Cloud · head to head
DeepInfra vs Wasabi

DeepInfra
Cloud
Low-cost cloud API for running open-source AI models
- From
- $0.08/month
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: DeepInfra focuses on inference hosting rather than fine-tuning or full training pipelines that competitors like Fireworks AI offer.; Wasabi 90-day minimum storage duration with no option to delete before full period without penalty
- They diverge on capability: DeepInfra covers Open model hosting, Wasabi covers Hot Cloud Storage.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which DeepInfra and Wasabi actually diverge.
Identical on both: free tier (No), platforms (web, api), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cloud).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in DeepInfra
- Open model hosting
- Pay-per-token pricing
- Long context support
- DeepCluster
- Zero retention policy
- Real-time metrics
Only in Wasabi
- Hot Cloud Storage
- S3 Compatible API
- Object Lock
- Versioning
- Multi-region
- Data Migration Tools
- Immutability
- Ransomware Protection
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
DeepInfra
- Running open-source LLM inference without managing GPUsnot Wasabi
- Serving speech and image generation models via APInot Wasabi
- Cost-sensitive production inference at scalenot Wasabi
- Reserved GPU capacity via DeepCluster for steady workloadsnot Wasabi
Wasabi
- Backup and recoverynot DeepInfra
- Media storagenot DeepInfra
- Archive replacementnot DeepInfra
- Ransomware protectionnot DeepInfra
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
DeepInfra
- Focuses on inference hosting rather than fine-tuning or full training pipelines that competitors like Fireworks AI offer.
- Model selection is limited to what DeepInfra chooses to host, unlike self-managed platforms.
- No published free tier; usage is billed from the first token.
Wasabi
- 90-day minimum storage duration with no option to delete before full period without penalty
- Significantly smaller global footprint than AWS with only 16 regions, resulting in higher latency for users in underserved regions
- Performance can degrade with high-volume transactions requiring throughput management strategies
- Hot storage only, no cold/archival storage tier for long-term data at lower cost
- Support responsiveness gaps with teams experiencing multi-day waits for critical issue resolution
Pricing, plan by plan
DeepInfra
$0.08/month- Pay-as-you-go$undefined/mo
- Per-model token pricing from $0.08 to $2.85 per million input tokens
- No long-term contract
- DeepCluster$1.98/month
- Dedicated NVIDIA B300 GPU clusters at $1.98/GPU-hour
Wasabi
$7.99/monthNo published plan breakdown. See the Wasabi review.
Which should you pick?
Choose DeepInfra if
- You need open model hosting.
- You work on web, api.
- You also want pay-per-token pricing.
Choose Wasabi if
- You need hot cloud storage.
- You work on Web, API.
- You also want s3 compatible api.
Questions people ask
- Is DeepInfra or Wasabi better?
- Neither clearly leads. DeepInfra starts at $0.08/month and Wasabi at $7.99/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, DeepInfra or Wasabi?
- DeepInfra starts at $0.08/month and Wasabi at $7.99/month.
- Does DeepInfra or Wasabi run on more platforms?
- DeepInfra runs on web, api. Wasabi runs on Web, API.
- What is DeepInfra best used for?
- DeepInfra is most often used for running open-source llm inference without managing gpus, serving speech and image generation models via api, cost-sensitive production inference at scale, reserved gpu capacity via deepcluster for steady workloads. Of those, running open-source llm inference without managing gpus and serving speech and image generation models via api are not what Wasabi is typically brought in for.
- What can DeepInfra do that Wasabi cannot?
- DeepInfra covers Open model hosting, Pay-per-token pricing, Long context support, DeepCluster. Wasabi covers Hot Cloud Storage, S3 Compatible API, Object Lock, Versioning.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
DeepInfra: Is there a free tier on DeepInfra?
No free tier is published; usage is billed pay-as-you-go from the first token, though a credit card or pre-payment is required before you can send requests.
SourceWasabi: What is Wasabi's pricing structure?
Wasabi offers pay-as-you-go pricing at $7.99 per TB per month as of July 2026, with no egress or API request fees. Reserved capacity plans are available for multi-year terms with volume discounts.
SourceDeepInfra: How is usage priced?
Language models are billed per million input/output tokens, other models by inference execution time, and audio models per minute of audio processed, with no minimum commitment.
SourceWasabi: Does Wasabi charge for data downloads or API calls?
No. Wasabi includes zero egress fees and zero API request fees, which is a major cost advantage over AWS S3. Customers can plan their budget to the penny without worrying about surprise data transfer charges.
SourceDeepInfra: What are the Standard, Priority, and Flex tiers?
Standard is default best-effort pricing at 1x, Priority costs 1.5x for faster time-to-first-token during peak demand, and Flex costs 0.8x for non-production or asynchronous workloads.
SourceWasabi: Is there a minimum storage duration requirement?
Yes. Wasabi enforces a 90-day minimum storage term. Users who delete data before 90 days are still charged for the full 90-day period.
SourceDeepInfra: How does billing scale with spend?
Accounts advance through usage tiers as cumulative payments cross $20, $100, $500, $2,000, and $10,000 thresholds, with invoices generated monthly or at each threshold.
SourceWasabi: Is Wasabi S3-compatible?
Yes. Wasabi Hot Cloud Storage is fully S3-compatible, meaning organizations can integrate it into existing workflows without rewriting application code used with AWS S3.
DeepInfra: Is there a limit on concurrent requests?
Yes, accounts are limited to 200 concurrent requests by default, though spending limits can also be configured to prevent unexpected charges.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- DeepInfra vs Fireworks AI
- DeepInfra vs Anyscale
- DeepInfra vs Coolify
- DeepInfra vs Cerebrium
- DeepInfra vs Go
- DeepInfra vs Proxmox VE
- DeepInfra vs Rancher
- DeepInfra vs Jaeger
- DeepInfra vs Lambda
- DeepInfra vs Packer
- DeepInfra vs Serverless Framework
- DeepInfra vs Koyeb
- DeepInfra vs Microsoft Azure
- DeepInfra vs Nitric
- DeepInfra vs Longhorn
- DeepInfra vs Nomad
- DeepInfra vs Kustomize
- DeepInfra vs Linkerd
- DeepInfra vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- DeepInfra vs DigitalOcean
- DeepInfra vs Hetzner Cloud
- DeepInfra vs Scaleway
- DeepInfra vs Linode
- DeepInfra vs Vultr
- DeepInfra vs Zeabur
- DeepInfra vs Porter
- DeepInfra vs Contabo
- DeepInfra vs Encore
- DeepInfra vs Google Cloud Platform
- DeepInfra vs HAProxy
- DeepInfra vs IBM Cloud
- DeepInfra vs kind
- Wasabi vs Fireworks AI
- Wasabi vs Anyscale
- Wasabi vs Coolify
- Wasabi vs Cerebrium
- Wasabi vs Go
- Wasabi vs Proxmox VE
- Wasabi vs Rancher
- Wasabi vs Jaeger
- Wasabi vs Lambda
- Wasabi vs Packer
- Wasabi vs Serverless Framework
- Wasabi vs Koyeb
- Wasabi vs Microsoft Azure
- Wasabi vs Nitric
- Wasabi vs Longhorn
- Wasabi vs Nomad
- Wasabi vs Kustomize
- Wasabi vs Linkerd
- Wasabi vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Wasabi vs DigitalOcean
- Wasabi vs Hetzner Cloud
- Wasabi vs Scaleway
- Wasabi vs Linode
- Wasabi vs Vultr
- Wasabi vs Zeabur
- Wasabi vs Porter
- Wasabi vs Contabo
- Wasabi vs Encore
- Wasabi vs Google Cloud Platform
- Wasabi vs HAProxy
- Wasabi vs IBM Cloud
- Wasabi vs kind

