Cybersecurity · head to head
Jamf Pro vs Ping Identity

Jamf Pro
Cybersecurity
Apple-only device management for Mac, iPhone, iPad and Apple TV, licensed per device by a public US vendor.
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Ping Identity
Cybersecurity
Enterprise identity for workforce and customers, with a 5,000 user floor
- From
- $3/month
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Jamf Pro it manages Apple hardware only, so any organisation with Windows or Android devices runs a second management platform and produces two sets of compliance evidence, and the two inventories disagree with each other more often than either vendor's documentation suggests.; Ping Identity workforce pricing carries a 5,000 user annual minimum, so an organisation with 800 staff pays for 5,000 and the effective per user cost is over six times the list rate.
- They diverge on capability: Jamf Pro covers Automated Device Enrolment, Ping Identity covers Single sign-on.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Jamf Pro and Ping Identity actually diverge.
| Attribute | Jamf Pro | Ping Identity |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | $3/month |
| Pricing model | quote | Per user per month |
| Platforms | Web | Web, Linux, Windows |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Jamf Pro
- Automated Device Enrolment
- Configuration profiles
- Policies and scripts
- Smart groups
- Self Service
- Patch management
- Extension attributes
- Same-day OS support
Only in Ping Identity
- Single sign-on
- Adaptive MFA
- Identity orchestration
- API access management
- Directory services
- Flexible deployment
- ForgeRock capabilities
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Jamf Pro
- An Apple-heavy workforce where devices ship directly to users and must configure themselves on first boot with no IT touchnot Ping Identity
- Education deployments managing shared iPads across classes with per-user app assignmentnot Ping Identity
- Developer organisations where engineers have administrator rights on their own Macs and management has to be achieved by policy and script rather than lockdownnot Ping Identity
- Organisations needing compliance evidence for Apple devices that a general-purpose endpoint manager cannot produce at the required depthnot Ping Identity
Ping Identity
- A bank that must keep identity data on premises in one country while running SaaS identity elsewherenot Jamf Pro
- An airline or telco with tens of millions of customer identities needing a directory that holds that scalenot Jamf Pro
- An enterprise assembling authentication journeys that call several external verification and risk vendorsnot Jamf Pro
- An existing ForgeRock customer deciding what its upgrade path looks like under Ping ownershipnot Jamf Pro
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Jamf Pro
- It manages Apple hardware only, so any organisation with Windows or Android devices runs a second management platform and produces two sets of compliance evidence, and the two inventories disagree with each other more often than either vendor's documentation suggests.
- Licensing is per device per year with different rates for computers and mobile devices, so spare and shared hardware sitting in a cupboard continues to consume licences until somebody actively removes it from inventory, which is nobody's job by default.
- Apple's frameworks set the ceiling: if Apple does not expose a setting through MDM or declarative device management, Jamf cannot manage it either, so requests that are a single Group Policy object on Windows are answered with a scripted workaround or with nothing.
- Zero-touch deployment depends on devices being registered in Apple Business Manager, which generally means buying through Apple or an authorised reseller, so machines bought retail or inherited through an acquisition cannot be supervised without wiping and re-enrolling them.
- Getting value from it requires an Apple platform specialist who can write shell scripts, read configuration profiles and design smart group logic, and a generalist team without that skill uses a fraction of the product while paying the full per-device rate.
Ping Identity
- Workforce pricing carries a 5,000 user annual minimum, so an organisation with 800 staff pays for 5,000 and the effective per user cost is over six times the list rate.
- Adaptive multi-factor authentication is in the Plus tier only, doubling the per user price for a capability many buyers assume is standard in a modern identity platform.
- ForgeRock no longer exists as an independent product, so customers who chose it specifically to avoid Ping now face a roadmap set by the vendor they did not pick.
- Thoma Bravo ownership across both merged companies means the commercial priority is margin, and buyers report firmer renewal negotiations than they saw before 2022.
- The portfolio has overlapping components from three product lineages, so scoping a deployment requires vendor architects and the licensing conversation is more complicated than the price list implies.
Pricing, plan by plan
Jamf Pro
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Jamf Pro review.
Ping Identity
$3/month- PingOne for Workforce Essential$3/month
- Minimum 5,000 users billed annually
- Single sign-on and directory services
- OAuth 2.0, OpenID Connect, SAML and SCIM
- PingOne for Workforce Plus$6/month
- Minimum 5,000 users billed annually
- Everything in Essential
- Adaptive multi-factor authentication
- PingOne for Customers Essential$35000/year
- Flat annual fee
- No-code identity orchestration
- Unified customer profiles
- PingOne for Customers Plus$50000/year
- Flat annual fee
- Everything in Essential
- Adaptive MFA and device management
Which should you pick?
Choose Jamf Pro if
- You need automated device enrolment.
- You also want configuration profiles.
Choose Ping Identity if
- You need single sign-on.
- You work on Web, Linux, Windows.
- You also want adaptive mfa.
Questions people ask
- Is Jamf Pro or Ping Identity better?
- Neither clearly leads. Jamf Pro starts at On request and Ping Identity at $3/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Jamf Pro or Ping Identity?
- Jamf Pro starts at On request and Ping Identity at $3/month.
- Does Jamf Pro or Ping Identity run on more platforms?
- Jamf Pro runs on Web. Ping Identity runs on Web, Linux, Windows.
- What is Jamf Pro best used for?
- Jamf Pro is most often used for an apple-heavy workforce where devices ship directly to users and must configure themselves on first boot with no it touch, education deployments managing shared ipads across classes with per-user app assignment, developer organisations where engineers have administrator rights on their own macs and management has to be achieved by policy and script rather than lockdown, organisations needing compliance evidence for apple devices that a general-purpose endpoint manager cannot produce at the required depth. Of those, an apple-heavy workforce where devices ship directly to users and must configure themselves on first boot with no it touch and education deployments managing shared ipads across classes with per-user app assignment are not what Ping Identity is typically brought in for.
- What can Jamf Pro do that Ping Identity cannot?
- Jamf Pro covers Automated Device Enrolment, Configuration profiles, Policies and scripts, Smart groups. Ping Identity covers Single sign-on, Adaptive MFA, Identity orchestration, API access management.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Jamf Pro: Does Jamf Pro include endpoint security?
No. Threat prevention, endpoint telemetry and compliance monitoring are Jamf Protect, a separate product and a separate licence. Jamf Connect for identity and password sync is also separate.
Ping Identity: Can I still buy ForgeRock?
Not as a separate product. Ping acquired ForgeRock in 2023 and the capabilities are sold within the Ping portfolio. Existing customers should ask about the specific migration path for their components.
Jamf Pro: Can it manage Windows or Android?
No. Jamf manages Apple platforms only. A mixed estate needs a second management platform, and that is a deliberate product decision rather than a gap they intend to close.
Ping Identity: What is the real minimum spend?
PingOne for Workforce Essential is 3 USD per user per month with a 5,000 user annual minimum, so roughly 180,000 USD a year before anything else.
Jamf Pro: Do I need Apple Business Manager?
For zero-touch enrolment and volume app licensing, yes. You can enrol devices manually through a user-initiated flow without it, but you lose supervision, automatic enrolment and the ability to prevent a user removing management.
Ping Identity: Is MFA included?
Basic authentication policies are in Essential. Adaptive MFA and passwordless require the Plus tier at 6 USD per user per month.
Jamf Pro: Can I host it myself?
Yes, Jamf Pro can be self-hosted, though Jamf Cloud is the default and receives new capabilities first. Self-hosting means you own the upgrade cadence, which matters because Apple's September releases set the timetable.
Jamf Pro: How does it compare to Microsoft Intune?
Intune manages Apple devices adequately and is often already paid for in an existing Microsoft agreement, which is the argument against Jamf. Jamf is deeper, supports new Apple releases faster, and has the local agent for scripting. Organisations with a few hundred Macs and a strong Apple culture generally choose Jamf; those with a handful of Macs in a Windows estate generally do not.
Related pages
More on Ping Identity
Other head to heads
- Jamf Pro vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Jamf Pro vs 1Password
- Jamf Pro vs Norton 360
- Jamf Pro vs LastPass
- Jamf Pro vs Milestone XProtect
- Jamf Pro vs WireGuard
- Jamf Pro vs VIVOTEK VAST Security Station
- Jamf Pro vs Fenergo
- Jamf Pro vs Saviynt
- Jamf Pro vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Jamf Pro vs IBM QRadar
- Jamf Pro vs Authelia
- Jamf Pro vs Authy
- Jamf Pro vs Baffle
- Jamf Pro vs Beyond Identity
- Jamf Pro vs BeyondTrust
- Jamf Pro vs Bitdefender VPN
- Jamf Pro vs Frontegg
- Jamf Pro vs Speakeasy
- Jamf Pro vs Akeyless
- Jamf Pro vs authentik
- Jamf Pro vs Logto
- Jamf Pro vs Transmit Security
- Jamf Pro vs Delinea
- Jamf Pro vs Genetec Security Center
- Jamf Pro vs VMware Carbon Black
- Jamf Pro vs Rhombus Systems
- Jamf Pro vs Yoti
- Jamf Pro vs Avast One
- Jamf Pro vs Chainguard
- Jamf Pro vs Cosign
- Jamf Pro vs CyberGhost VPN
- Ping Identity vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Ping Identity vs 1Password
- Ping Identity vs Norton 360
- Ping Identity vs LastPass
- Ping Identity vs Milestone XProtect
- Ping Identity vs WireGuard
- Ping Identity vs VIVOTEK VAST Security Station
- Ping Identity vs Fenergo
- Ping Identity vs Saviynt
- Ping Identity vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Ping Identity vs IBM QRadar
- Ping Identity vs Authelia
- Ping Identity vs Authy
- Ping Identity vs Baffle
- Ping Identity vs Beyond Identity
- Ping Identity vs BeyondTrust
- Ping Identity vs Bitdefender VPN
- Ping Identity vs Frontegg
- Ping Identity vs Speakeasy
- Ping Identity vs Akeyless
- Ping Identity vs authentik
- Ping Identity vs Logto
- Ping Identity vs Transmit Security
- Ping Identity vs Delinea
- Ping Identity vs Genetec Security Center
- Ping Identity vs VMware Carbon Black
- Ping Identity vs Rhombus Systems
- Ping Identity vs Yoti
- Ping Identity vs Avast One
- Ping Identity vs Chainguard
- Ping Identity vs Cosign
- Ping Identity vs CyberGhost VPN
