Construction · head to head
Kojo vs Raken

Kojo
Construction
Materials procurement and inventory for speciality trade contractors
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Kojo benefits depend on distributors providing electronic catalogues and pricing, and a contractor whose main supplier will not participate is left keying quotes by hand.; Raken no pricing tiers published on public website. Pricing requires direct contact with sales at 858-290-4477 or [email protected]
- They diverge on capability: Kojo covers Field material requests, Raken covers Daily reporting.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Kojo and Raken actually diverge.
Identical on both: free tier (No), platforms (Web, iOS, Android), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Construction).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Kojo
- Field material requests
- Multi-supplier quoting
- Purchase order management
- Inventory and warehouse
- Committed cost visibility
- Enterprise resource planning integration
Only in Raken
- Daily reporting
- Photo documentation
- Time tracking
- Production tracking
- Safety toolbox talks
- Procore
- Autodesk BIM 360
- Sage
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Kojo
- An electrical or mechanical contractor where materials are close to half of job cost and buying happens dailynot Raken
- A trade contractor that cannot see committed material cost against a job until the invoice arrivesnot Raken
- A contractor consolidating purchasing across branches to negotiate better distributor pricingnot Raken
- A subcontractor tracking warehouse stock and job transfers that currently live in a spreadsheetnot Raken
Raken
- Daily logsnot Kojo
- Field documentationnot Kojo
- Progress trackingnot Kojo
- Time managementnot Kojo
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Kojo
- Benefits depend on distributors providing electronic catalogues and pricing, and a contractor whose main supplier will not participate is left keying quotes by hand.
- It serves speciality trade contractors; general contractors procure subcontracts rather than materials and get almost nothing from it.
- Enterprise resource planning integration quality varies by system and version, so confirm the depth for your exact configuration rather than accepting the logo on the website.
- Field adoption is the whole game, and foremen who lose signal in a plant room or basement revert to phoning the office within days unless offline capture genuinely works.
- It changes purchasing process as well as software, so contractors whose buying authority is informal have to formalise who can commit money before the system produces clean data.
Raken
- No pricing tiers published on public website. Pricing requires direct contact with sales at 858-290-4477 or [email protected]
Pricing, plan by plan
Kojo
On request- Kojo$undefined/year
- Materials procurement workflow
- Supplier quoting and purchase orders
- Inventory tracking
Raken
$40/month- Lite$40/month
- Daily reports
- Photo documentation
- Time tracking
- Pro$80/month
- Everything in Lite
- Production tracking
- Toolbox talks
- EnterpriseFree
- Custom workflows
- API access
- SSO
Which should you pick?
Choose Kojo if
- You need field material requests.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want multi-supplier quoting.
Choose Raken if
- You need daily reporting.
- You work on Web, Ios, Android.
- You also want photo documentation.
Questions people ask
- Is Kojo or Raken better?
- Neither clearly leads. Kojo starts at On request and Raken at $40/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Kojo or Raken?
- Kojo starts at On request and Raken at $40/month.
- Does Kojo or Raken run on more platforms?
- Kojo runs on Web, iOS, Android. Raken runs on Web, Ios, Android.
- What is Kojo best used for?
- Kojo is most often used for an electrical or mechanical contractor where materials are close to half of job cost and buying happens daily, a trade contractor that cannot see committed material cost against a job until the invoice arrives, a contractor consolidating purchasing across branches to negotiate better distributor pricing, a subcontractor tracking warehouse stock and job transfers that currently live in a spreadsheet. Of those, an electrical or mechanical contractor where materials are close to half of job cost and buying happens daily and a trade contractor that cannot see committed material cost against a job until the invoice arrives are not what Raken is typically brought in for.
- What can Kojo do that Raken cannot?
- Kojo covers Field material requests, Multi-supplier quoting, Purchase order management, Inventory and warehouse. Raken covers Daily reporting, Photo documentation, Time tracking, Production tracking.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Kojo: Is this for general contractors?
No. It is built for speciality trade contractors buying materials. General contractors procure subcontracts and would get little from it.
Raken: Does Raken offer a free trial?
Yes, Raken offers a free trial option with no pricing details disclosed on the public website. Interested users can start a free trial or schedule a demo to see the product in action.
SourceKojo: What if our suppliers will not connect?
You lose most of the quoting benefit and keep only the internal workflow. Check distributor participation before purchase, because it determines the return.
Raken: What is Raken's pricing model?
Raken uses a quote-based pricing model. No pricing tiers or rates are published on their website. Pricing must be obtained by contacting their sales team.
SourceKojo: Does it work without signal on site?
Field requests are designed for site use, and offline behaviour should be tested with your own crews in your worst locations, because that is where adoption is won or lost.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Kojo vs Foundation Software
- Kojo vs Procore
- Kojo vs Knowify
- Kojo vs Siteline
- Kojo vs Assignar
- Kojo vs Clearstory
- Kojo vs GCPay
- Kojo vs ConstructConnect
- Kojo vs Document Crunch
- Kojo vs Oracle Textura Payment Management
- Kojo vs Bridgit Bravo
- Kojo vs Trimble Pay
- Kojo vs HammerTech
- Kojo vs Handoff
- Kojo vs HCSS HeavyBid
- Kojo vs Houzz Pro
- Kojo vs iAuditor by SafetyCulture
- Kojo vs JobTread
- Kojo vs SketchUp
- Kojo vs ArchiCAD
- Kojo vs Autodesk Revit
- Kojo vs Fieldwire
- Kojo vs Dalux
- Kojo vs Chief Architect
- Kojo vs Bluebeam Revu
- Kojo vs Contractor Foreman
- Kojo vs Autodesk Construction Cloud
- Raken vs Foundation Software
- Raken vs Procore
- Raken vs Knowify
- Raken vs Siteline
- Raken vs Assignar
- Raken vs Clearstory
- Raken vs GCPay
- Raken vs ConstructConnect
- Raken vs Document Crunch
- Raken vs Oracle Textura Payment Management
- Raken vs Bridgit Bravo
- Raken vs Trimble Pay
- Raken vs HammerTech
- Raken vs Handoff
- Raken vs HCSS HeavyBid
- Raken vs Houzz Pro
- Raken vs iAuditor by SafetyCulture
- Raken vs JobTread
- Raken vs SketchUp
- Raken vs ArchiCAD
- Raken vs Autodesk Revit
- Raken vs Fieldwire
- Raken vs Dalux
- Raken vs Chief Architect
- Raken vs Bluebeam Revu
- Raken vs Contractor Foreman
- Raken vs Autodesk Construction Cloud

