Softwr

Cybersecurity · head to head

iDenfy vs Jumio

iDenfy logo

iDenfy

Cybersecurity

Identity verification and AML screening bundled into a single per-verification price

From
On request
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite
Jumio logo

Jumio

Cybersecurity

Document-based identity verification for regulated onboarding

From
On request
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: iDenfy rates are quoted rather than published on an accessible page, so despite the marketing emphasis on transparency you still need a sales conversation to get a number.; Jumio no pricing is published at any tier, so a buyer cannot size the cost without entering a sales process, and benchmarking requires a competitive bid from a vendor that does publish.
  • They diverge on capability: iDenfy covers Human review on all cases, Jumio covers Liveness detection.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which iDenfy and Jumio actually diverge.

Attributes where iDenfy and Jumio differ
AttributeiDenfyJumio
Pricing modelPer verificationquote
PlatformsWeb, iOS, Android, APIWeb, iOS, Android

Identical on both: starting price (On request), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in iDenfy

  • Human review on all cases
  • Business verification
  • Proof of address
  • NFC chip reading

Only in Jumio

  • Liveness detection
  • Identity orchestration
  • Risk signals
  • Data residency options
  • Case review console

Both cover

  • Document verification
  • AML screening

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

iDenfy

  • A European fintech that needs KYC and AML screening and wants one price rather than four line itemsnot Jumio
  • A gambling operator in a regulated EU market needing age and identity assurance with EU data processingnot Jumio
  • A crypto platform with modest volume that cannot meet the minimum commitments larger vendors requirenot Jumio
  • A marketplace wanting NFC passport chip reading for higher assurance without an enterprise contractnot Jumio

Jumio

  • A bank that needs iBeta certified liveness evidence to satisfy an internal control requirementnot iDenfy
  • A gambling operator required to verify age and identity across multiple regulated European marketsnot iDenfy
  • An organisation with an EU data residency mandate that cannot send biometric data to US processingnot iDenfy
  • A marketplace needing one vendor contract covering document checks, screening and ongoing monitoring rather than threenot iDenfy

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

iDenfy

  • Rates are quoted rather than published on an accessible page, so despite the marketing emphasis on transparency you still need a sales conversation to get a number.
  • It is a smaller vendor than the market leaders, which makes it a harder sell through enterprise vendor-risk review even when the product performs well.
  • Human review on every case caps throughput in a way fully automated competitors are not constrained by, which shows up as latency during volume spikes.
  • Coverage and accuracy are strongest on European documents; performance on some Asian, African and Latin American document types trails specialists in those regions.
  • The bundled AML screening uses its chosen data sources, so institutions mandated to use a specific list provider such as Dow Jones cannot substitute it and end up paying twice.

Jumio

  • No pricing is published at any tier, so a buyer cannot size the cost without entering a sales process, and benchmarking requires a competitive bid from a vendor that does publish.
  • Contracts are structured on annual committed volume, meaning a business whose growth stalls pays for verifications it never consumed and there is usually no rollover.
  • AML screening is licensed separately from identity verification, so the quote that wins on document price can be materially more expensive once screening and monitoring are added.
  • Pass rates degrade for lower quality documents and older smartphones, and the resulting manual review queue is a staffing cost that does not appear in the vendor quote.
  • As an established vendor with a large enterprise base, product changes move at enterprise pace, and buyers wanting rapid iteration on new fraud vectors often find newer entrants ship faster.

Pricing, plan by plan

iDenfy

On request
  • iDenfy Verification$undefined/verification
    • Volume-tiered per-verification rates quoted on request
    • AML screening bundled rather than charged per check
    • No monthly minimum advertised

Jumio

On request
  • Jumio Platform$undefined/year
    • Priced per verification with annual volume commitment
    • Overage rates apply above committed volume
    • AML screening priced separately from document checks

Which should you pick?

Choose iDenfy if

  • You need human review on all cases.
  • You work on Web, iOS, Android, API.
  • You also want business verification.
iDenfy review

Choose Jumio if

  • You need liveness detection.
  • You work on Web, iOS, Android.
  • You also want identity orchestration.
Jumio review

Questions people ask

Is iDenfy or Jumio better?
Neither clearly leads. iDenfy starts at On request and Jumio at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, iDenfy or Jumio?
iDenfy starts at On request and Jumio at On request.
Does iDenfy or Jumio run on more platforms?
iDenfy runs on Web, iOS, Android, API. Jumio runs on Web, iOS, Android.
What is iDenfy best used for?
iDenfy is most often used for a european fintech that needs kyc and aml screening and wants one price rather than four line items, a gambling operator in a regulated eu market needing age and identity assurance with eu data processing, a crypto platform with modest volume that cannot meet the minimum commitments larger vendors require, a marketplace wanting nfc passport chip reading for higher assurance without an enterprise contract. Of those, a european fintech that needs kyc and aml screening and wants one price rather than four line items and a gambling operator in a regulated eu market needing age and identity assurance with eu data processing are not what Jumio is typically brought in for.
What can iDenfy do that Jumio cannot?
iDenfy covers Human review on all cases, Business verification, Proof of address, NFC chip reading. Jumio covers Liveness detection, Identity orchestration, Risk signals, Data residency options. Both handle Document verification, AML screening.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

iDenfy: Is AML screening included in the verification price?

That is the pitch, screening bundled rather than sold as a per-check add-on. Confirm which sanctions and PEP data sources are behind it before you rely on it.

Jumio: Does Jumio publish prices?

No. Everything is quoted, normally as a per-verification rate against an annual committed volume with overage pricing above it.

iDenfy: Is there a monthly minimum?

iDenfy markets itself as having no monthly minimum, in contrast to competitors charging $49 to $299 a month. Get that in writing in the contract.

Jumio: Is biometric data processed in the EU?

Regional processing including EU data residency is offered. Confirm the specific region and retention period in the contract rather than assuming it.

iDenfy: Where is data processed?

iDenfy is established in Lithuania and processes in the EU, which simplifies GDPR transfer assessments compared with United States-headquartered vendors.

Jumio: Is AML screening included?

Not by default. Screening and ongoing monitoring are priced separately from document verification.

Share

Related pages

More on iDenfy

More on Jumio

Keep looking

Other head to heads