Cybersecurity · head to head
Authy vs Ping Identity

Authy
Cybersecurity
Twilio's free authenticator app with encrypted cloud backup, mobile only since the desktop clients were withdrawn in 2024.
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Ping Identity
Cybersecurity
Enterprise identity for workforce and customers, with a 5,000 user floor
- From
- $3/month
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Authy has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Authy there is no export function for stored TOTP secrets, so moving to a different authenticator means disabling and re-enrolling two-factor authentication on every account individually, which is the reason most users stay rather than a reason anyone should choose it.; Ping Identity workforce pricing carries a 5,000 user annual minimum, so an organisation with 800 staff pays for 5,000 and the effective per user cost is over six times the list rate.
- They diverge on capability: Authy covers Encrypted cloud backup, Ping Identity covers Single sign-on.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Authy and Ping Identity actually diverge.
| Attribute | Authy | Ping Identity |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | $3/month |
| Pricing model | free | Per user per month |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Web | Web, Linux, Windows |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Authy
- Encrypted cloud backup
- Multi-device sync
- Standard TOTP
- Offline code generation
- App lock
- Multi-device toggle
- Token organisation
- Free with no account tier
Only in Ping Identity
- Single sign-on
- Adaptive MFA
- Identity orchestration
- API access management
- Directory services
- Flexible deployment
- ForgeRock capabilities
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Authy
- An individual who wants two-factor authentication on personal accounts and needs it to survive losing or replacing a phonenot Ping Identity
- A small team sharing access to a service account where the same tokens must be available on more than one handsetnot Ping Identity
- Replacing SMS-based codes with TOTP for someone who would abandon two-factor entirely if recovery were difficultnot Ping Identity
- Consolidating tokens scattered across several apps onto one device list with recognisable names and iconsnot Ping Identity
Ping Identity
- A bank that must keep identity data on premises in one country while running SaaS identity elsewherenot Authy
- An airline or telco with tens of millions of customer identities needing a directory that holds that scalenot Authy
- An enterprise assembling authentication journeys that call several external verification and risk vendorsnot Authy
- An existing ForgeRock customer deciding what its upgrade path looks like under Ping ownershipnot Authy
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Authy
- There is no export function for stored TOTP secrets, so moving to a different authenticator means disabling and re-enrolling two-factor authentication on every account individually, which is the reason most users stay rather than a reason anyone should choose it.
- The Windows, macOS and Linux desktop applications were discontinued in 2024 and stopped working, so any workflow that depended on copying codes on a computer now requires a phone in hand, and users who held tokens only on a desktop client had to restore from backup or re-enrol.
- The account is keyed to a phone number, so an attacker who takes over that number through a SIM swap can begin the device registration flow, and the only remaining control is the backup password that most users set once and cannot recall.
- In 2024 an unauthenticated Twilio endpoint allowed attackers to confirm which numbers from a supplied list were registered Authy accounts, exposing around 33 million phone numbers, which disclosed no codes but handed phishers a validated list of people known to use two-factor authentication.
- It is a free consumer application inside a company that has already retired the paid Authy developer API it once supported, so it carries no revenue of its own, and users should treat its continued existence as a business decision rather than a roadmap commitment.
Ping Identity
- Workforce pricing carries a 5,000 user annual minimum, so an organisation with 800 staff pays for 5,000 and the effective per user cost is over six times the list rate.
- Adaptive multi-factor authentication is in the Plus tier only, doubling the per user price for a capability many buyers assume is standard in a modern identity platform.
- ForgeRock no longer exists as an independent product, so customers who chose it specifically to avoid Ping now face a roadmap set by the vendor they did not pick.
- Thoma Bravo ownership across both merged companies means the commercial priority is margin, and buyers report firmer renewal negotiations than they saw before 2022.
- The portfolio has overlapping components from three product lineages, so scoping a deployment requires vendor architects and the licensing conversation is more complicated than the price list implies.
Pricing, plan by plan
Authy
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Authy review.
Ping Identity
$3/month- PingOne for Workforce Essential$3/month
- Minimum 5,000 users billed annually
- Single sign-on and directory services
- OAuth 2.0, OpenID Connect, SAML and SCIM
- PingOne for Workforce Plus$6/month
- Minimum 5,000 users billed annually
- Everything in Essential
- Adaptive multi-factor authentication
- PingOne for Customers Essential$35000/year
- Flat annual fee
- No-code identity orchestration
- Unified customer profiles
- PingOne for Customers Plus$50000/year
- Flat annual fee
- Everything in Essential
- Adaptive MFA and device management
Which should you pick?
Choose Authy if
- You need encrypted cloud backup.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want multi-device sync.
Choose Ping Identity if
- You need single sign-on.
- You work on Web, Linux, Windows.
- You also want adaptive mfa.
Questions people ask
- Is Authy or Ping Identity better?
- Neither clearly leads. Authy starts at Free and Ping Identity at $3/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Authy or Ping Identity?
- Authy has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Authy and $3/month for Ping Identity.
- Does Authy or Ping Identity run on more platforms?
- Authy runs on Web. Ping Identity runs on Web, Linux, Windows.
- Can I use Authy for free?
- Yes. Authy has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Ping Identity starts at $3/month.
- What is Authy best used for?
- Authy is most often used for an individual who wants two-factor authentication on personal accounts and needs it to survive losing or replacing a phone, a small team sharing access to a service account where the same tokens must be available on more than one handset, replacing sms-based codes with totp for someone who would abandon two-factor entirely if recovery were difficult, consolidating tokens scattered across several apps onto one device list with recognisable names and icons. Of those, an individual who wants two-factor authentication on personal accounts and needs it to survive losing or replacing a phone and a small team sharing access to a service account where the same tokens must be available on more than one handset are not what Ping Identity is typically brought in for.
- What can Authy do that Ping Identity cannot?
- Authy covers Encrypted cloud backup, Multi-device sync, Standard TOTP, Offline code generation. Ping Identity covers Single sign-on, Adaptive MFA, Identity orchestration, API access management.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Authy: Is Authy still supported?
The mobile apps for iOS and Android are still available and functional. The desktop applications were withdrawn in 2024 and the Authy developer API has been retired in favour of Twilio Verify, so the surrounding product has been shrinking.
Ping Identity: Can I still buy ForgeRock?
Not as a separate product. Ping acquired ForgeRock in 2023 and the capabilities are sold within the Ping portfolio. Existing customers should ask about the specific migration path for their components.
Authy: Can I export my tokens?
No. There is no export of the underlying secrets, by design. Migrating to another authenticator means going to each service, disabling two-factor authentication and setting it up again with the new app.
Ping Identity: What is the real minimum spend?
PingOne for Workforce Essential is 3 USD per user per month with a 5,000 user annual minimum, so roughly 180,000 USD a year before anything else.
Authy: What happened to the desktop app?
Twilio announced its discontinuation in March 2024 and the applications stopped working later that year. There is no replacement desktop client; the mobile apps are the product now.
Ping Identity: Is MFA included?
Basic authentication policies are in Essential. Adaptive MFA and passwordless require the Plus tier at 6 USD per user per month.
Authy: Is multi-device sync safe to leave on?
It is the feature most worth understanding. Leaving new device registration enabled means anyone who controls your phone number can attempt to add a device. The usual advice is to turn the multi-device setting off once your devices are registered and turn it on only when you need to add one.
Authy: What if I lose my phone and forget the backup password?
The secrets are encrypted with that password and Twilio does not hold it, so they cannot be recovered. You would fall back to each individual service's account recovery process, which is exactly the situation the backup was meant to avoid.
Related pages
More on Ping Identity
Other head to heads
- Authy vs LastPass
- Authy vs 1Password
- Authy vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Authy vs Norton 360
- Authy vs Google Authenticator
- Authy vs Cisco Duo
- Authy vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Authy vs RoboForm
- Authy vs ExpressVPN
- Authy vs Authelia
- Authy vs Stytch
- Authy vs WorkOS
- Authy vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- Authy vs Sticky Password
- Authy vs Surfshark
- Authy vs Tanium
- Authy vs Teleport
- Authy vs Frontegg
- Authy vs Speakeasy
- Authy vs Akeyless
- Authy vs authentik
- Authy vs Logto
- Authy vs Transmit Security
- Authy vs Delinea
- Authy vs Genetec Security Center
- Authy vs VMware Carbon Black
- Authy vs Rhombus Systems
- Authy vs Yoti
- Authy vs Avast One
- Authy vs Chainguard
- Authy vs Cosign
- Authy vs CyberGhost VPN
- Ping Identity vs LastPass
- Ping Identity vs 1Password
- Ping Identity vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Ping Identity vs Norton 360
- Ping Identity vs Google Authenticator
- Ping Identity vs Cisco Duo
- Ping Identity vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Ping Identity vs RoboForm
- Ping Identity vs ExpressVPN
- Ping Identity vs Authelia
- Ping Identity vs Stytch
- Ping Identity vs WorkOS
- Ping Identity vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- Ping Identity vs Sticky Password
- Ping Identity vs Surfshark
- Ping Identity vs Tanium
- Ping Identity vs Teleport
- Ping Identity vs Frontegg
- Ping Identity vs Speakeasy
- Ping Identity vs Akeyless
- Ping Identity vs authentik
- Ping Identity vs Logto
- Ping Identity vs Transmit Security
- Ping Identity vs Delinea
- Ping Identity vs Genetec Security Center
- Ping Identity vs VMware Carbon Black
- Ping Identity vs Rhombus Systems
- Ping Identity vs Yoti
- Ping Identity vs Avast One
- Ping Identity vs Chainguard
- Ping Identity vs Cosign
- Ping Identity vs CyberGhost VPN
