Cloud · head to head
Jaeger vs Wasabi
The short version
- Only Jaeger has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Jaeger tracing is only as good as the instrumentation, and partial instrumentation produces misleading gaps; Wasabi 90-day minimum storage duration with no option to delete before full period without penalty
- They diverge on capability: Jaeger covers Distributed trace search, Wasabi covers Hot Cloud Storage.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Jaeger and Wasabi actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cloud).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Jaeger
- Distributed trace search
- Dependency graph
- Adaptive sampling
- Pluggable storage
Only in Wasabi
- Hot Cloud Storage
- S3 Compatible API
- Object Lock
- Versioning
- Multi-region
- Data Migration Tools
- Immutability
- Ransomware Protection
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Jaeger
- Finding which service in a request path causes the latencynot Wasabi
- Understanding real service dependencies rather than the diagram on the wikinot Wasabi
- Debugging failures that only appear under production traffic patternsnot Wasabi
Wasabi
- Backup and recoverynot Jaeger
- Media storagenot Jaeger
- Archive replacementnot Jaeger
- Ransomware protectionnot Jaeger
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Jaeger
- Tracing is only as good as the instrumentation, and partial instrumentation produces misleading gaps
- Storage is the real operational cost: high-volume tracing on Elasticsearch or Cassandra is a cluster to run and pay for
- Traces alone, without correlated metrics and logs, leave you switching between tools during an incident
Wasabi
- 90-day minimum storage duration with no option to delete before full period without penalty
- Significantly smaller global footprint than AWS with only 16 regions, resulting in higher latency for users in underserved regions
- Performance can degrade with high-volume transactions requiring throughput management strategies
- Hot storage only, no cold/archival storage tier for long-term data at lower cost
- Support responsiveness gaps with teams experiencing multi-day waits for critical issue resolution
Pricing, plan by plan
Jaeger
Free- JaegerFree
- Full functionality
- No usage limits
- Community support
Wasabi
$7.99/monthNo published plan breakdown. See the Wasabi review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Jaeger if
- You need distributed trace search.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Kubernetes, Docker.
- You also want dependency graph.
Choose Wasabi if
- You need hot cloud storage.
- You work on Web, API.
- You also want s3 compatible api.
Questions people ask
- Is Jaeger or Wasabi better?
- Neither clearly leads. Jaeger starts at Free and Wasabi at $7.99/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Jaeger or Wasabi?
- Jaeger has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Jaeger and $7.99/month for Wasabi.
- Does Jaeger or Wasabi run on more platforms?
- Jaeger runs on Linux, Kubernetes, Docker. Wasabi runs on Web, API.
- Can I use Jaeger for free?
- Yes. Jaeger has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Wasabi starts at $7.99/month.
- What is Jaeger best used for?
- Jaeger is most often used for finding which service in a request path causes the latency, understanding real service dependencies rather than the diagram on the wiki, debugging failures that only appear under production traffic patterns. Of those, finding which service in a request path causes the latency and understanding real service dependencies rather than the diagram on the wiki are not what Wasabi is typically brought in for.
- What can Jaeger do that Wasabi cannot?
- Jaeger covers Distributed trace search, Dependency graph, Adaptive sampling, Pluggable storage. Wasabi covers Hot Cloud Storage, S3 Compatible API, Object Lock, Versioning.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Jaeger: Is Jaeger free?
Yes, open source and CNCF-graduated. Costs are the storage backend you run.
Wasabi: What is Wasabi's pricing structure?
Wasabi offers pay-as-you-go pricing at $7.99 per TB per month as of July 2026, with no egress or API request fees. Reserved capacity plans are available for multi-year terms with volume discounts.
SourceJaeger: Do I use Jaeger or OpenTelemetry?
Both, usually. Instrument with OpenTelemetry and use Jaeger to store and query the traces.
Wasabi: Does Wasabi charge for data downloads or API calls?
No. Wasabi includes zero egress fees and zero API request fees, which is a major cost advantage over AWS S3. Customers can plan their budget to the penny without worrying about surprise data transfer charges.
SourceJaeger: Does Jaeger handle metrics and logs?
No. It is a tracing system. Metrics and logs need Prometheus, Loki or an equivalent.
Wasabi: Is there a minimum storage duration requirement?
Yes. Wasabi enforces a 90-day minimum storage term. Users who delete data before 90 days are still charged for the full 90-day period.
SourceWasabi: Is Wasabi S3-compatible?
Yes. Wasabi Hot Cloud Storage is fully S3-compatible, meaning organizations can integrate it into existing workflows without rewriting application code used with AWS S3.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Jaeger vs Zipkin
- Jaeger vs Grafana Cloud
- Jaeger vs VictoriaMetrics
- Jaeger vs Fastly
- Jaeger vs HAProxy
- Jaeger vs Anyscale
- Jaeger vs Proxmox VE
- Jaeger vs Rancher
- Jaeger vs OpenEBS
- Jaeger vs DeepInfra
- Jaeger vs Go
- Jaeger vs Packer
- Jaeger vs Caddy
- Jaeger vs Cerebrium
- Jaeger vs K3s
- Jaeger vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Jaeger vs DigitalOcean
- Jaeger vs Hetzner Cloud
- Jaeger vs Scaleway
- Jaeger vs Linode
- Jaeger vs Vultr
- Jaeger vs Zeabur
- Jaeger vs Porter
- Jaeger vs Contabo
- Jaeger vs Encore
- Jaeger vs Google Cloud Platform
- Jaeger vs Microsoft Azure
- Jaeger vs IBM Cloud
- Jaeger vs kind
- Jaeger vs Koyeb
- Jaeger vs Kustomize
- Jaeger vs Linkerd
- Wasabi vs Zipkin
- Wasabi vs Grafana Cloud
- Wasabi vs VictoriaMetrics
- Wasabi vs Fastly
- Wasabi vs HAProxy
- Wasabi vs Anyscale
- Wasabi vs Proxmox VE
- Wasabi vs Rancher
- Wasabi vs OpenEBS
- Wasabi vs DeepInfra
- Wasabi vs Go
- Wasabi vs Packer
- Wasabi vs Caddy
- Wasabi vs Cerebrium
- Wasabi vs K3s
- Wasabi vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Wasabi vs DigitalOcean
- Wasabi vs Hetzner Cloud
- Wasabi vs Scaleway
- Wasabi vs Linode
- Wasabi vs Vultr
- Wasabi vs Zeabur
- Wasabi vs Porter
- Wasabi vs Contabo
- Wasabi vs Encore
- Wasabi vs Google Cloud Platform
- Wasabi vs Microsoft Azure
- Wasabi vs IBM Cloud
- Wasabi vs kind
- Wasabi vs Koyeb
- Wasabi vs Kustomize
- Wasabi vs Linkerd


