Government · head to head
Incode vs Signicat

Signicat
Cybersecurity
European digital identity hub connecting national eID schemes
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Incode incode is now sold as Tyler ERP Pro and tylertech.com/products/incode redirects to the ERP Pro product page; Signicat national eID scheme fees are passed through on top of Signicat's own charge, so a single-country business almost always pays less by integrating with the scheme directly.
- They diverge on capability: Incode covers General Ledger, Signicat covers eID scheme brokering.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Incode and Signicat actually diverge.
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Incode
- General Ledger
- Accounts Payable
- Payroll Management
- Utility Billing
- Budget Management
- Bank Integrations
- ADP
- Third-party Payroll
Only in Signicat
- eID scheme brokering
- Qualified electronic signatures
- Document verification
- AML screening
- Authentication
- Digital onboarding flows
- eIDAS compliance
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Incode
- Financial management and ERP for small and mid-sized local governmentsnot Signicat
- Utility billing, payroll and human resources for city and county administrationnot Signicat
- Court and public safety records for municipalitiesnot Signicat
Signicat
- A lender expanding from Norway into Sweden, Denmark and the Netherlands without four separate eID integrationsnot Incode
- An insurer needing eIDAS qualified signatures on policy documents that will hold up in a European courtnot Incode
- A bank that wants customers to onboard with their existing national bank ID rather than photographing a passportnot Incode
- A public sector body needing cross-border recognition of notified eID schemes under eIDASnot Incode
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Incode
- Incode is now sold as Tyler ERP Pro and tylertech.com/products/incode redirects to the ERP Pro product page
- No pricing is published; Tyler routes all enquiries through contact and demo requests with no published rate, minimum or cost driver
- The product is sold only to public sector organisations
Signicat
- National eID scheme fees are passed through on top of Signicat's own charge, so a single-country business almost always pays less by integrating with the scheme directly.
- Value is concentrated in Northern and Western Europe, and coverage in Southern and Eastern Europe is thinner, so a pan-European rollout still hits gaps requiring document fallback.
- Pricing is per transaction and quoted, and because scheme rates vary by country the cost per onboarded customer differs materially between markets in ways that complicate unit economics.
- Each eID scheme connection typically carries its own setup fee and approval process, so adding a country is a project with a lead time rather than a configuration change.
- Availability is tied to the national schemes, meaning an outage at BankID or MitID stops your onboarding entirely and there is no vendor-side mitigation for it.
Pricing, plan by plan
Incode
$700/month- Municipal Suite$700/month
- Financial Management
- HR/Payroll
- Utility Billing
Signicat
On request- Signicat Platform$undefined/year
- Priced per transaction with national scheme fees passed through
- Signature and verification products licensed separately
- Setup fee per eID scheme connected
Which should you pick?
Choose Incode if
- You need general ledger.
- You work on Web, Desktop.
- You also want accounts payable.
Choose Signicat if
- You need eid scheme brokering.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want qualified electronic signatures.
Questions people ask
- Is Incode or Signicat better?
- Neither clearly leads. Incode starts at $700/month and Signicat at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Incode or Signicat?
- Incode starts at $700/month and Signicat at On request.
- Does Incode or Signicat run on more platforms?
- Incode runs on Web, Desktop. Signicat runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- What is Incode best used for?
- Incode is most often used for financial management and erp for small and mid-sized local governments, utility billing, payroll and human resources for city and county administration, court and public safety records for municipalities. Of those, financial management and erp for small and mid-sized local governments and utility billing, payroll and human resources for city and county administration are not what Signicat is typically brought in for.
- What can Incode do that Signicat cannot?
- Incode covers General Ledger, Accounts Payable, Payroll Management, Utility Billing. Signicat covers eID scheme brokering, Qualified electronic signatures, Document verification, AML screening.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Signicat: Is this an alternative to a document verification vendor?
Only where national eID exists. In markets with a mature bank ID scheme it is better; elsewhere you fall back to document checks, which Signicat also provides.
Signicat: Do we still pay the eID schemes?
Yes. Scheme fees are passed through in addition to Signicat charges. Ask for the split when comparing to a direct integration.
Signicat: Are signatures legally qualified?
Signicat supports eIDAS qualified electronic signatures, which carry the highest legal standing in the EU, as well as advanced signatures.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Incode vs CivicPlus
- Incode vs Granicus
- Incode vs Accela
- Incode vs DocuWare
- Incode vs Workday Government
- Incode vs Springbrook Software
- Incode vs SAP for Government
- Incode vs Mapbox Government
- Incode vs OpenCities
- Incode vs CentralSquare
- Incode vs Axon Records
- Incode vs Nextdoor for Government
- Incode vs Oracle Government Cloud
- Incode vs Palantir Gotham
- Incode vs Periscope Holdings
- Incode vs Ring Neighbors
- Incode vs CivicPlus Asset Management
- Incode vs Jumio
- Incode vs Sumsub
- Incode vs IDnow
- Incode vs Trulioo
- Incode vs Veriff
- Incode vs iDenfy
- Incode vs Yoti
- Incode vs Shufti Pro
- Incode vs Socure
- Incode vs March Networks
- Incode vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Incode vs Semperis
- Incode vs MetricStream
- Incode vs Microsoft Defender
- Incode vs Mimecast
- Incode vs Motorola Vigilant
- Incode vs Nessus
- Incode vs Microsoft Sentinel
- Signicat vs CivicPlus
- Signicat vs Granicus
- Signicat vs Accela
- Signicat vs DocuWare
- Signicat vs Workday Government
- Signicat vs Springbrook Software
- Signicat vs SAP for Government
- Signicat vs Mapbox Government
- Signicat vs OpenCities
- Signicat vs CentralSquare
- Signicat vs Axon Records
- Signicat vs Nextdoor for Government
- Signicat vs Oracle Government Cloud
- Signicat vs Palantir Gotham
- Signicat vs Periscope Holdings
- Signicat vs Ring Neighbors
- Signicat vs CivicPlus Asset Management
- Signicat vs Jumio
- Signicat vs Sumsub
- Signicat vs IDnow
- Signicat vs Trulioo
- Signicat vs Veriff
- Signicat vs iDenfy
- Signicat vs Yoti
- Signicat vs Shufti Pro
- Signicat vs Socure
- Signicat vs March Networks
- Signicat vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Signicat vs Semperis
- Signicat vs MetricStream
- Signicat vs Microsoft Defender
- Signicat vs Mimecast
- Signicat vs Motorola Vigilant
- Signicat vs Nessus
- Signicat vs Microsoft Sentinel

