APIs · head to head
Kong Gateway vs Vagrant

Kong Gateway
APIs
Open-source and cloud API gateway for managing microservices traffic
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Kong Gateway the free open-source gateway lacks the analytics, portals, and support of the paid Konnect tiers.; Vagrant vagrant 2.4.3 and later is licensed under the Business Source License 1.1 with IBM Corporation as licensor, not an OSI open source licence
- They diverge on capability: Kong Gateway covers API request routing, Vagrant covers Box management.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Kong Gateway and Vagrant actually diverge.
| Attribute | Kong Gateway | Vagrant |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | freemium | open-source |
| Platforms | web, linux, api | Linux, Windows, Mac |
| Category | APIs | Cloud |
| Founded | 2017 | 2010 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Kong Gateway
- API request routing
- Plugin ecosystem
- Developer portals
- AI Gateway
- Analytics and observability
- SSO and audit logs
Only in Vagrant
- Box management
- Provider support
- Multi-machine setups
- Provisioners
- Networking
- Synced folders
- Snapshots
- Plugins
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Kong Gateway
- Routing and securing traffic across microservicesnot Vagrant
- Publishing internal or external developer portalsnot Vagrant
- Managing rate limits and authentication at the API edgenot Vagrant
- Gateway-level routing to multiple LLM providersnot Vagrant
Vagrant
- Reproducible local development environments defined in a Vagrantfilenot Kong Gateway
- Provisioning identical VMs across VirtualBox, VMware and Hyper-V for a teamnot Kong Gateway
- Sandboxing multi-machine setups on a developer laptopnot Kong Gateway
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Kong Gateway
- The free open-source gateway lacks the analytics, portals, and support of the paid Konnect tiers.
- Plus tier caps API requests at 1M/month before incurring per-million overage charges.
- Enterprise pricing is custom and not published, making budgeting harder without sales contact.
- Configuration and plugin management can require significant operational expertise to run at scale.
Vagrant
- Vagrant 2.4.3 and later is licensed under the Business Source License 1.1 with IBM Corporation as licensor, not an OSI open source licence
- The Additional Use Grant forbids offering Vagrant to third parties on a hosted or embedded basis in a paid product that competes with IBM's paid versions of Vagrant
- Each version converts to the MPL 2.0 Change License only four years after that version is first published
- Uses that fall outside the Additional Use Grant require a separately negotiated licence from the licensor
Pricing, plan by plan
Kong Gateway
Free- Free TrialFree
- 30-day enterprise functionality trial
- Unlimited gateways
- 30-day analytics retention
- Plus$undefined/month
- Up to 5 serverless, 2 hybrid, 2 dedicated cloud gateways
- 1M API requests/month included
- Up to 2 developer portals
- Enterprise$undefined/month
- Unlimited hybrid and dedicated cloud gateways
- Unlimited developer portals
- SSO and audit logs
Vagrant
Free- Open SourceFree
- Development environment provisioning
- Multiple providers
- Provisioner support
Which should you pick?
Choose Kong Gateway if
- You need api request routing.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on web, linux, api.
- You also want plugin ecosystem.
Choose Vagrant if
- You need box management.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Windows, Mac.
- You also want provider support.
Questions people ask
- Is Kong Gateway or Vagrant better?
- Neither clearly leads. Kong Gateway starts at Free and Vagrant at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Kong Gateway or Vagrant?
- Kong Gateway starts at Free and Vagrant at Free.
- Does Kong Gateway or Vagrant run on more platforms?
- Kong Gateway runs on web, linux, api. Vagrant runs on Linux, Windows, Mac.
- Can I use Kong Gateway for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Kong Gateway best used for?
- Kong Gateway is most often used for routing and securing traffic across microservices, publishing internal or external developer portals, managing rate limits and authentication at the api edge, gateway-level routing to multiple llm providers. Of those, routing and securing traffic across microservices and publishing internal or external developer portals are not what Vagrant is typically brought in for.
- What can Kong Gateway do that Vagrant cannot?
- Kong Gateway covers API request routing, Plugin ecosystem, Developer portals, AI Gateway. Vagrant covers Box management, Provider support, Multi-machine setups, Provisioners.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Kong Gateway: Is Kong Gateway free?
Kong's core gateway is open source and free to self-host. Kong Konnect, the managed cloud platform, offers a 30-day free trial before moving to paid Plus or custom Enterprise pricing.
SourceVagrant: Is Vagrant free to use?
Vagrant is a free, open-source command-line utility for managing virtual machine lifecycles.
SourceKong Gateway: How is usage metered on the Plus plan?
The Plus plan includes 1M API requests per month, with additional usage billed at $200 per extra 1 million requests up to a 10M/month cap, plus per-gateway and per-LLM-model charges.
SourceVagrant: Does Vagrant offer a paid tier?
Vagrant itself is free. HashiCorp offers a HCP Vagrant Registry with a free tier for use with Vagrant.
SourceKong Gateway: What support is included?
Plus includes email support with a 2-business-day SLA, while Enterprise adds dedicated success managers and professional services.
SourceRelated pages
More on Kong Gateway
Other head to heads
- Kong Gateway vs Tyk
- Kong Gateway vs Moesif
- Kong Gateway vs Treblle
- Kong Gateway vs Convoy
- Kong Gateway vs Janus Gateway
- Kong Gateway vs Spring Cloud Gateway
- Kong Gateway vs Gravitee
- Kong Gateway vs Strapi
- Kong Gateway vs WSO2 API Manager
- Kong Gateway vs AWS API Gateway
- Kong Gateway vs GraphQL Apollo
- Kong Gateway vs Appwrite
- Kong Gateway vs Payload CMS
- Kong Gateway vs Portkey
- Kong Gateway vs Prisma
- Kong Gateway vs RapidAPI
- Kong Gateway vs REST Client VSCode
- Kong Gateway vs Rutter
- Kong Gateway vs DigitalOcean
- Kong Gateway vs Neon
- Kong Gateway vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Kong Gateway vs Grafana Cloud
- Kong Gateway vs Pulumi
- Kong Gateway vs Portworx
- Kong Gateway vs Serverless Framework
- Kong Gateway vs Podman
- Kong Gateway vs Caddy
- Kong Gateway vs Rancher
- Kong Gateway vs Infracost
- Kong Gateway vs Porter
- Kong Gateway vs SST
- Kong Gateway vs Tencent Cloud
- Kong Gateway vs Terragrunt
- Kong Gateway vs Thanos
- Kong Gateway vs Zeabur
- Kong Gateway vs Zipkin
- Vagrant vs Tyk
- Vagrant vs Moesif
- Vagrant vs Treblle
- Vagrant vs Convoy
- Vagrant vs Janus Gateway
- Vagrant vs Spring Cloud Gateway
- Vagrant vs Gravitee
- Vagrant vs Strapi
- Vagrant vs WSO2 API Manager
- Vagrant vs AWS API Gateway
- Vagrant vs GraphQL Apollo
- Vagrant vs Appwrite
- Vagrant vs Payload CMS
- Vagrant vs Portkey
- Vagrant vs Prisma
- Vagrant vs RapidAPI
- Vagrant vs REST Client VSCode
- Vagrant vs Rutter
- Vagrant vs DigitalOcean
- Vagrant vs Neon
- Vagrant vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Vagrant vs Grafana Cloud
- Vagrant vs Pulumi
- Vagrant vs Portworx
- Vagrant vs Serverless Framework
- Vagrant vs Podman
- Vagrant vs Caddy
- Vagrant vs Rancher
- Vagrant vs Infracost
- Vagrant vs Porter
- Vagrant vs SST
- Vagrant vs Tencent Cloud
- Vagrant vs Terragrunt
- Vagrant vs Thanos
- Vagrant vs Zeabur
- Vagrant vs Zipkin

