Cybersecurity · head to head
Ping Identity vs Saviynt

Ping Identity
Cybersecurity
Enterprise identity for workforce and customers, with a 5,000 user floor
- From
- $3/month
- Rated
- -

Saviynt
Cybersecurity
Cloud identity governance with privileged access in the same platform
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Ping Identity workforce pricing carries a 5,000 user annual minimum, so an organisation with 800 staff pays for 5,000 and the effective per user cost is over six times the list rate.; Saviynt implementation typically runs a year or more with a partner, and the cost of that work regularly exceeds the first year subscription, which is rarely in the initial business case.
- They diverge on capability: Ping Identity covers Single sign-on, Saviynt covers Identity governance.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Ping Identity and Saviynt actually diverge.
| Attribute | Ping Identity | Saviynt |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $3/month | On request |
| Pricing model | Per user per month | quote |
| Platforms | Web, Linux, Windows | Web |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Ping Identity
- Single sign-on
- Adaptive MFA
- Identity orchestration
- API access management
- Directory services
- Flexible deployment
- ForgeRock capabilities
Only in Saviynt
- Identity governance
- Access certification
- Segregation of duties
- Privileged access
- Cloud entitlements
- Third party access
- Access request
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Ping Identity
- A bank that must keep identity data on premises in one country while running SaaS identity elsewherenot Saviynt
- An airline or telco with tens of millions of customer identities needing a directory that holds that scalenot Saviynt
- An enterprise assembling authentication journeys that call several external verification and risk vendorsnot Saviynt
- An existing ForgeRock customer deciding what its upgrade path looks like under Ping ownershipnot Saviynt
Saviynt
- An enterprise with an audit finding that privileged administrative accounts are excluded from access reviewsnot Ping Identity
- A healthcare system governing clinician access to Epic alongside corporate applications in one certification campaignnot Ping Identity
- A company that has to prove segregation of duties in SAP to an external auditor every yearnot Ping Identity
- A federal contractor needing an identity governance service with FedRAMP authorisationnot Ping Identity
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Ping Identity
- Workforce pricing carries a 5,000 user annual minimum, so an organisation with 800 staff pays for 5,000 and the effective per user cost is over six times the list rate.
- Adaptive multi-factor authentication is in the Plus tier only, doubling the per user price for a capability many buyers assume is standard in a modern identity platform.
- ForgeRock no longer exists as an independent product, so customers who chose it specifically to avoid Ping now face a roadmap set by the vendor they did not pick.
- Thoma Bravo ownership across both merged companies means the commercial priority is margin, and buyers report firmer renewal negotiations than they saw before 2022.
- The portfolio has overlapping components from three product lineages, so scoping a deployment requires vendor architects and the licensing conversation is more complicated than the price list implies.
Saviynt
- Implementation typically runs a year or more with a partner, and the cost of that work regularly exceeds the first year subscription, which is rarely in the initial business case.
- Governance quality is limited by HR and application data quality, so organisations with inconsistent joiner records spend the early phases correcting source data rather than certifying access.
- Pricing is per governed identity, so counting contractors, service accounts and non-employee identities materially changes the bill and the definition is worth negotiating explicitly.
- The privileged access module is younger than the governance core and is not a full substitute for a dedicated PAM product in estates with heavy session recording or credential rotation requirements.
- Connectors to less common applications require custom development, and each one adds a maintenance burden that reappears every time the target application changes its API.
Pricing, plan by plan
Ping Identity
$3/month- PingOne for Workforce Essential$3/month
- Minimum 5,000 users billed annually
- Single sign-on and directory services
- OAuth 2.0, OpenID Connect, SAML and SCIM
- PingOne for Workforce Plus$6/month
- Minimum 5,000 users billed annually
- Everything in Essential
- Adaptive multi-factor authentication
- PingOne for Customers Essential$35000/year
- Flat annual fee
- No-code identity orchestration
- Unified customer profiles
- PingOne for Customers Plus$50000/year
- Flat annual fee
- Everything in Essential
- Adaptive MFA and device management
Saviynt
On request- Saviynt Identity Cloud$undefined/year
- Priced per governed identity per year
- Modules for governance, privileged access and cloud entitlements
- SaaS delivery with FedRAMP authorised offering available
Which should you pick?
Choose Ping Identity if
- You need single sign-on.
- You work on Web, Linux, Windows.
- You also want adaptive mfa.
Questions people ask
- Is Ping Identity or Saviynt better?
- Neither clearly leads. Ping Identity starts at $3/month and Saviynt at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Ping Identity or Saviynt?
- Ping Identity starts at $3/month and Saviynt at On request.
- Does Ping Identity or Saviynt run on more platforms?
- Ping Identity runs on Web, Linux, Windows. Saviynt runs on Web.
- What is Ping Identity best used for?
- Ping Identity is most often used for a bank that must keep identity data on premises in one country while running saas identity elsewhere, an airline or telco with tens of millions of customer identities needing a directory that holds that scale, an enterprise assembling authentication journeys that call several external verification and risk vendors, an existing forgerock customer deciding what its upgrade path looks like under ping ownership. Of those, a bank that must keep identity data on premises in one country while running saas identity elsewhere and an airline or telco with tens of millions of customer identities needing a directory that holds that scale are not what Saviynt is typically brought in for.
- What can Ping Identity do that Saviynt cannot?
- Ping Identity covers Single sign-on, Adaptive MFA, Identity orchestration, API access management. Saviynt covers Identity governance, Access certification, Segregation of duties, Privileged access.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Ping Identity: Can I still buy ForgeRock?
Not as a separate product. Ping acquired ForgeRock in 2023 and the capabilities are sold within the Ping portfolio. Existing customers should ask about the specific migration path for their components.
Saviynt: Does Saviynt replace a PAM vendor?
It can for time-bound privileged access, but organisations with heavy session recording, credential rotation or legacy server access requirements often keep a dedicated PAM product alongside it.
Ping Identity: What is the real minimum spend?
PingOne for Workforce Essential is 3 USD per user per month with a 5,000 user annual minimum, so roughly 180,000 USD a year before anything else.
Saviynt: Is there a FedRAMP authorised version?
Yes, Saviynt offers a FedRAMP authorised government cloud offering, which matters where that is an eligibility requirement rather than a preference.
Ping Identity: Is MFA included?
Basic authentication policies are in Essential. Adaptive MFA and passwordless require the Plus tier at 6 USD per user per month.
Saviynt: How is it priced?
Per governed identity per year, quoted. Define carefully whether service accounts and contractors count toward the identity total.
Related pages
More on Ping Identity
Other head to heads
- Ping Identity vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Ping Identity vs Frontegg
- Ping Identity vs Speakeasy
- Ping Identity vs Akeyless
- Ping Identity vs authentik
- Ping Identity vs Logto
- Ping Identity vs Authelia
- Ping Identity vs Transmit Security
- Ping Identity vs Delinea
- Ping Identity vs Genetec Security Center
- Ping Identity vs VMware Carbon Black
- Ping Identity vs Rhombus Systems
- Ping Identity vs Yoti
- Ping Identity vs Avast One
- Ping Identity vs Chainguard
- Ping Identity vs Cosign
- Ping Identity vs CyberGhost VPN
- Ping Identity vs One Identity
- Ping Identity vs Omada Identity
- Ping Identity vs Infisical
- Ping Identity vs Netwrix
- Ping Identity vs BeyondTrust
- Ping Identity vs Doppler
- Ping Identity vs HashiCorp Boundary
- Ping Identity vs Fenergo
- Ping Identity vs Tenable
- Ping Identity vs Hanwha Vision
- Ping Identity vs Idira
- Ping Identity vs IVPN
- Ping Identity vs Malwarebytes
- Ping Identity vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
- Saviynt vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Saviynt vs Frontegg
- Saviynt vs Speakeasy
- Saviynt vs Akeyless
- Saviynt vs authentik
- Saviynt vs Logto
- Saviynt vs Authelia
- Saviynt vs Transmit Security
- Saviynt vs Delinea
- Saviynt vs Genetec Security Center
- Saviynt vs VMware Carbon Black
- Saviynt vs Rhombus Systems
- Saviynt vs Yoti
- Saviynt vs Avast One
- Saviynt vs Chainguard
- Saviynt vs Cosign
- Saviynt vs CyberGhost VPN
- Saviynt vs One Identity
- Saviynt vs Omada Identity
- Saviynt vs Infisical
- Saviynt vs Netwrix
- Saviynt vs BeyondTrust
- Saviynt vs Doppler
- Saviynt vs HashiCorp Boundary
- Saviynt vs Fenergo
- Saviynt vs Tenable
- Saviynt vs Hanwha Vision
- Saviynt vs Idira
- Saviynt vs IVPN
- Saviynt vs Malwarebytes
- Saviynt vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
