Cybersecurity · head to head
IBM QRadar vs Trimble Unity Maintain

IBM QRadar
Cybersecurity
Enterprise SIEM licensed by events per second, whose cloud business IBM sold to Palo Alto Networks in 2024.
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No

Trimble Unity Maintain
Government
GIS-centric public asset and work management, the product formerly sold as Cityworks
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Each has a real cost: IBM QRadar iBM sold the QRadar SaaS business to Palo Alto Networks in 2024 and those customers are being moved to Cortex XSIAM, so anyone buying today is choosing an on-premises product whose vendor has publicly moved the cloud future to a competitor, and the support horizon becomes a contract negotiation rather than an assumption.; Trimble Unity Maintain esri ArcGIS is a hard prerequisite, so an organisation without it faces a second substantial licence and a GIS programme before the maintenance system can be used at all.
- They diverge on capability: IBM QRadar covers Offence model, Trimble Unity Maintain covers Built on ArcGIS.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which IBM QRadar and Trimble Unity Maintain actually diverge.
| Attribute | IBM QRadar | Trimble Unity Maintain |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | subscription | quote |
| Platforms | Web, Api | Web, iOS, Android, Windows |
| Category | Cybersecurity | Government |
| Founded | 1911 | Unknown |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in IBM QRadar
- Offence model
- Network flow analysis
- Device Support Modules
- Ariel query language
- Rules and building blocks
- Deployment topology
- App Exchange
- Use Case Manager
Only in Trimble Unity Maintain
- Built on ArcGIS
- Service requests
- Work order management
- Permits and licensing
- Mobile field access
- Storeroom and inventory
- Operational Insights
- AgileAssets convergence
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
IBM QRadar
- A regulated enterprise that must keep log data on premises or in a specific jurisdiction and cannot use a shared SaaS SIEMnot Trimble Unity Maintain
- A SOC that wants log correlation and network flow analysis in one platform rather than buying an NDR product separatelynot Trimble Unity Maintain
- An existing QRadar estate deciding whether to stay on premises or accept the migration path to a different vendor's platformnot Trimble Unity Maintain
- Compliance-driven log retention and reporting where the audit requirement is specific about collection, retention and reportingnot Trimble Unity Maintain
Trimble Unity Maintain
- A water utility wanting valve exercising and hydrant flushing recorded against the same GIS features the engineering team maintainsnot IBM QRadar
- A city consolidating a citizen service request line, work orders and inspections into one location-based systemnot IBM QRadar
- A state transportation department managing pavement and bridge assets with linear referencing rather than point assetsnot IBM QRadar
- A public works department that has already licensed ArcGIS Enterprise and wants to avoid rekeying its asset inventorynot IBM QRadar
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
IBM QRadar
- IBM sold the QRadar SaaS business to Palo Alto Networks in 2024 and those customers are being moved to Cortex XSIAM, so anyone buying today is choosing an on-premises product whose vendor has publicly moved the cloud future to a competitor, and the support horizon becomes a contract negotiation rather than an assumption.
- Licensing is by events per second and flows per minute, so every additional log source raises the cost directly and teams routinely exclude verbose sources such as DNS, proxy, endpoint and cloud audit logs to stay under the licence, which strips out exactly the data an investigation later needs.
- It needs a dedicated operator: rule tuning, parser work and offence triage are continuous jobs, and an organisation that deploys QRadar without at least one named engineer accumulates thousands of unreviewed offences and a false sense of coverage.
- A log source without a matching Device Support Module arrives unparsed, and writing a custom parser with regular expressions against an unfamiliar payload format is specialist work that can take days per source, which quietly determines which systems ever get monitored.
- On-premises capacity is planned across consoles, processors, collectors and data nodes, so outgrowing the sizing means procuring and racking more appliances rather than changing a subscription tier, and growth becomes a purchasing cycle measured in months.
Trimble Unity Maintain
- Esri ArcGIS is a hard prerequisite, so an organisation without it faces a second substantial licence and a GIS programme before the maintenance system can be used at all.
- The product is mid-rename from Cityworks to Trimble Unity Maintain with transition timelines Trimble has not committed to publicly, leaving contracts, documentation and integrator experience split between two names.
- CVE-2025-0994, a deserialisation flaw in Cityworks, was exploited in the wild and listed by CISA in February 2025, which makes on-premise deployments a patching obligation rather than a set-and-forget install.
- Because assets live in the GIS, changing the asset model is a GIS division change, so maintenance teams cannot restructure their own hierarchy without another department in the loop.
- It is built for North American public sector practice, and the permitting, funding source and reporting models do not map cleanly onto other countries or onto private industrial estates.
Pricing, plan by plan
IBM QRadar
On request- QRadar SIEMFree
- Event and flow processing
- Offense management
- Threat intelligence
- QRadar CloudFree
- Cloud-native deployment
- Elastic scaling
- Managed infrastructure
- QRadar SuiteFree
- SIEM + SOAR + XDR
- Unified analyst experience
- Federated search
Trimble Unity Maintain
On request- Trimble Unity Maintain$undefined/year
- Annual subscription sized by population served, asset volume and user count
- Esri ArcGIS Enterprise or ArcGIS Online licensing required separately
- Hosted and on-premise deployment priced differently
Which should you pick?
Choose IBM QRadar if
- You need offence model.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want network flow analysis.
Choose Trimble Unity Maintain if
- You need built on arcgis.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android, Windows.
- You also want service requests.
Questions people ask
- Is IBM QRadar or Trimble Unity Maintain better?
- Neither clearly leads. IBM QRadar starts at On request and Trimble Unity Maintain at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, IBM QRadar or Trimble Unity Maintain?
- IBM QRadar starts at On request and Trimble Unity Maintain at On request.
- Does IBM QRadar or Trimble Unity Maintain run on more platforms?
- IBM QRadar runs on Web, Api. Trimble Unity Maintain runs on Web, iOS, Android, Windows.
- What is IBM QRadar best used for?
- IBM QRadar is most often used for a regulated enterprise that must keep log data on premises or in a specific jurisdiction and cannot use a shared saas siem, a soc that wants log correlation and network flow analysis in one platform rather than buying an ndr product separately, an existing qradar estate deciding whether to stay on premises or accept the migration path to a different vendor's platform, compliance-driven log retention and reporting where the audit requirement is specific about collection, retention and reporting. Of those, a regulated enterprise that must keep log data on premises or in a specific jurisdiction and cannot use a shared saas siem and a soc that wants log correlation and network flow analysis in one platform rather than buying an ndr product separately are not what Trimble Unity Maintain is typically brought in for.
- What can IBM QRadar do that Trimble Unity Maintain cannot?
- IBM QRadar covers Offence model, Network flow analysis, Device Support Modules, Ariel query language. Trimble Unity Maintain covers Built on ArcGIS, Service requests, Work order management, Permits and licensing.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
IBM QRadar: Who owns QRadar now?
It is split. IBM sold the QRadar SaaS assets to Palo Alto Networks in a deal announced in May 2024 and closed that September, and those customers are being migrated to Cortex XSIAM. IBM retains and supports the on-premises product.
Trimble Unity Maintain: Is Cityworks discontinued?
Not discontinued, renamed. It is becoming Trimble Unity Maintain, converging with AgileAssets, and Trimble has not published a final transition date.
IBM QRadar: Is QRadar being discontinued?
IBM has committed to continuing support for on-premises customers, including security updates, while offering migration assistance. The cloud product's future belongs to Palo Alto. If you are signing a multi-year term, get the support horizon written into the contract.
Trimble Unity Maintain: Do I need Esri ArcGIS?
Yes. The product is built on ArcGIS and cannot be deployed without an Esri licence.
IBM QRadar: How is it licensed?
By events per second for logs and flows per minute for network data, with the software or appliance sized to that rate. Add-on modules in the suite are licensed separately.
Trimble Unity Maintain: Was there a security incident?
Yes. CVE-2025-0994 in Cityworks was exploited in the wild and added to the CISA known exploited vulnerabilities catalogue in February 2025.
IBM QRadar: What is an offence?
QRadar's term for a correlated case. Rules group related events and flows against a common indicator such as a host or user, so an analyst reviews one offence rather than the hundreds of events behind it.
Trimble Unity Maintain: Can it handle roads and pavement as well as pipes?
Yes, through the AgileAssets lineage now inside the Unity Maintain family, which adds linear referencing for transportation assets.
IBM QRadar: Do I need a full-time engineer?
In practice yes for anything beyond a small deployment. Parser development, rule tuning and offence triage do not stop, and the most common failure mode is a well-installed QRadar that nobody has tuned since go-live.
Related pages
More on Trimble Unity Maintain
Other head to heads
- IBM QRadar vs Bitdefender Total Security
- IBM QRadar vs 1Password
- IBM QRadar vs Norton 360
- IBM QRadar vs LastPass
- IBM QRadar vs Microsoft Sentinel
- IBM QRadar vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- IBM QRadar vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- IBM QRadar vs LogRhythm SIEM
- IBM QRadar vs Recorded Future
- IBM QRadar vs SentinelOne Singularity
- IBM QRadar vs Proofpoint
- IBM QRadar vs Trend Micro Vision One
- IBM QRadar vs Arnica
- IBM QRadar vs Authelia
- IBM QRadar vs Authy
- IBM QRadar vs Baffle
- IBM QRadar vs Beyond Identity
- IBM QRadar vs BeyondTrust
- IBM QRadar vs CivicPlus Asset Management
- IBM QRadar vs VUEWorks
- IBM QRadar vs NEXGEN Asset Management
- IBM QRadar vs CentralSquare Asset Management
- IBM QRadar vs RecDesk
- IBM QRadar vs DataSF
- IBM QRadar vs CityView
- IBM QRadar vs Euna Solutions
- IBM QRadar vs Clariti
- IBM QRadar vs Springbrook Software
- IBM QRadar vs OpenGov
- IBM QRadar vs Bidnet Direct
- IBM QRadar vs ShotSpotter
- IBM QRadar vs Tyler Brazos
- IBM QRadar vs Vigilant Solutions
- IBM QRadar vs Workday Government
- IBM QRadar vs Zencity
- Trimble Unity Maintain vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Trimble Unity Maintain vs 1Password
- Trimble Unity Maintain vs Norton 360
- Trimble Unity Maintain vs LastPass
- Trimble Unity Maintain vs Microsoft Sentinel
- Trimble Unity Maintain vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- Trimble Unity Maintain vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- Trimble Unity Maintain vs LogRhythm SIEM
- Trimble Unity Maintain vs Recorded Future
- Trimble Unity Maintain vs SentinelOne Singularity
- Trimble Unity Maintain vs Proofpoint
- Trimble Unity Maintain vs Trend Micro Vision One
- Trimble Unity Maintain vs Arnica
- Trimble Unity Maintain vs Authelia
- Trimble Unity Maintain vs Authy
- Trimble Unity Maintain vs Baffle
- Trimble Unity Maintain vs Beyond Identity
- Trimble Unity Maintain vs BeyondTrust
- Trimble Unity Maintain vs CivicPlus Asset Management
- Trimble Unity Maintain vs VUEWorks
- Trimble Unity Maintain vs NEXGEN Asset Management
- Trimble Unity Maintain vs CentralSquare Asset Management
- Trimble Unity Maintain vs RecDesk
- Trimble Unity Maintain vs DataSF
- Trimble Unity Maintain vs CityView
- Trimble Unity Maintain vs Euna Solutions
- Trimble Unity Maintain vs Clariti
- Trimble Unity Maintain vs Springbrook Software
- Trimble Unity Maintain vs OpenGov
- Trimble Unity Maintain vs Bidnet Direct
- Trimble Unity Maintain vs ShotSpotter
- Trimble Unity Maintain vs Tyler Brazos
- Trimble Unity Maintain vs Vigilant Solutions
- Trimble Unity Maintain vs Workday Government
- Trimble Unity Maintain vs Zencity
