Construction · head to head
Kojo vs Togal.AI

Kojo
Construction
Materials procurement and inventory for speciality trade contractors
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Togal.AI
Construction
Automated drawing takeoff that measures and labels spaces without manual tracing
- From
- $299/month
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Kojo benefits depend on distributors providing electronic catalogues and pricing, and a contractor whose main supplier will not participate is left keying quotes by hand.; Togal.AI annual billing is mandatory at $299 per user per month, so an estimating team that ramps up and down for bid seasons pays a full year for seats it uses intermittently.
- They diverge on capability: Kojo covers Field material requests, Togal.AI covers Automatic space detection.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Kojo and Togal.AI actually diverge.
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Construction).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Kojo
- Field material requests
- Multi-supplier quoting
- Purchase order management
- Inventory and warehouse
- Committed cost visibility
- Enterprise resource planning integration
Only in Togal.AI
- Automatic space detection
- Drawing comparison
- Natural language search
- Automated counts
- Excel export
- Plan set management
- Team sharing
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Kojo
- An electrical or mechanical contractor where materials are close to half of job cost and buying happens dailynot Togal.AI
- A trade contractor that cannot see committed material cost against a job until the invoice arrivesnot Togal.AI
- A contractor consolidating purchasing across branches to negotiate better distributor pricingnot Togal.AI
- A subcontractor tracking warehouse stock and job transfers that currently live in a spreadsheetnot Togal.AI
Togal.AI
- A commercial general contractor bidding repetitive multifamily or hospitality floor plates where room-by-room area takeoff dominates the effortnot Kojo
- An estimating team that needs to requantify quickly when an architect issues a revised set two days before a bidnot Kojo
- A finishes subcontractor pricing flooring, paint and ceiling areas across hundreds of roomsnot Kojo
- A preconstruction group producing early order-of-magnitude budgets from schematic plans before a full estimate is justifiednot Kojo
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Kojo
- Benefits depend on distributors providing electronic catalogues and pricing, and a contractor whose main supplier will not participate is left keying quotes by hand.
- It serves speciality trade contractors; general contractors procure subcontracts rather than materials and get almost nothing from it.
- Enterprise resource planning integration quality varies by system and version, so confirm the depth for your exact configuration rather than accepting the logo on the website.
- Field adoption is the whole game, and foremen who lose signal in a plant room or basement revert to phoning the office within days unless offline capture genuinely works.
- It changes purchasing process as well as software, so contractors whose buying authority is informal have to formalise who can commit money before the system produces clean data.
Togal.AI
- Annual billing is mandatory at $299 per user per month, so an estimating team that ramps up and down for bid seasons pays a full year for seats it uses intermittently.
- Detection is tuned to architectural floor plans and space-based quantities; civil, structural detail and MEP riser takeoff still need a conventional tool, so most firms end up paying for two.
- Automatically generated quantities still require estimator review before they enter a bid, so the saving is in tracing time rather than in checking time, and firms that skip the check are exposed on a hard-money bid.
- The company spun out of a single general contractor, and drawing conventions that differ from that firm's typical project types produce weaker detection until the set is cleaned up.
- It is a takeoff tool, not an estimating system, so pricing, rate build-up and bid assembly still happen elsewhere and the Excel handoff is the seam where errors get introduced.
Pricing, plan by plan
Kojo
On request- Kojo$undefined/year
- Materials procurement workflow
- Supplier quoting and purchase orders
- Inventory tracking
Togal.AI
$299/month- Growth$299/month
- One or two licences
- Unlimited AI takeoffs
- Drawing comparison and search
- Business$undefined/year
- Three or more licences
- Quoted by the vendor
- Team administration and shared takeoffs
Which should you pick?
Choose Kojo if
- You need field material requests.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want multi-supplier quoting.
Choose Togal.AI if
- You need automatic space detection.
- You also want drawing comparison.
Questions people ask
- Is Kojo or Togal.AI better?
- Neither clearly leads. Kojo starts at On request and Togal.AI at $299/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Kojo or Togal.AI?
- Kojo starts at On request and Togal.AI at $299/month.
- Does Kojo or Togal.AI run on more platforms?
- Kojo runs on Web, iOS, Android. Togal.AI runs on Web.
- What is Kojo best used for?
- Kojo is most often used for an electrical or mechanical contractor where materials are close to half of job cost and buying happens daily, a trade contractor that cannot see committed material cost against a job until the invoice arrives, a contractor consolidating purchasing across branches to negotiate better distributor pricing, a subcontractor tracking warehouse stock and job transfers that currently live in a spreadsheet. Of those, an electrical or mechanical contractor where materials are close to half of job cost and buying happens daily and a trade contractor that cannot see committed material cost against a job until the invoice arrives are not what Togal.AI is typically brought in for.
- What can Kojo do that Togal.AI cannot?
- Kojo covers Field material requests, Multi-supplier quoting, Purchase order management, Inventory and warehouse. Togal.AI covers Automatic space detection, Drawing comparison, Natural language search, Automated counts.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Kojo: Is this for general contractors?
No. It is built for speciality trade contractors buying materials. General contractors procure subcontracts and would get little from it.
Togal.AI: What does Togal.AI cost?
$299 per user per month billed annually for one or two licences. Three or more users are quoted individually.
Kojo: What if our suppliers will not connect?
You lose most of the quoting benefit and keep only the internal workflow. Check distributor participation before purchase, because it determines the return.
Togal.AI: Can I pay monthly?
No. The published Growth plan requires annual billing.
Kojo: Does it work without signal on site?
Field requests are designed for site use, and offline behaviour should be tested with your own crews in your worst locations, because that is where adoption is won or lost.
Togal.AI: Does it replace an estimating system?
No. It produces quantities. Rates, markup and bid assembly still happen in your estimating software or a spreadsheet.
Togal.AI: Who owns the drawings and takeoffs I upload?
You do, and quantities export to Excel, but check the contract for how uploaded drawing sets are retained and whether they inform model training.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Kojo vs Foundation Software
- Kojo vs Procore
- Kojo vs Knowify
- Kojo vs Siteline
- Kojo vs Assignar
- Kojo vs Clearstory
- Kojo vs GCPay
- Kojo vs ConstructConnect
- Kojo vs Document Crunch
- Kojo vs Oracle Textura Payment Management
- Kojo vs Bridgit Bravo
- Kojo vs Trimble Pay
- Kojo vs HammerTech
- Kojo vs Handoff
- Kojo vs HCSS HeavyBid
- Kojo vs Houzz Pro
- Kojo vs iAuditor by SafetyCulture
- Kojo vs JobTread
- Kojo vs Cubit Estimating
- Kojo vs PlanSwift
- Kojo vs Bluebeam Revu
- Kojo vs RIB CostX
- Kojo vs HCSS
- Kojo vs STACK Construction Technologies
- Kojo vs On-Screen Takeoff
- Kojo vs Trunk Tools
- Kojo vs Dalux
- Kojo vs Buildots
- Kojo vs Propeller Aero
- Kojo vs Sitemark
- Kojo vs Skydio Dock for X10
- Kojo vs Tekla Structures
- Togal.AI vs Foundation Software
- Togal.AI vs Procore
- Togal.AI vs Knowify
- Togal.AI vs Siteline
- Togal.AI vs Assignar
- Togal.AI vs Clearstory
- Togal.AI vs GCPay
- Togal.AI vs ConstructConnect
- Togal.AI vs Document Crunch
- Togal.AI vs Oracle Textura Payment Management
- Togal.AI vs Bridgit Bravo
- Togal.AI vs Trimble Pay
- Togal.AI vs HammerTech
- Togal.AI vs Handoff
- Togal.AI vs HCSS HeavyBid
- Togal.AI vs Houzz Pro
- Togal.AI vs iAuditor by SafetyCulture
- Togal.AI vs JobTread
- Togal.AI vs Cubit Estimating
- Togal.AI vs PlanSwift
- Togal.AI vs Bluebeam Revu
- Togal.AI vs RIB CostX
- Togal.AI vs HCSS
- Togal.AI vs STACK Construction Technologies
- Togal.AI vs On-Screen Takeoff
- Togal.AI vs Trunk Tools
- Togal.AI vs Dalux
- Togal.AI vs Buildots
- Togal.AI vs Propeller Aero
- Togal.AI vs Sitemark
- Togal.AI vs Skydio Dock for X10
- Togal.AI vs Tekla Structures
