Technology · head to head
Jenkins vs Keila

Jenkins
Technology
A self-hosted automation server that can build almost anything, through a plugin ecosystem that is also its main liability.
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Keila
Email Marketing
AGPL newsletter tool from Germany, self-hostable or hosted in the EU with no free plan
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Jenkins the controller is stateful and, in the open source distribution, has no high availability: build history, configuration and plugin state live on one filesystem, so every plugin upgrade and core update is downtime for every team using it, and a controller disk failure is a restore-from-backup event.; Keila there is no free hosted plan at all, stated as deliberate policy, so unlike almost every competitor there is no way to run a small list at zero cost without self-hosting it yourself.
- They diverge on capability: Jenkins covers Plugin ecosystem, Keila covers Priced by emails sent.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Jenkins and Keila actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Jenkins
- Plugin ecosystem
- Distributed agents
- Declarative and scripted pipelines
- Shared libraries
- Configuration as Code
- Credentials management
- Self-hosted anywhere
- Multibranch and organisation folders
Only in Keila
- Priced by emails sent
- Bring your own sender
- Self-hosting
- EU hosting
- Sign-up forms
- Segmentation
- Markdown and block editor
- Multiple projects
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Jenkins
- Builds that must touch physical hardware, such as embedded devices, test rigs or signing modules attached to a specific machinenot Keila
- Air-gapped or heavily regulated environments where a hosted CI runner cannot be used at allnot Keila
- Toolchains that hosted CI does not support, including node-locked commercial licences for EDA, CAD or simulation softwarenot Keila
- Organisations with years of existing Jenkins pipelines where the migration cost currently outweighs the operational cost of stayingnot Keila
Keila
- A membership organisation holding forty thousand contacts but sending only one newsletter a month, where contact-metered pricing would cost many times morenot Jenkins
- A European publisher or public body that needs subscriber data held in the EU under a GDPR-friendly arrangementnot Jenkins
- A technical team that wants to self-host its newsletter tool and route sending through its existing AWS SES accountnot Jenkins
- An agency running several separate client lists that does not want to pay per project or per additional listnot Jenkins
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Jenkins
- The controller is stateful and, in the open source distribution, has no high availability: build history, configuration and plugin state live on one filesystem, so every plugin upgrade and core update is downtime for every team using it, and a controller disk failure is a restore-from-backup event.
- Capability comes from around 1,900 community plugins of very uneven maintenance, and the Jenkins security team regularly publishes advisories for plugins whose maintainer has gone; in some cases the advisory itself states that no fix is available and the only remedy is to stop using it.
- Plugin upgrades are coupled: one plugin can require a newer core or a newer version of another plugin, so applying a single security fix cascades into a coordinated upgrade of a dozen components on a timetable you did not choose.
- Pipelines are Groovy running under a sandbox and a continuation-passing-style transformation, so ordinary Groovy constructs sometimes fail in non-obvious ways, and the debugging skill you build transfers to no other CI system.
- It is free to licence and expensive to run: somebody must own the controller, the agents, the Java version, the credentials store and the plugin upgrade cycle, and that recurring staff cost is the usual reason organisations move to hosted CI even when Jenkins works.
- Leaving is costly by construction, because shared libraries, plugin-specific pipeline steps and accumulated freestyle jobs have no mechanical translation into GitHub Actions or GitLab CI, so the migration is a rewrite whose price grows every year you defer it.
Keila
- There is no free hosted plan at all, stated as deliberate policy, so unlike almost every competitor there is no way to run a small list at zero cost without self-hosting it yourself.
- Marketing automation is minimal, with none of the behavioural triggers, journey builders or e-commerce revenue attribution that Klaviyo, Brevo and Mailchimp treat as table stakes.
- The self-hosted route puts deliverability entirely on you: reputation, SPF, DKIM, DMARC, warm-up and bounce handling are your problem, and a badly configured instance will land in spam folders.
- It is a small project from a small company, so the integration ecosystem is thin and there is no partner network, template marketplace or large body of community expertise to draw on.
- Email volume tiers step in fixed blocks, so an organisation whose sending is uneven across the year either overbuys at the annual peak or has to change plan repeatedly.
Pricing, plan by plan
Jenkins
Free- Open SourceFree
- Unlimited builds
- 1000+ plugins
- Self-hosted
- CloudBees CI$undefined/month
- Enterprise features
- High availability
- Role-based access
Keila
Free- Self-hostedFree
- AGPL-3.0-or-later licence with no fee
- Official Docker image and sample compose file
- You supply hosting and a sending backend
- Keila XS$8/month
- Two thousand emails per month
- Unlimited contacts and projects
- Send with Keila or bring your own email server
- Keila M$32/month
- Fifteen thousand emails per month
- Unlimited contacts and projects
- Sign-up forms and segmentation
- Keila XXL$256/month
- Two hundred and fifty thousand emails per month
- Unlimited contacts and projects
- Intermediate tiers at 16, 64 and 128 EUR for 5,000, 50,000 and 100,000 emails
Which should you pick?
Choose Jenkins if
- You need plugin ecosystem.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Windows, Macos, Docker.
- You also want distributed agents.
Choose Keila if
- You need priced by emails sent.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Linux, Self-hosted.
- You also want bring your own sender.
Questions people ask
- Is Jenkins or Keila better?
- Neither clearly leads. Jenkins starts at Free and Keila at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Jenkins or Keila?
- Jenkins starts at Free and Keila at Free.
- Does Jenkins or Keila run on more platforms?
- Jenkins runs on Linux, Windows, Macos, Docker. Keila runs on Web, Linux, Self-hosted.
- Can I use Jenkins for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Jenkins best used for?
- Jenkins is most often used for builds that must touch physical hardware, such as embedded devices, test rigs or signing modules attached to a specific machine, air-gapped or heavily regulated environments where a hosted ci runner cannot be used at all, toolchains that hosted ci does not support, including node-locked commercial licences for eda, cad or simulation software, organisations with years of existing jenkins pipelines where the migration cost currently outweighs the operational cost of staying. Of those, builds that must touch physical hardware, such as embedded devices, test rigs or signing modules attached to a specific machine and air-gapped or heavily regulated environments where a hosted ci runner cannot be used at all are not what Keila is typically brought in for.
- What can Jenkins do that Keila cannot?
- Jenkins covers Plugin ecosystem, Distributed agents, Declarative and scripted pipelines, Shared libraries. Keila covers Priced by emails sent, Bring your own sender, Self-hosting, EU hosting.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Jenkins: Why choose Jenkins over GitHub Actions or GitLab CI?
When the build needs something hosted runners cannot give you: physical hardware, an air-gapped network, a node-locked commercial tool licence, or an unusual platform. If none of those apply, hosted CI is usually less work to own.
Keila: Is Keila free?
The software is, under AGPL-3.0-or-later, if you self-host. The hosted service has no free plan by deliberate policy and starts at 8 EUR a month.
Jenkins: Can Jenkins run in high availability?
Not in the open source distribution, which runs a single active controller. High availability and active-active controllers are features of CloudBees' commercial products. Open source deployments mitigate it with fast restores and, sometimes, multiple independent controllers.
Keila: How is the hosted service priced?
By emails sent, from 8 EUR for two thousand up to 256 EUR for two hundred and fifty thousand a month. Contacts and projects are unlimited on every tier.
Jenkins: How risky are the plugins?
This is the main operational risk. Many plugins have a single volunteer maintainer, and Jenkins publishes security advisories for unmaintained plugins where no fix exists. Auditing which plugins you depend on and who maintains them should be a periodic task, not a one-off.
Keila: Can I use my own email provider?
Yes. AWS SES, Sendgrid, Mailgun, Postmark, generic SMTP or a personal inbox are all supported as sending backends.
Jenkins: Do I need to know Groovy?
For declarative pipelines you can go a long way without it. Anything involving shared libraries, conditional logic or custom steps is Groovy, and it runs in a sandboxed, transformed environment where standard Groovy idioms sometimes behave unexpectedly.
Keila: Are there discounts?
Pentacent offers reduced rates to nonprofits and open source projects on request.
Jenkins: What does it cost?
The software is free under the MIT licence. The cost is infrastructure and staff time to run controllers, agents and upgrades, plus a CloudBees subscription if you want high availability, support or centralised management of many controllers.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Jenkins vs Linear
- Jenkins vs Asana
- Jenkins vs ClickUp
- Jenkins vs Figma
- Jenkins vs Kubernetes
- Jenkins vs Terraform
- Jenkins vs GitLab
- Jenkins vs GitHub
- Jenkins vs Mozilla Firefox
- Jenkins vs Sentry
- Jenkins vs Height
- Jenkins vs Attio
- Jenkins vs CloudAMQP
- Jenkins vs Dropbox
- Jenkins vs Eclipse
- Jenkins vs Miro
- Jenkins vs Personetics
- Jenkins vs Plane
- Jenkins vs MailerLite
- Jenkins vs Brevo
- Jenkins vs EmailOctopus
- Jenkins vs Listmonk
- Jenkins vs Sendy
- Jenkins vs Zoho Campaigns
- Jenkins vs Campaign Monitor
- Jenkins vs Amazon SES
- Jenkins vs Dotdigital
- Jenkins vs Moosend
- Jenkins vs Ortto
- Jenkins vs ActiveCampaign
- Jenkins vs SAP Emarsys
- Jenkins vs GetResponse
- Jenkins vs Loops
- Jenkins vs Mailjet
- Keila vs Linear
- Keila vs Asana
- Keila vs ClickUp
- Keila vs Figma
- Keila vs Kubernetes
- Keila vs Terraform
- Keila vs GitLab
- Keila vs GitHub
- Keila vs Mozilla Firefox
- Keila vs Sentry
- Keila vs Height
- Keila vs Attio
- Keila vs CloudAMQP
- Keila vs Dropbox
- Keila vs Eclipse
- Keila vs Miro
- Keila vs Personetics
- Keila vs Plane
- Keila vs MailerLite
- Keila vs Brevo
- Keila vs EmailOctopus
- Keila vs Listmonk
- Keila vs Sendy
- Keila vs Zoho Campaigns
- Keila vs Campaign Monitor
- Keila vs Amazon SES
- Keila vs Dotdigital
- Keila vs Moosend
- Keila vs Ortto
- Keila vs ActiveCampaign
- Keila vs SAP Emarsys
- Keila vs GetResponse
- Keila vs Loops
- Keila vs Mailjet
