Manufacturing · head to head
JobBOSS² vs Nanoprecise Sci Corp

JobBOSS²
Manufacturing
ECI shop control system formed by merging JobBOSS and E2 Shop System into one product line
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Nanoprecise Sci Corp
Manufacturing
Battery-powered six-in-one condition monitoring sensors with automated fault diagnosis
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: JobBOSS² the product is a merger of two legacy systems, so existing JobBOSS and E2 customers face a migration and retraining project whose cost is negotiated case by case and is easy to underestimate.; Nanoprecise Sci Corp the hardware and analytics are inseparable, so you cannot bring your own accelerometers or keep the platform if you change sensor vendor, and every expansion of coverage is a hardware purchase as well as a subscription increase.
- They diverge on capability: JobBOSS² covers Estimating and quoting, Nanoprecise Sci Corp covers Six-parameter sensor.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which JobBOSS² and Nanoprecise Sci Corp actually diverge.
| Attribute | JobBOSS² | Nanoprecise Sci Corp |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Windows, Web | Web, Cloud, iOS, Android |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Manufacturing).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in JobBOSS²
- Estimating and quoting
- Order and job management
- Shop floor data collection
- Scheduling
- Job costing
- Integrated accounting
Only in Nanoprecise Sci Corp
- Six-parameter sensor
- Automated fault classification
- Remaining useful life estimate
- Multi-connectivity
- Long battery life
- Energy and carbon reporting
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
JobBOSS²
- A job shop quoting from spreadsheets that wants estimating, routing and costing in one systemnot Nanoprecise Sci Corp
- An existing JobBOSS or E2 Shop System customer evaluating whether to migrate or replacenot Nanoprecise Sci Corp
- A make to order fabricator that needs accounting inside the manufacturing system rather than alongside itnot Nanoprecise Sci Corp
- A shop that wants operator time capture at work centres to make job costing reflect what actually happenednot Nanoprecise Sci Corp
Nanoprecise Sci Corp
- A plant with no vibration analyst that needs a named fault rather than a spectrum to interpretnot JobBOSS²
- Monitoring rotating equipment in areas with no power or network cabling, where a battery sensor on LTE avoids an electrical projectnot JobBOSS²
- A mining site tracking conveyor and pump condition across a large area where walkaround routes are impracticalnot JobBOSS²
- A facilities team wanting motor energy waste and condition from the same device to justify the spend on two groundsnot JobBOSS²
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
JobBOSS²
- The product is a merger of two legacy systems, so existing JobBOSS and E2 customers face a migration and retraining project whose cost is negotiated case by case and is easy to underestimate.
- ECI is a private equity owned portfolio company with many vertical products, and buyers should read renewal, uplift and support tier terms carefully because the commercial model is built around long term contracted revenue.
- Machine connectivity is limited, so shop floor data comes from operators clocking in and out rather than from controllers, and any automatic utilisation measurement needs a separate monitoring product.
- Reporting is rigid compared with a modern system and most shops end up exporting to Excel for anything beyond the supplied reports, which reintroduces the spreadsheets the system was bought to eliminate.
- The user interface carries its lineage and takes longer to learn than a current generation web application, which matters most for occasional users such as estimators and purchasing staff.
Nanoprecise Sci Corp
- The hardware and analytics are inseparable, so you cannot bring your own accelerometers or keep the platform if you change sensor vendor, and every expansion of coverage is a hardware purchase as well as a subscription increase.
- Per-asset subscription costs scale linearly with the number of monitored machines, so full coverage of a large rotating asset population becomes expensive in a way a traditional route-based programme does not.
- Nanoprecise is a small venture-funded company, so a buyer standardising a whole estate on its sensors is taking a supplier continuity risk that a Baker Hughes or SKF purchase does not carry.
- Automated fault classification is only as good as the model for your specific machine type, and unusual or slow-speed equipment is where these systems are weakest, exactly where a human analyst would still be needed.
- Nothing is published on pricing, hardware cost, gateway requirements or contract length, so total cost for a realistic deployment cannot be estimated without a sales engagement.
Pricing, plan by plan
JobBOSS²
On request- JobBOSS²$undefined/year
- Quoting through invoicing for job shops
- Shop floor data collection and scheduling
- Hosted or on premises deployment
Nanoprecise Sci Corp
On request- MachineDoctor$undefined/month
- Subscription priced per monitored asset
- MachineDoctor sensor hardware required per asset
- Gateway hardware required for WiFi and LoRa deployments
Which should you pick?
Choose JobBOSS² if
- You need estimating and quoting.
- You work on Windows, Web.
- You also want order and job management.
Choose Nanoprecise Sci Corp if
- You need six-parameter sensor.
- You work on Web, Cloud, iOS, Android.
- You also want automated fault classification.
Questions people ask
- Is JobBOSS² or Nanoprecise Sci Corp better?
- Neither clearly leads. JobBOSS² starts at On request and Nanoprecise Sci Corp at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, JobBOSS² or Nanoprecise Sci Corp?
- JobBOSS² starts at On request and Nanoprecise Sci Corp at On request.
- Does JobBOSS² or Nanoprecise Sci Corp run on more platforms?
- JobBOSS² runs on Windows, Web. Nanoprecise Sci Corp runs on Web, Cloud, iOS, Android.
- What is JobBOSS² best used for?
- JobBOSS² is most often used for a job shop quoting from spreadsheets that wants estimating, routing and costing in one system, an existing jobboss or e2 shop system customer evaluating whether to migrate or replace, a make to order fabricator that needs accounting inside the manufacturing system rather than alongside it, a shop that wants operator time capture at work centres to make job costing reflect what actually happened. Of those, a job shop quoting from spreadsheets that wants estimating, routing and costing in one system and an existing jobboss or e2 shop system customer evaluating whether to migrate or replace are not what Nanoprecise Sci Corp is typically brought in for.
- What can JobBOSS² do that Nanoprecise Sci Corp cannot?
- JobBOSS² covers Estimating and quoting, Order and job management, Shop floor data collection, Scheduling. Nanoprecise Sci Corp covers Six-parameter sensor, Automated fault classification, Remaining useful life estimate, Multi-connectivity.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
JobBOSS²: What happened to E2 Shop System?
ECI acquired it and merged it with JobBOSS into the combined JobBOSS² line. Legacy customers are directed towards migration.
Nanoprecise Sci Corp: Can I use my own vibration sensors?
No. The platform is built around the MachineDoctor sensor and third-party sensor data is not a supported first-class input.
JobBOSS²: Is it cloud based?
It is offered hosted and on premises. Hosted is not the same as a cloud native architecture, and performance expectations should be set accordingly.
Nanoprecise Sci Corp: Do I need a gateway?
For WiFi and LoRa deployments yes. LTE sensors report directly but carry a connectivity cost.
JobBOSS²: Does it include accounting?
Yes, accounting is part of the product, which is one of the main reasons small shops choose it over an ERP plus separate finance package.
Nanoprecise Sci Corp: Does it tell me what is wrong or just that something is wrong?
It classifies the fault type and estimates remaining useful life, which is the main reason plants without a vibration analyst choose it.
JobBOSS²: Can it read data from my CNC machines?
Not natively in any meaningful way. Data collection is operator driven, so shops wanting spindle level data buy a monitoring platform alongside it.
Nanoprecise Sci Corp: How is it priced?
Per monitored asset on subscription, plus sensor and gateway hardware. Nothing is published; expect a multi-year agreement.
Related pages
More on Nanoprecise Sci Corp
Other head to heads
- JobBOSS² vs AMFG
- JobBOSS² vs Paperless Parts
- JobBOSS² vs ProShop ERP
- JobBOSS² vs Xometry
- JobBOSS² vs Yokogawa CENTUM VP
- JobBOSS² vs Prodsmart
- JobBOSS² vs PTC Windchill
- JobBOSS² vs QAD Redzone
- JobBOSS² vs SolidWorks
- JobBOSS² vs LabVIEW
- JobBOSS² vs ABB 800xA
- JobBOSS² vs AVEVA System Platform
- JobBOSS² vs Authentise
- JobBOSS² vs COPA-DATA zenon
- JobBOSS² vs Duro PLM
- JobBOSS² vs Dyndrite
- JobBOSS² vs Erbessd Instruments
- JobBOSS² vs Autodesk Netfabb
- JobBOSS² vs Petasense
- JobBOSS² vs MOVUS
- JobBOSS² vs Samotics
- JobBOSS² vs Poseidon Systems
- JobBOSS² vs SKF Enlight Centre
- JobBOSS² vs Augury
- JobBOSS² vs Sensemore
- JobBOSS² vs KCF Technologies
- JobBOSS² vs Waites Sensor Technologies
- JobBOSS² vs eMaint
- JobBOSS² vs PROGNOST Systems
- JobBOSS² vs Aras Innovator
- JobBOSS² vs Arena PLM
- Nanoprecise Sci Corp vs AMFG
- Nanoprecise Sci Corp vs Paperless Parts
- Nanoprecise Sci Corp vs ProShop ERP
- Nanoprecise Sci Corp vs Xometry
- Nanoprecise Sci Corp vs Yokogawa CENTUM VP
- Nanoprecise Sci Corp vs Prodsmart
- Nanoprecise Sci Corp vs PTC Windchill
- Nanoprecise Sci Corp vs QAD Redzone
- Nanoprecise Sci Corp vs SolidWorks
- Nanoprecise Sci Corp vs LabVIEW
- Nanoprecise Sci Corp vs ABB 800xA
- Nanoprecise Sci Corp vs AVEVA System Platform
- Nanoprecise Sci Corp vs Authentise
- Nanoprecise Sci Corp vs COPA-DATA zenon
- Nanoprecise Sci Corp vs Duro PLM
- Nanoprecise Sci Corp vs Dyndrite
- Nanoprecise Sci Corp vs Erbessd Instruments
- Nanoprecise Sci Corp vs Autodesk Netfabb
- Nanoprecise Sci Corp vs Petasense
- Nanoprecise Sci Corp vs MOVUS
- Nanoprecise Sci Corp vs Samotics
- Nanoprecise Sci Corp vs Poseidon Systems
- Nanoprecise Sci Corp vs SKF Enlight Centre
- Nanoprecise Sci Corp vs Augury
- Nanoprecise Sci Corp vs Sensemore
- Nanoprecise Sci Corp vs KCF Technologies
- Nanoprecise Sci Corp vs Waites Sensor Technologies
- Nanoprecise Sci Corp vs eMaint
- Nanoprecise Sci Corp vs PROGNOST Systems
- Nanoprecise Sci Corp vs Aras Innovator
- Nanoprecise Sci Corp vs Arena PLM
