Cybersecurity · head to head
HID Global vs Very Good Security

HID Global
Cybersecurity
Physical access control, credential issuance and workforce authentication hardware and software
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Very Good Security
Cybersecurity
Tokenisation proxy that keeps card and personal data out of your own systems and out of PCI scope
- From
- $1000/month
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: HID Global sales run through integrators, so the price you get depends on which partner quotes it and there is no published list to negotiate against.; Very Good Security vGS sits in the live path of every request carrying sensitive data, so its latency and availability become yours, and an outage in the proxy is a payment outage no matter how healthy your own systems are.
- They diverge on capability: HID Global covers Physical access readers, Very Good Security covers Aliasing proxy.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which HID Global and Very Good Security actually diverge.
| Attribute | HID Global | Very Good Security |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | $1000/month |
| Pricing model | quote | Per month |
| Platforms | Web, Windows, iOS, Android | Web, API |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in HID Global
- Physical access readers
- Mobile access
- Seos credential technology
- Card issuance
- Workforce authentication
- Visitor management
Only in Very Good Security
- Aliasing proxy
- PCI scope reduction
- Network tokenisation
- Processor optionality
- Card issuing data
- Vault and access controls
- Data residency options
- Compliance artefacts
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
HID Global
- An enterprise moving from plastic badges to phone-based credentials without replacing every reader in the estatenot Very Good Security
- A government agency needing card issuance and PKI credentials under a national identity programmenot Very Good Security
- A hospital consolidating access control, visitor screening and clinician authentication onto one credentialnot Very Good Security
- An organisation retiring cloneable legacy proximity cards after a physical penetration test found them trivially copiednot Very Good Security
Very Good Security
- A marketplace facing its first PCI DSS Level 1 assessment that wants to keep card data off its own estate rather than harden a dozen servicesnot HID Global
- A merchant negotiating with a second acquirer that needs card credentials portable so the negotiation is real rather than theoreticalnot HID Global
- A fintech collecting bank account and identity documents that wants sensitive fields absent from logs, backups and analytics warehouses by constructionnot HID Global
- A card issuer that must display a full PAN in its own mobile app without the app or its backend touching cardholder datanot HID Global
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
HID Global
- Sales run through integrators, so the price you get depends on which partner quotes it and there is no published list to negotiate against.
- Mobile credentials are charged per identity as an ongoing fee, which converts a one-off card cost into a recurring per-employee subscription that budgets rarely anticipate.
- Large estates run mixed generations of readers, so a credential upgrade is a multi-year hardware programme and the software licence is a small fraction of the true cost.
- Legacy credential technologies still widely deployed have documented cloning weaknesses, and HID commercial interest in selling the replacement does not remove your exposure in the interim.
- The portfolio spans hardware, firmware and several acquired software products, so integration between HID own components is less consistent than the single-vendor pitch implies.
Very Good Security
- VGS sits in the live path of every request carrying sensitive data, so its latency and availability become yours, and an outage in the proxy is a payment outage no matter how healthy your own systems are.
- Token portability is the whole selling point yet leaving VGS means migrating tokens back out, a project the vendor has no incentive to streamline, so the lock-in you removed from your acquirer partly moves to VGS.
- Entry pricing at around one thousand US dollars a month is real money for a pre-revenue fintech, and it buys volume-limited throughput, so cost scales with exactly the growth that made you buy it.
- Scope reduction is not scope elimination: your QSA still assesses how you integrate, and teams regularly discover that a support tool or an internal admin screen pulled plaintext back in and dragged systems into scope again.
- Proxy-based interception constrains how you design request flows, and non-standard payloads, streaming uploads or binary formats often need custom routing rules that make debugging production issues noticeably harder.
Pricing, plan by plan
HID Global
On request- HID Access and Identity Products$undefined/year
- Hardware, credentials and software quoted through channel partners
- Credential costs charged per card or per mobile identity
- Reader hardware and installation quoted separately
Very Good Security
$1000/month- Starter$1000/month
- Aliasing proxy
- Vault storage
- PCI scope reduction
- Growth$undefined/month
- Network tokenisation
- Multiple processors
- Data residency options
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Custom vault architecture
- Dedicated support and SLA
- Contractual compliance coverage
Which should you pick?
Choose HID Global if
- You need physical access readers.
- You work on Web, Windows, iOS, Android.
- You also want mobile access.
Choose Very Good Security if
- You need aliasing proxy.
- You work on Web, API.
- You also want pci scope reduction.
Questions people ask
- Is HID Global or Very Good Security better?
- Neither clearly leads. HID Global starts at On request and Very Good Security at $1000/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, HID Global or Very Good Security?
- HID Global starts at On request and Very Good Security at $1000/month.
- Does HID Global or Very Good Security run on more platforms?
- HID Global runs on Web, Windows, iOS, Android. Very Good Security runs on Web, API.
- What is HID Global best used for?
- HID Global is most often used for an enterprise moving from plastic badges to phone-based credentials without replacing every reader in the estate, a government agency needing card issuance and pki credentials under a national identity programme, a hospital consolidating access control, visitor screening and clinician authentication onto one credential, an organisation retiring cloneable legacy proximity cards after a physical penetration test found them trivially copied. Of those, an enterprise moving from plastic badges to phone-based credentials without replacing every reader in the estate and a government agency needing card issuance and pki credentials under a national identity programme are not what Very Good Security is typically brought in for.
- What can HID Global do that Very Good Security cannot?
- HID Global covers Physical access readers, Mobile access, Seos credential technology, Card issuance. Very Good Security covers Aliasing proxy, PCI scope reduction, Network tokenisation, Processor optionality.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
HID Global: Do we have to replace readers to use mobile credentials?
Often yes, at least in part. Reader capability determines which credential technologies work, and that hardware cost dominates the business case.
Very Good Security: Does VGS make me PCI compliant?
No. It removes cardholder data from your systems so your assessment covers a far smaller boundary, but you still complete an assessment and your integration is part of it.
HID Global: Are mobile credentials cheaper than cards?
Not necessarily. Cards are a one-off cost per employee, mobile identities are typically a recurring charge, so the crossover depends on staff turnover.
Very Good Security: Can I move to another processor without re-collecting cards?
Yes, that is a core reason people buy it. The vault reveals stored credentials to whichever processor you route to.
HID Global: Can we buy directly from HID?
Generally not for access control deployments. Products are sold and installed through channel partners, so partner selection is part of the buying decision.
Very Good Security: What does it cost?
Published entry pricing is about one thousand US dollars per month; growth and enterprise tiers are quoted.
Very Good Security: Is it only for card data?
No. The proxy handles any sensitive field, including bank details, national identifiers and documents, though payments is where the product is now focused.
Related pages
More on Very Good Security
Other head to heads
- HID Global vs Cisco Duo
- HID Global vs Doppler
- HID Global vs Authelia
- HID Global vs 1Password
- HID Global vs Clerk
- HID Global vs Frontegg
- HID Global vs authentik
- HID Global vs Logto
- HID Global vs Ory
- HID Global vs Beyond Identity
- HID Global vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- HID Global vs Saviynt
- HID Global vs Securiti
- HID Global vs Sigstore
- HID Global vs Speakeasy
- HID Global vs Sysdig
- HID Global vs Tenable
- HID Global vs Ory Kratos
- HID Global vs Baffle
- HID Global vs HashiCorp Vault
- HID Global vs Feedzai
- HID Global vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- HID Global vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- HID Global vs LastPass
- HID Global vs DataGrail
- HID Global vs Transcend
- HID Global vs Tuta
- HID Global vs Delinea
- HID Global vs Envysion
- HID Global vs HashiCorp Boundary
- Very Good Security vs Cisco Duo
- Very Good Security vs Doppler
- Very Good Security vs Authelia
- Very Good Security vs 1Password
- Very Good Security vs Clerk
- Very Good Security vs Frontegg
- Very Good Security vs authentik
- Very Good Security vs Logto
- Very Good Security vs Ory
- Very Good Security vs Beyond Identity
- Very Good Security vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Very Good Security vs Saviynt
- Very Good Security vs Securiti
- Very Good Security vs Sigstore
- Very Good Security vs Speakeasy
- Very Good Security vs Sysdig
- Very Good Security vs Tenable
- Very Good Security vs Ory Kratos
- Very Good Security vs Baffle
- Very Good Security vs HashiCorp Vault
- Very Good Security vs Feedzai
- Very Good Security vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Very Good Security vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Very Good Security vs LastPass
- Very Good Security vs DataGrail
- Very Good Security vs Transcend
- Very Good Security vs Tuta
- Very Good Security vs Delinea
- Very Good Security vs Envysion
- Very Good Security vs HashiCorp Boundary
