Cloud · head to head
Proxmox VE vs Wasabi

Proxmox VE
Cloud
Open-source hypervisor combining KVM and LXC virtualisation
- From
- €120/year
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Proxmox VE per-socket licensing model: cost scales with CPU socket count, not vCore count, resulting in high costs for multi-socket servers; Wasabi 90-day minimum storage duration with no option to delete before full period without penalty
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Proxmox VE and Wasabi actually diverge.
| Attribute | Proxmox VE | Wasabi |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | €120/year | $7.99/month |
| Pricing model | subscription | Unknown |
| Platforms | Linux, Web, API, Self-hosted | Web, API |
| Founded | Unknown | 2015 |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cloud).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Proxmox VE
Nothing recorded that Wasabi does not also cover.
Only in Wasabi
- Hot Cloud Storage
- S3 Compatible API
- Object Lock
- Versioning
- Multi-region
- Data Migration Tools
- Immutability
- Ransomware Protection
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Proxmox VE
- Open-source datacenter virtualisation for hosting providers and cloud platformsnot Wasabi
- Cost-sensitive enterprise virtualisation replacing commercial hypervisorsnot Wasabi
- High-availability clustering for disaster recovery and business continuitynot Wasabi
- Container deployments using LXC as lighter-weight alternative to Dockernot Wasabi
- Hybrid VM and container workloads in a single management interfacenot Wasabi
- Backup and archival infrastructure alongside primary virtualisationnot Wasabi
Wasabi
- Backup and recoverynot Proxmox VE
- Media storagenot Proxmox VE
- Archive replacementnot Proxmox VE
- Ransomware protectionnot Proxmox VE
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Proxmox VE
- Per-socket licensing model: cost scales with CPU socket count, not vCore count, resulting in high costs for multi-socket servers
- Linux-based host only; Windows hypervisors not supported, limiting adoption in Windows-focused organisations
- Clustering and high-availability setup requires operational expertise and careful network configuration
- Commercial support tiers limit advanced features (just-in-time access, network flow logs) to paid subscriptions
- Smaller ecosystem of third-party plugins and integrations compared to VMware vSphere
Wasabi
- 90-day minimum storage duration with no option to delete before full period without penalty
- Significantly smaller global footprint than AWS with only 16 regions, resulting in higher latency for users in underserved regions
- Performance can degrade with high-volume transactions requiring throughput management strategies
- Hot storage only, no cold/archival storage tier for long-term data at lower cost
- Support responsiveness gaps with teams experiencing multi-day waits for critical issue resolution
Pricing, plan by plan
Proxmox VE
€120/year- Community$120/year
- Enterprise Repository access
- Community forum support only
- Per-socket subscription model
- Basic$370/year
- 3 support tickets per year
- 1 business day response time
- Stable updates and Enterprise Repository
- Standard$550/year
- 10 support tickets per year
- 4-hour response time for critical issues
- Remote SSH support and offline updates
- Premium$1100/year
- Unlimited support tickets
- 2-hour response time for critical issues
- Remote SSH support and offline updates
Wasabi
$7.99/monthNo published plan breakdown. See the Wasabi review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Wasabi if
- You need hot cloud storage.
- You work on Web, API.
- You also want s3 compatible api.
Questions people ask
- Is Proxmox VE or Wasabi better?
- Neither clearly leads. Proxmox VE starts at €120/year and Wasabi at $7.99/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Proxmox VE or Wasabi?
- Proxmox VE starts at €120/year and Wasabi at $7.99/month.
- Does Proxmox VE or Wasabi run on more platforms?
- Proxmox VE runs on Linux, Web, API, Self-hosted. Wasabi runs on Web, API.
- What is Proxmox VE best used for?
- Proxmox VE is most often used for open-source datacenter virtualisation for hosting providers and cloud platforms, cost-sensitive enterprise virtualisation replacing commercial hypervisors, high-availability clustering for disaster recovery and business continuity, container deployments using lxc as lighter-weight alternative to docker. Of those, open-source datacenter virtualisation for hosting providers and cloud platforms and cost-sensitive enterprise virtualisation replacing commercial hypervisors are not what Wasabi is typically brought in for.
- What can Proxmox VE do that Wasabi cannot?
- Wasabi covers Hot Cloud Storage, S3 Compatible API, Object Lock, Versioning.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Proxmox VE: What is the licensing model for Proxmox VE?
Proxmox VE is open-source and free to deploy. Optional subscription tiers provide technical support, priority response times, and access to the Enterprise Repository for stable update channels. All tiers include identical virtualisation features.
SourceWasabi: What is Wasabi's pricing structure?
Wasabi offers pay-as-you-go pricing at $7.99 per TB per month as of July 2026, with no egress or API request fees. Reserved capacity plans are available for multi-year terms with volume discounts.
SourceProxmox VE: Can I run Proxmox VE without a support subscription?
Yes. Community Edition (€120/year per socket) provides Enterprise Repository access with community-based support through forums. The core Proxmox VE platform is fully functional without any subscription.
SourceWasabi: Does Wasabi charge for data downloads or API calls?
No. Wasabi includes zero egress fees and zero API request fees, which is a major cost advantage over AWS S3. Customers can plan their budget to the penny without worrying about surprise data transfer charges.
SourceProxmox VE: What hypervisors does Proxmox VE support?
Proxmox VE includes both KVM for full virtualisation and LXC for Linux containers. It does not support Xen or Hyper-V. Workloads on those platforms must be migrated or reimplemented.
SourceWasabi: Is there a minimum storage duration requirement?
Yes. Wasabi enforces a 90-day minimum storage term. Users who delete data before 90 days are still charged for the full 90-day period.
SourceWasabi: Is Wasabi S3-compatible?
Yes. Wasabi Hot Cloud Storage is fully S3-compatible, meaning organizations can integrate it into existing workflows without rewriting application code used with AWS S3.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Proxmox VE vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Proxmox VE vs Neon
- Proxmox VE vs DigitalOcean
- Proxmox VE vs Grafana Cloud
- Proxmox VE vs Rancher
- Proxmox VE vs Longhorn
- Proxmox VE vs Vultr
- Proxmox VE vs OpenEBS
- Proxmox VE vs Anyscale
- Proxmox VE vs Go
- Proxmox VE vs Chef
- Proxmox VE vs Fireworks AI
- Proxmox VE vs Heroku
- Proxmox VE vs Vault
- Proxmox VE vs Beam Cloud
- Proxmox VE vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Proxmox VE vs Jaeger
- Proxmox VE vs Hetzner Cloud
- Proxmox VE vs Scaleway
- Proxmox VE vs Linode
- Proxmox VE vs Zeabur
- Proxmox VE vs Porter
- Proxmox VE vs Contabo
- Proxmox VE vs Encore
- Proxmox VE vs Google Cloud Platform
- Proxmox VE vs Microsoft Azure
- Proxmox VE vs HAProxy
- Proxmox VE vs IBM Cloud
- Proxmox VE vs kind
- Proxmox VE vs Koyeb
- Proxmox VE vs Kustomize
- Proxmox VE vs Linkerd
- Wasabi vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Wasabi vs Neon
- Wasabi vs DigitalOcean
- Wasabi vs Grafana Cloud
- Wasabi vs Rancher
- Wasabi vs Longhorn
- Wasabi vs Vultr
- Wasabi vs OpenEBS
- Wasabi vs Anyscale
- Wasabi vs Go
- Wasabi vs Chef
- Wasabi vs Fireworks AI
- Wasabi vs Heroku
- Wasabi vs Vault
- Wasabi vs Beam Cloud
- Wasabi vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Wasabi vs Jaeger
- Wasabi vs Hetzner Cloud
- Wasabi vs Scaleway
- Wasabi vs Linode
- Wasabi vs Zeabur
- Wasabi vs Porter
- Wasabi vs Contabo
- Wasabi vs Encore
- Wasabi vs Google Cloud Platform
- Wasabi vs Microsoft Azure
- Wasabi vs HAProxy
- Wasabi vs IBM Cloud
- Wasabi vs kind
- Wasabi vs Koyeb
- Wasabi vs Kustomize
- Wasabi vs Linkerd

