Government · head to head
Legistar vs Ping Identity

Ping Identity
Cybersecurity
Enterprise identity for workforce and customers, with a 5,000 user floor
- From
- $3/month
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Legistar pricing is not published; sold by quote through a sales process; Ping Identity workforce pricing carries a 5,000 user annual minimum, so an organisation with 800 staff pays for 5,000 and the effective per user cost is over six times the list rate.
- They diverge on capability: Legistar covers Legislation Tracking, Ping Identity covers Single sign-on.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Legistar and Ping Identity actually diverge.
| Attribute | Legistar | Ping Identity |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | $3/month |
| Pricing model | quote | Per user per month |
| Platforms | Web | Web, Linux, Windows |
| Category | Government | Cybersecurity |
| Founded | 1999 | Unknown |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Legistar
- Legislation Tracking
- Meeting Agendas
- Voting Records
- Public Portal
- Document Management
- Video Streaming
- Microsoft Office
- Records Systems
Only in Ping Identity
- Single sign-on
- Adaptive MFA
- Identity orchestration
- API access management
- Directory services
- Flexible deployment
- ForgeRock capabilities
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Legistar
- Legislative agenda managementnot Ping Identity
- Meeting management and video processesnot Ping Identity
- Public records managementnot Ping Identity
- Government transparencynot Ping Identity
Ping Identity
- A bank that must keep identity data on premises in one country while running SaaS identity elsewherenot Legistar
- An airline or telco with tens of millions of customer identities needing a directory that holds that scalenot Legistar
- An enterprise assembling authentication journeys that call several external verification and risk vendorsnot Legistar
- An existing ForgeRock customer deciding what its upgrade path looks like under Ping ownershipnot Legistar
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Legistar
- Pricing is not published; sold by quote through a sales process
Ping Identity
- Workforce pricing carries a 5,000 user annual minimum, so an organisation with 800 staff pays for 5,000 and the effective per user cost is over six times the list rate.
- Adaptive multi-factor authentication is in the Plus tier only, doubling the per user price for a capability many buyers assume is standard in a modern identity platform.
- ForgeRock no longer exists as an independent product, so customers who chose it specifically to avoid Ping now face a roadmap set by the vendor they did not pick.
- Thoma Bravo ownership across both merged companies means the commercial priority is margin, and buyers report firmer renewal negotiations than they saw before 2022.
- The portfolio has overlapping components from three product lineages, so scoping a deployment requires vendor architects and the licensing conversation is more complicated than the price list implies.
Pricing, plan by plan
Legistar
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Legistar review.
Ping Identity
$3/month- PingOne for Workforce Essential$3/month
- Minimum 5,000 users billed annually
- Single sign-on and directory services
- OAuth 2.0, OpenID Connect, SAML and SCIM
- PingOne for Workforce Plus$6/month
- Minimum 5,000 users billed annually
- Everything in Essential
- Adaptive multi-factor authentication
- PingOne for Customers Essential$35000/year
- Flat annual fee
- No-code identity orchestration
- Unified customer profiles
- PingOne for Customers Plus$50000/year
- Flat annual fee
- Everything in Essential
- Adaptive MFA and device management
Which should you pick?
Choose Ping Identity if
- You need single sign-on.
- You work on Web, Linux, Windows.
- You also want adaptive mfa.
Questions people ask
- Is Legistar or Ping Identity better?
- Neither clearly leads. Legistar starts at On request and Ping Identity at $3/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Legistar or Ping Identity?
- Legistar starts at On request and Ping Identity at $3/month.
- Does Legistar or Ping Identity run on more platforms?
- Legistar runs on Web. Ping Identity runs on Web, Linux, Windows.
- What is Legistar best used for?
- Legistar is most often used for legislative agenda management, meeting management and video processes, public records management, government transparency. Of those, legislative agenda management and meeting management and video processes are not what Ping Identity is typically brought in for.
- What can Legistar do that Ping Identity cannot?
- Legistar covers Legislation Tracking, Meeting Agendas, Voting Records, Public Portal. Ping Identity covers Single sign-on, Adaptive MFA, Identity orchestration, API access management.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Ping Identity: Can I still buy ForgeRock?
Not as a separate product. Ping acquired ForgeRock in 2023 and the capabilities are sold within the Ping portfolio. Existing customers should ask about the specific migration path for their components.
Ping Identity: What is the real minimum spend?
PingOne for Workforce Essential is 3 USD per user per month with a 5,000 user annual minimum, so roughly 180,000 USD a year before anything else.
Ping Identity: Is MFA included?
Basic authentication policies are in Essential. Adaptive MFA and passwordless require the Plus tier at 6 USD per user per month.
Related pages
More on Ping Identity
Other head to heads
- Legistar vs OpenGov
- Legistar vs DocuWare
- Legistar vs Accela
- Legistar vs CivicPlus
- Legistar vs CityView
- Legistar vs Laserfiche
- Legistar vs Socrata
- Legistar vs NextRequest
- Legistar vs MuckRock
- Legistar vs ClearGov
- Legistar vs iCompass
- Legistar vs Polco
- Legistar vs CKAN
- Legistar vs Clariti
- Legistar vs DataSF
- Legistar vs Google Cloud for Government
- Legistar vs GovPilot
- Legistar vs CivicPlus Asset Management
- Legistar vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Legistar vs Frontegg
- Legistar vs Speakeasy
- Legistar vs Akeyless
- Legistar vs authentik
- Legistar vs Logto
- Legistar vs Authelia
- Legistar vs Transmit Security
- Legistar vs Delinea
- Legistar vs Genetec Security Center
- Legistar vs VMware Carbon Black
- Legistar vs Rhombus Systems
- Legistar vs Yoti
- Legistar vs Avast One
- Legistar vs Chainguard
- Legistar vs Cosign
- Legistar vs CyberGhost VPN
- Ping Identity vs OpenGov
- Ping Identity vs DocuWare
- Ping Identity vs Accela
- Ping Identity vs CivicPlus
- Ping Identity vs CityView
- Ping Identity vs Laserfiche
- Ping Identity vs Socrata
- Ping Identity vs NextRequest
- Ping Identity vs MuckRock
- Ping Identity vs ClearGov
- Ping Identity vs iCompass
- Ping Identity vs Polco
- Ping Identity vs CKAN
- Ping Identity vs Clariti
- Ping Identity vs DataSF
- Ping Identity vs Google Cloud for Government
- Ping Identity vs GovPilot
- Ping Identity vs CivicPlus Asset Management
- Ping Identity vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Ping Identity vs Frontegg
- Ping Identity vs Speakeasy
- Ping Identity vs Akeyless
- Ping Identity vs authentik
- Ping Identity vs Logto
- Ping Identity vs Authelia
- Ping Identity vs Transmit Security
- Ping Identity vs Delinea
- Ping Identity vs Genetec Security Center
- Ping Identity vs VMware Carbon Black
- Ping Identity vs Rhombus Systems
- Ping Identity vs Yoti
- Ping Identity vs Avast One
- Ping Identity vs Chainguard
- Ping Identity vs Cosign
- Ping Identity vs CyberGhost VPN

