Cybersecurity · head to head
Bitdefender VPN vs Ping Identity

Bitdefender VPN
Cybersecurity
Consumer VPN sold by Bitdefender that runs on network infrastructure licensed from a third party rather than its own.
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Ping Identity
Cybersecurity
Enterprise identity for workforce and customers, with a 5,000 user floor
- From
- $3/month
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Bitdefender VPN the network is not Bitdefender's: the servers and the Catapult Hydra protocol are licensed from Aura, formerly Pango and AnchorFree, so the company physically handling your traffic and subject to legal process is a United States based third party, not the Romanian vendor whose brand is on the client.; Ping Identity workforce pricing carries a 5,000 user annual minimum, so an organisation with 800 staff pays for 5,000 and the effective per user cost is over six times the list rate.
- They diverge on capability: Bitdefender VPN covers Suite integration, Ping Identity covers Single sign-on.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Bitdefender VPN and Ping Identity actually diverge.
| Attribute | Bitdefender VPN | Ping Identity |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | $3/month |
| Pricing model | subscription | Per user per month |
| Platforms | Web | Web, Linux, Windows |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Bitdefender VPN
- Suite integration
- Catapult Hydra transport
- WireGuard support
- Kill switch
- Auto-connect rules
- Split tunnelling
- Ad and tracker blocking
- Free tier included
Only in Ping Identity
- Single sign-on
- Adaptive MFA
- Identity orchestration
- API access management
- Directory services
- Flexible deployment
- ForgeRock capabilities
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Bitdefender VPN
- An existing Bitdefender customer who wants basic tunnel protection on public Wi-Fi without evaluating and buying a second productnot Ping Identity
- Households wanting one security subscription covering malware protection and casual VPN use across a few devicesnot Ping Identity
- Hiding browsing activity from an internet service provider or a shared network operator rather than defeating a determined adversarynot Ping Identity
- Occasional access to region-locked content where a dedicated streaming-focused VPN would be more product than the need justifiesnot Ping Identity
Ping Identity
- A bank that must keep identity data on premises in one country while running SaaS identity elsewherenot Bitdefender VPN
- An airline or telco with tens of millions of customer identities needing a directory that holds that scalenot Bitdefender VPN
- An enterprise assembling authentication journeys that call several external verification and risk vendorsnot Bitdefender VPN
- An existing ForgeRock customer deciding what its upgrade path looks like under Ping ownershipnot Bitdefender VPN
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Bitdefender VPN
- The network is not Bitdefender's: the servers and the Catapult Hydra protocol are licensed from Aura, formerly Pango and AnchorFree, so the company physically handling your traffic and subject to legal process is a United States based third party, not the Romanian vendor whose brand is on the client.
- Catapult Hydra is proprietary and closed source, so unlike OpenVPN or WireGuard there is no public implementation for researchers to audit, and a buyer choosing on cryptographic grounds has nothing to inspect.
- There is no published independent no-logs audit of this service comparable to the Deloitte, PwC and KPMG engagements the standalone VPN vendors commission, so the no-logging position rests on the privacy policies of two separate companies rather than on any external assurance.
- The free tier bundled with the antivirus suites is capped at a small daily allowance and selects the server for you, so it is a demonstration rather than a usable VPN, and customers who assumed their suite included a VPN find they need a further paid upgrade.
- Feature depth is well below the dedicated market: no port forwarding, no dedicated IP, no multi-hop, no city-level server selection and no Linux or router client, so routers, NAS devices, consoles and anything needing an inbound connection cannot be covered at all.
Ping Identity
- Workforce pricing carries a 5,000 user annual minimum, so an organisation with 800 staff pays for 5,000 and the effective per user cost is over six times the list rate.
- Adaptive multi-factor authentication is in the Plus tier only, doubling the per user price for a capability many buyers assume is standard in a modern identity platform.
- ForgeRock no longer exists as an independent product, so customers who chose it specifically to avoid Ping now face a roadmap set by the vendor they did not pick.
- Thoma Bravo ownership across both merged companies means the commercial priority is margin, and buyers report firmer renewal negotiations than they saw before 2022.
- The portfolio has overlapping components from three product lineages, so scoping a deployment requires vendor architects and the licensing conversation is more complicated than the price list implies.
Pricing, plan by plan
Bitdefender VPN
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Bitdefender VPN review.
Ping Identity
$3/month- PingOne for Workforce Essential$3/month
- Minimum 5,000 users billed annually
- Single sign-on and directory services
- OAuth 2.0, OpenID Connect, SAML and SCIM
- PingOne for Workforce Plus$6/month
- Minimum 5,000 users billed annually
- Everything in Essential
- Adaptive multi-factor authentication
- PingOne for Customers Essential$35000/year
- Flat annual fee
- No-code identity orchestration
- Unified customer profiles
- PingOne for Customers Plus$50000/year
- Flat annual fee
- Everything in Essential
- Adaptive MFA and device management
Which should you pick?
Choose Bitdefender VPN if
- You need suite integration.
- You also want catapult hydra transport.
Choose Ping Identity if
- You need single sign-on.
- You work on Web, Linux, Windows.
- You also want adaptive mfa.
Questions people ask
- Is Bitdefender VPN or Ping Identity better?
- Neither clearly leads. Bitdefender VPN starts at On request and Ping Identity at $3/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Bitdefender VPN or Ping Identity?
- Bitdefender VPN starts at On request and Ping Identity at $3/month.
- Does Bitdefender VPN or Ping Identity run on more platforms?
- Bitdefender VPN runs on Web. Ping Identity runs on Web, Linux, Windows.
- What is Bitdefender VPN best used for?
- Bitdefender VPN is most often used for an existing bitdefender customer who wants basic tunnel protection on public wi-fi without evaluating and buying a second product, households wanting one security subscription covering malware protection and casual vpn use across a few devices, hiding browsing activity from an internet service provider or a shared network operator rather than defeating a determined adversary, occasional access to region-locked content where a dedicated streaming-focused vpn would be more product than the need justifies. Of those, an existing bitdefender customer who wants basic tunnel protection on public wi-fi without evaluating and buying a second product and households wanting one security subscription covering malware protection and casual vpn use across a few devices are not what Ping Identity is typically brought in for.
- What can Bitdefender VPN do that Ping Identity cannot?
- Bitdefender VPN covers Suite integration, Catapult Hydra transport, WireGuard support, Kill switch. Ping Identity covers Single sign-on, Adaptive MFA, Identity orchestration, API access management.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Bitdefender VPN: Who actually operates the servers?
The underlying VPN network and the Catapult Hydra protocol are licensed from Aura, previously known as Pango and AnchorFree, the operator of Hotspot Shield. Bitdefender identifies the arrangement in its VPN terms. Your traffic therefore passes through a United States based provider's infrastructure.
Ping Identity: Can I still buy ForgeRock?
Not as a separate product. Ping acquired ForgeRock in 2023 and the capabilities are sold within the Ping portfolio. Existing customers should ask about the specific migration path for their components.
Bitdefender VPN: Is the free version enough?
Only as a taster. It is capped at a small daily traffic allowance and chooses the server itself, which rules out streaming and any sustained use. It exists to demonstrate the feature inside the antivirus suite.
Ping Identity: What is the real minimum spend?
PingOne for Workforce Essential is 3 USD per user per month with a 5,000 user annual minimum, so roughly 180,000 USD a year before anything else.
Bitdefender VPN: Has the no-logs claim been independently audited?
There is no published independent no-logs audit of this service equivalent to those commissioned by the dedicated VPN providers. If an audited no-logging claim is what you are buying, this is not the product for it.
Ping Identity: Is MFA included?
Basic authentication policies are in Essential. Adaptive MFA and passwordless require the Plus tier at 6 USD per user per month.
Bitdefender VPN: Does it work with streaming services?
Sometimes, but it is not built around that use case, there is no per-service server labelling, and there is no commitment to restoring access when a platform blocks a range. A streaming-focused provider is a better fit if that is the reason you want a VPN.
Bitdefender VPN: Can I run it on Linux or a router?
No. There is no Linux client and no router firmware or manual configuration option, so coverage is limited to the Windows, macOS, iOS and Android clients.
Related pages
More on Bitdefender VPN
More on Ping Identity
Other head to heads
- Bitdefender VPN vs 1Password
- Bitdefender VPN vs Norton 360
- Bitdefender VPN vs LastPass
- Bitdefender VPN vs IBM QRadar
- Bitdefender VPN vs Quantexa
- Bitdefender VPN vs ExpressVPN
- Bitdefender VPN vs NordVPN
- Bitdefender VPN vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Bitdefender VPN vs Jamf Pro
- Bitdefender VPN vs Proofpoint
- Bitdefender VPN vs March Networks
- Bitdefender VPN vs Jumio
- Bitdefender VPN vs Kaspersky Total Security
- Bitdefender VPN vs LogicManager
- Bitdefender VPN vs Mullvad VPN
- Bitdefender VPN vs Private Internet Access
- Bitdefender VPN vs CyberGhost VPN
- Bitdefender VPN vs Frontegg
- Bitdefender VPN vs Speakeasy
- Bitdefender VPN vs Akeyless
- Bitdefender VPN vs authentik
- Bitdefender VPN vs Logto
- Bitdefender VPN vs Authelia
- Bitdefender VPN vs Transmit Security
- Bitdefender VPN vs Delinea
- Bitdefender VPN vs Genetec Security Center
- Bitdefender VPN vs VMware Carbon Black
- Bitdefender VPN vs Rhombus Systems
- Bitdefender VPN vs Yoti
- Bitdefender VPN vs Avast One
- Bitdefender VPN vs Chainguard
- Bitdefender VPN vs Cosign
- Ping Identity vs 1Password
- Ping Identity vs Norton 360
- Ping Identity vs LastPass
- Ping Identity vs IBM QRadar
- Ping Identity vs Quantexa
- Ping Identity vs ExpressVPN
- Ping Identity vs NordVPN
- Ping Identity vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Ping Identity vs Jamf Pro
- Ping Identity vs Proofpoint
- Ping Identity vs March Networks
- Ping Identity vs Jumio
- Ping Identity vs Kaspersky Total Security
- Ping Identity vs LogicManager
- Ping Identity vs Mullvad VPN
- Ping Identity vs Private Internet Access
- Ping Identity vs CyberGhost VPN
- Ping Identity vs Frontegg
- Ping Identity vs Speakeasy
- Ping Identity vs Akeyless
- Ping Identity vs authentik
- Ping Identity vs Logto
- Ping Identity vs Authelia
- Ping Identity vs Transmit Security
- Ping Identity vs Delinea
- Ping Identity vs Genetec Security Center
- Ping Identity vs VMware Carbon Black
- Ping Identity vs Rhombus Systems
- Ping Identity vs Yoti
- Ping Identity vs Avast One
- Ping Identity vs Chainguard
- Ping Identity vs Cosign
