Softwr

Design · head to head

InVision vs Sourcegraph

InVision logo

InVision

Design

Digital product design platform

From
Free
Free plan
Yes
Visit InVisionFull review
Sourcegraph logo

Sourcegraph

Developer Tools

Code search and intelligence platform for large codebases with Cody AI assistant

From
$16000/year
Free plan
No
Visit SourcegraphFull review

The short version

  • InVision is a digital product design platform; Sourcegraph is an enterprise code intelligence platform.
  • InVision has a free plan, then $25/mo; Sourcegraph starts at $16000/yr.
  • Where InVision falls short: service discontinued as of end of 2024; no longer available or supported.
  • Where Sourcegraph falls short: enterprise pricing starting at $16k annually creates significant barrier for small teams.
  • Prices and features on this page were last checked on 13 November 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which InVision and Sourcegraph actually diverge.

Attributes where InVision and Sourcegraph differ
AttributeInVisionSourcegraph
Starting priceFree$16000/year
Free tierYesNo
PlatformsWeb, macOS, Windows, iOS, AndroidWeb, Self-hosted
CategoryDesignDeveloper Tools

Not yet recorded: pricing model for InVision, founded for Sourcegraph.

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in InVision

  • Interactive prototypes
  • Design collaboration
  • Freehand whiteboarding
  • Design system manager
  • Inspect mode
  • Comments & feedback
  • Version control
  • User testing

Only in Sourcegraph

Nothing recorded that InVision does not also cover.

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

InVision

  • Prototype creationnot Sourcegraph
  • Design feedbacknot Sourcegraph
  • Whiteboarding sessionsnot Sourcegraph
  • Design handoffnot Sourcegraph
  • User testingnot Sourcegraph

Sourcegraph

  • Large-scale code migrations across hundreds of repositoriesnot InVision
  • Enterprise governance and code ownership trackingnot InVision
  • AI-assisted bug hunting and security pattern detectionnot InVision
  • Onboarding engineers into large unfamiliar codebasesnot InVision
  • Regulatory compliance and code audit trailsnot InVision

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

InVision

  • Service discontinued as of end of 2024; no longer available or supported
  • Workflow required constant switching between design software (Sketch/Photoshop) and InVision for prototyping, creating inefficiency
  • Performance issues and glitches reported, especially with larger projects
  • Limited development capabilities; required additional hosting and developer support for deployment
  • Could not export working web or mobile applications without additional development

Sourcegraph

  • Enterprise pricing starting at $16k annually creates significant barrier for small teams
  • No free tier or standard plan published; all options require custom sales engagement
  • Complex enterprise-only positioning limits adoption compared to GitHub Copilot's pervasiveness
  • Requires indexing entire codebase; not suitable for small or ephemeral projects

Pricing, plan by plan

InVision

Free

No published plan breakdown. See the InVision review.

Sourcegraph

$16000/year
  • Enterprise$16,000/yr
    • Scales with team size
    • Credits for AI features per user
    • Deep Search

Which should you pick?

Choose InVision if

  • You need interactive prototypes.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You work on Web, macOS, Windows, iOS, Android.
  • You also want design collaboration.
InVision review

Choose Sourcegraph if

  • You work on Web, Self-hosted.
Sourcegraph review

Questions people ask

Is InVision or Sourcegraph better?
Neither clearly leads. InVision starts at Free and Sourcegraph at $16000/year, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, InVision or Sourcegraph?
InVision has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for InVision and $16000/year for Sourcegraph.
Does InVision or Sourcegraph run on more platforms?
InVision runs on Web, macOS, Windows, iOS, Android. Sourcegraph runs on Web, Self-hosted.
Can I use InVision for free?
Yes. InVision has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Sourcegraph starts at $16000/year.
What is InVision best used for?
InVision is most often used for prototype creation, design feedback, whiteboarding sessions, design handoff. Of those, prototype creation and design feedback are not what Sourcegraph is typically brought in for.
What can InVision do that Sourcegraph cannot?
InVision covers Interactive prototypes, Design collaboration, Freehand whiteboarding, Design system manager.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

InVision: Is InVision still active and supported in 2026?

No. InVision announced discontinuation of all services by end of 2024. The platform is no longer available or supported.

Source
InVision: What were InVision's core features?

InVision allowed designers to transform designs into interactive prototypes and mockups for web and mobile. It supported Craft Player for Sketch, Craft Sync for Photoshop, and preview mode in Studio, enabling design-to-prototype workflows.

Source
InVision: What were InVision's pricing plans?

InVision offered Free ($0), Starter ($25/month), Professional ($99/month), and Team plans. Annual billing provided a 10% discount. Free plan included basic prototyping; paid plans added collaboration and file access.

Source
InVision: Why did InVision fail in the market?

InVision's market position was disrupted by Figma, which unified design, prototyping, and collaboration in a single web-based platform. InVision required switching between design software and prototyping, creating friction and reducing competitiveness.

Source
InVision: What integrations did InVision support?

InVision integrated with design tools like Sketch and Photoshop, and supported sharing and collaboration workflows. The platform did not support deployment or direct development integration.

Source
Share

Related pages

More on InVision

More on Sourcegraph

Keep looking

Other head to heads