Manufacturing · head to head
Nanoprecise Sci Corp vs SolidWorks

Nanoprecise Sci Corp
Manufacturing
Battery-powered six-in-one condition monitoring sensors with automated fault diagnosis
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

SolidWorks
Manufacturing
Parametric desktop 3D CAD from Dassault Systemes, now sold as named-user subscription on the 3DEXPERIENCE platform
- From
- $2820/year
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Nanoprecise Sci Corp the hardware and analytics are inseparable, so you cannot bring your own accelerometers or keep the platform if you change sensor vendor, and every expansion of coverage is a hardware purchase as well as a subscription increase.; SolidWorks the desktop application is Windows only, so Mac and Linux users need a virtual machine, a Windows workstation or the separate cloud xDesign product at 2,580 USD a year.
- They diverge on capability: Nanoprecise Sci Corp covers Six-parameter sensor, SolidWorks covers 3D solid modeling.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Nanoprecise Sci Corp and SolidWorks actually diverge.
| Attribute | Nanoprecise Sci Corp | SolidWorks |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | $2820/year |
| Pricing model | quote | Per user per year |
| Platforms | Web, Cloud, iOS, Android | Windows |
| Founded | Unknown | 1993 |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Manufacturing).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Nanoprecise Sci Corp
- Six-parameter sensor
- Automated fault classification
- Remaining useful life estimate
- Multi-connectivity
- Long battery life
- Energy and carbon reporting
Only in SolidWorks
- 3D solid modeling
- Assembly design
- Technical drawings
- Simulation
- Rendering
- PDM systems
- ERP systems
- CAM software
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Nanoprecise Sci Corp
- A plant with no vibration analyst that needs a named fault rather than a spectrum to interpretnot SolidWorks
- Monitoring rotating equipment in areas with no power or network cabling, where a battery sensor on LTE avoids an electrical projectnot SolidWorks
- A mining site tracking conveyor and pump condition across a large area where walkaround routes are impracticalnot SolidWorks
- A facilities team wanting motor energy waste and condition from the same device to justify the spend on two groundsnot SolidWorks
SolidWorks
- Product designnot Nanoprecise Sci Corp
- Engineering analysisnot Nanoprecise Sci Corp
- Manufacturing documentationnot Nanoprecise Sci Corp
- Prototypingnot Nanoprecise Sci Corp
- Quality controlnot Nanoprecise Sci Corp
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Nanoprecise Sci Corp
- The hardware and analytics are inseparable, so you cannot bring your own accelerometers or keep the platform if you change sensor vendor, and every expansion of coverage is a hardware purchase as well as a subscription increase.
- Per-asset subscription costs scale linearly with the number of monitored machines, so full coverage of a large rotating asset population becomes expensive in a way a traditional route-based programme does not.
- Nanoprecise is a small venture-funded company, so a buyer standardising a whole estate on its sensors is taking a supplier continuity risk that a Baker Hughes or SKF purchase does not carry.
- Automated fault classification is only as good as the model for your specific machine type, and unusual or slow-speed equipment is where these systems are weakest, exactly where a human analyst would still be needed.
- Nothing is published on pricing, hardware cost, gateway requirements or contract length, so total cost for a realistic deployment cannot be estimated without a sales engagement.
SolidWorks
- The desktop application is Windows only, so Mac and Linux users need a virtual machine, a Windows workstation or the separate cloud xDesign product at 2,580 USD a year.
- Perpetual licences are no longer sold through the vendor online store and come only through resellers, and a perpetual licence still needs a paid annual service contract to get upgrades and support, so buying once and paying nothing again is not really on offer.
- Named-user subscription is per person rather than floating, so an organisation where several engineers each use CAD occasionally pays full seats for part-time use unless it negotiates otherwise.
- History-based parametric modelling breaks noisily: a change high in the feature tree can cascade rebuild errors through an assembly, which is a real productivity cost compared with direct modelling tools.
- Large assemblies stress single-threaded desktop performance, and teams routinely resort to configurations, simplified representations and expensive workstations rather than the software scaling on its own.
- The Maker licence watermarks its files so they can only be opened on other Maker licences, which means hobby work cannot be carried into a commercial seat later without exporting to neutral formats and losing the feature history.
Pricing, plan by plan
Nanoprecise Sci Corp
On request- MachineDoctor$undefined/month
- Subscription priced per monitored asset
- MachineDoctor sensor hardware required per asset
- Gateway hardware required for WiFi and LoRa deployments
SolidWorks
$2820/year- 3DEXPERIENCE SOLIDWORKS Standard$2820/year
- 235 USD per month billed annually, or 846 USD per quarter
- Per named user, excluding local tax
- Part and assembly modelling and 2D drawings
- 3DEXPERIENCE SOLIDWORKS Professional$3456/year
- 288 USD per month billed annually, or 1,038 USD per quarter
- Everything in Standard
- Intelligent CAD libraries of standard fasteners
- 3DEXPERIENCE SOLIDWORKS Premium$4716/year
- 393 USD per month billed annually, or 1,416 USD per quarter
- Everything in Professional
- Linear static analysis for parts and assemblies
- SOLIDWORKS xDesign$2580/year
- 810 USD per quarter
- Browser-based cloud modelling, no local install
- Runs on Mac, Chromebook and tablets as well as Windows
Which should you pick?
Choose Nanoprecise Sci Corp if
- You need six-parameter sensor.
- You work on Web, Cloud, iOS, Android.
- You also want automated fault classification.
Choose SolidWorks if
- You need 3d solid modeling.
- You work on Windows.
- You also want assembly design.
Questions people ask
- Is Nanoprecise Sci Corp or SolidWorks better?
- Neither clearly leads. Nanoprecise Sci Corp starts at On request and SolidWorks at $2820/year, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Nanoprecise Sci Corp or SolidWorks?
- Nanoprecise Sci Corp starts at On request and SolidWorks at $2820/year.
- Does Nanoprecise Sci Corp or SolidWorks run on more platforms?
- Nanoprecise Sci Corp runs on Web, Cloud, iOS, Android. SolidWorks runs on Windows.
- What is Nanoprecise Sci Corp best used for?
- Nanoprecise Sci Corp is most often used for a plant with no vibration analyst that needs a named fault rather than a spectrum to interpret, monitoring rotating equipment in areas with no power or network cabling, where a battery sensor on lte avoids an electrical project, a mining site tracking conveyor and pump condition across a large area where walkaround routes are impractical, a facilities team wanting motor energy waste and condition from the same device to justify the spend on two grounds. Of those, a plant with no vibration analyst that needs a named fault rather than a spectrum to interpret and monitoring rotating equipment in areas with no power or network cabling, where a battery sensor on lte avoids an electrical project are not what SolidWorks is typically brought in for.
- What can Nanoprecise Sci Corp do that SolidWorks cannot?
- Nanoprecise Sci Corp covers Six-parameter sensor, Automated fault classification, Remaining useful life estimate, Multi-connectivity. SolidWorks covers 3D solid modeling, Assembly design, Technical drawings, Simulation.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Nanoprecise Sci Corp: Can I use my own vibration sensors?
No. The platform is built around the MachineDoctor sensor and third-party sensor data is not a supported first-class input.
SolidWorks: Can you still buy a SOLIDWORKS perpetual licence?
Not from the vendor online store, which sells only term subscriptions. Perpetual licences remain available through resellers, but they still require a paid annual subscription service contract for upgrades and support.
Nanoprecise Sci Corp: Do I need a gateway?
For WiFi and LoRa deployments yes. LTE sensors report directly but carry a connectivity cost.
SolidWorks: How much does SOLIDWORKS cost per year?
The 3DS store lists Standard at 2,820 USD, Professional at 3,456 USD and Premium at 4,716 USD per named user per year, excluding local tax. Quarterly terms are 846, 1,038 and 1,416 USD.
Nanoprecise Sci Corp: Does it tell me what is wrong or just that something is wrong?
It classifies the fault type and estimates remaining useful life, which is the main reason plants without a vibration analyst choose it.
SolidWorks: What is the difference between desktop SOLIDWORKS and the 3DEXPERIENCE cloud tiers?
The desktop application still does the modelling and installs locally on Windows. The 3DEXPERIENCE platform adds cloud storage, versioning, mark-up and shared review around it. SOLIDWORKS xDesign is the separate browser-native modeller at 2,580 USD a year, and it runs on Mac and Chromebook.
Nanoprecise Sci Corp: How is it priced?
Per monitored asset on subscription, plus sensor and gateway hardware. Nothing is published; expect a multi-year agreement.
SolidWorks: Is there a cheap version for hobbyists?
Yes. 3DEXPERIENCE SOLIDWORKS for Makers is 48 USD a year or 15 USD a month, limited to personal use with project sales under 2,000 USD a year, and its files are watermarked for Maker licences only.
SolidWorks: Does SOLIDWORKS run on a Mac?
Not natively. Use the browser-based xDesign, or run the desktop application in a Windows virtual machine.
Related pages
More on Nanoprecise Sci Corp
Other head to heads
- Nanoprecise Sci Corp vs Petasense
- Nanoprecise Sci Corp vs MOVUS
- Nanoprecise Sci Corp vs Samotics
- Nanoprecise Sci Corp vs Poseidon Systems
- Nanoprecise Sci Corp vs SKF Enlight Centre
- Nanoprecise Sci Corp vs Augury
- Nanoprecise Sci Corp vs Sensemore
- Nanoprecise Sci Corp vs KCF Technologies
- Nanoprecise Sci Corp vs Erbessd Instruments
- Nanoprecise Sci Corp vs Waites Sensor Technologies
- Nanoprecise Sci Corp vs eMaint
- Nanoprecise Sci Corp vs PROGNOST Systems
- Nanoprecise Sci Corp vs Aras Innovator
- Nanoprecise Sci Corp vs Arena PLM
- Nanoprecise Sci Corp vs Authentise
- Nanoprecise Sci Corp vs Autodesk Netfabb
- Nanoprecise Sci Corp vs COPA-DATA zenon
- Nanoprecise Sci Corp vs Duro PLM
- Nanoprecise Sci Corp vs Fusion 360
- Nanoprecise Sci Corp vs Fulcrum
- Nanoprecise Sci Corp vs Tulip
- Nanoprecise Sci Corp vs MachineMetrics
- Nanoprecise Sci Corp vs Fictiv
- Nanoprecise Sci Corp vs AVEVA System Platform
- Nanoprecise Sci Corp vs Materialise Magics
- Nanoprecise Sci Corp vs Seeq
- Nanoprecise Sci Corp vs Propel
- Nanoprecise Sci Corp vs PTC Windchill
- Nanoprecise Sci Corp vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- Nanoprecise Sci Corp vs Flow Software
- Nanoprecise Sci Corp vs Formlabs PreForm
- Nanoprecise Sci Corp vs GENESIS Version 11
- Nanoprecise Sci Corp vs GrabCAD Print
- Nanoprecise Sci Corp vs Guidewheel
- Nanoprecise Sci Corp vs JobBOSS²
- SolidWorks vs Petasense
- SolidWorks vs MOVUS
- SolidWorks vs Samotics
- SolidWorks vs Poseidon Systems
- SolidWorks vs SKF Enlight Centre
- SolidWorks vs Augury
- SolidWorks vs Sensemore
- SolidWorks vs KCF Technologies
- SolidWorks vs Erbessd Instruments
- SolidWorks vs Waites Sensor Technologies
- SolidWorks vs eMaint
- SolidWorks vs PROGNOST Systems
- SolidWorks vs Aras Innovator
- SolidWorks vs Arena PLM
- SolidWorks vs Authentise
- SolidWorks vs Autodesk Netfabb
- SolidWorks vs COPA-DATA zenon
- SolidWorks vs Duro PLM
- SolidWorks vs Fusion 360
- SolidWorks vs Fulcrum
- SolidWorks vs Tulip
- SolidWorks vs MachineMetrics
- SolidWorks vs Fictiv
- SolidWorks vs AVEVA System Platform
- SolidWorks vs Materialise Magics
- SolidWorks vs Seeq
- SolidWorks vs Propel
- SolidWorks vs PTC Windchill
- SolidWorks vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- SolidWorks vs Flow Software
- SolidWorks vs Formlabs PreForm
- SolidWorks vs GENESIS Version 11
- SolidWorks vs GrabCAD Print
- SolidWorks vs Guidewheel
- SolidWorks vs JobBOSS²
