runs on GitHub Actions, Linux, Windows, macOS, Web.
What is LiquidPlanner best used for?
LiquidPlanner is most often used for productivity, collaboration, task management, organization. Of those, productivity and collaboration are not what WarpBuild is typically brought in for.
What can LiquidPlanner do that WarpBuild cannot?
LiquidPlanner covers Predictive scheduling, Resource management, Time tracking, Analytics. WarpBuild covers Optimized runner infrastructure, Intelligent caching, Incremental builds, Multi-architecture support.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

LiquidPlanner: How is Tempo timesheets pricing calculated for my organization?

Pricing is per-user per month and scales based on organization size. For 1-10 users: $1.00/user; 11-100 users: $5.21/user; 101-250 users: $3.66/user; scaling down to $0.25-$0.39/user for organizations with 5,000+ users.

Source
WarpBuild: How much cheaper is WarpBuild compared to GitHub Actions?

WarpBuild offers approximately 50% cost savings compared to GitHub-hosted runners. For example, Linux x86-64 2vCPU/8GB costs $0.004/min with WarpBuild vs $0.008/min with GitHub Actions.

Source
LiquidPlanner: What license matching requirement exists for Tempo?

Your Tempo license size must match your Jira license size, with a user defined as anyone who can log into Jira.

Source
WarpBuild: What is BYOC and how does it differ from managed runners?

BYOC (Bring Your Own Cloud) allows customers to run WarpBuild on their own cloud infrastructure at $0.002/min. Managed runners use WarpBuild's cloud infrastructure. BYOC provides lower costs but requires customer setup.

Source
LiquidPlanner: Is there a free trial for Tempo timesheets?

Yes, Tempo offers a free trial available through the Atlassian Marketplace.

Source
WarpBuild: Does WarpBuild support ARM64 runners?

Yes, WarpBuild offers ARM64 runners at lower costs than x86-64. Linux ARM64 starts at $0.003/min for 2vCPU/8GB configuration.

Source
LiquidPlanner: What deployment options are available for Tempo?

Both Cloud and Data Center deployment options are offered, with annual billing available.

Source
Share

Related pages

More on LiquidPlanner

More on WarpBuild

Keep looking

Other head to heads