Cybersecurity · head to head
Speakeasy vs Very Good Security

Speakeasy
Cybersecurity
AI control plane for governing enterprise agents, MCP servers, and skills
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Very Good Security
Cybersecurity
Tokenisation proxy that keeps card and personal data out of your own systems and out of PCI scope
- From
- $1000/month
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Speakeasy no self-serve pricing is published; every plan requires a sales conversation.; Very Good Security vGS sits in the live path of every request carrying sensitive data, so its latency and availability become yours, and an outage in the proxy is a payment outage no matter how healthy your own systems are.
- They diverge on capability: Speakeasy covers AI tool catalog, Very Good Security covers Aliasing proxy.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Speakeasy and Very Good Security actually diverge.
| Attribute | Speakeasy | Very Good Security |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | $1000/month |
| Pricing model | quote | Per month |
Identical on both: free tier (No), platforms (web, api), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Speakeasy
- AI tool catalog
- Per-agent identity
- Role-based access control
- Real-time policy enforcement
- Audit logging
- MDM and SSO integration
Only in Very Good Security
- Aliasing proxy
- PCI scope reduction
- Network tokenisation
- Processor optionality
- Card issuing data
- Vault and access controls
- Data residency options
- Compliance artefacts
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Speakeasy
- Governing AI agents at enterprise scalenot Very Good Security
- Preventing shadow AI tool sprawlnot Very Good Security
- Enforcing least-privilege access for agentsnot Very Good Security
- Auditing AI tool call activity for compliancenot Very Good Security
Very Good Security
- A marketplace facing its first PCI DSS Level 1 assessment that wants to keep card data off its own estate rather than harden a dozen servicesnot Speakeasy
- A merchant negotiating with a second acquirer that needs card credentials portable so the negotiation is real rather than theoreticalnot Speakeasy
- A fintech collecting bank account and identity documents that wants sensitive fields absent from logs, backups and analytics warehouses by constructionnot Speakeasy
- A card issuer that must display a full PAN in its own mobile app without the app or its backend touching cardholder datanot Speakeasy
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Speakeasy
- No self-serve pricing is published; every plan requires a sales conversation.
- The product pivoted away from its original SDK-generation offering, so past documentation and customers built on that use case are no longer the focus.
- Requires integration with an existing identity provider such as Okta or Entra ID to be useful, so it is not a standalone solution.
- No published free tier or trial pricing was found.
Very Good Security
- VGS sits in the live path of every request carrying sensitive data, so its latency and availability become yours, and an outage in the proxy is a payment outage no matter how healthy your own systems are.
- Token portability is the whole selling point yet leaving VGS means migrating tokens back out, a project the vendor has no incentive to streamline, so the lock-in you removed from your acquirer partly moves to VGS.
- Entry pricing at around one thousand US dollars a month is real money for a pre-revenue fintech, and it buys volume-limited throughput, so cost scales with exactly the growth that made you buy it.
- Scope reduction is not scope elimination: your QSA still assesses how you integrate, and teams regularly discover that a support tool or an internal admin screen pulled plaintext back in and dragged systems into scope again.
- Proxy-based interception constrains how you design request flows, and non-standard payloads, streaming uploads or binary formats often need custom routing rules that make debugging production issues noticeably harder.
Pricing, plan by plan
Speakeasy
On request- Enterprise$undefined/mo
- Custom pricing
- AI tool catalog and visibility
- Per-agent identity and access control
Very Good Security
$1000/month- Starter$1000/month
- Aliasing proxy
- Vault storage
- PCI scope reduction
- Growth$undefined/month
- Network tokenisation
- Multiple processors
- Data residency options
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Custom vault architecture
- Dedicated support and SLA
- Contractual compliance coverage
Which should you pick?
Choose Speakeasy if
- You need ai tool catalog.
- You work on web, api.
- You also want per-agent identity.
Choose Very Good Security if
- You need aliasing proxy.
- You work on Web, API.
- You also want pci scope reduction.
Questions people ask
- Is Speakeasy or Very Good Security better?
- Neither clearly leads. Speakeasy starts at On request and Very Good Security at $1000/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Speakeasy or Very Good Security?
- Speakeasy starts at On request and Very Good Security at $1000/month.
- Does Speakeasy or Very Good Security run on more platforms?
- Speakeasy runs on web, api. Very Good Security runs on Web, API.
- What is Speakeasy best used for?
- Speakeasy is most often used for governing ai agents at enterprise scale, preventing shadow ai tool sprawl, enforcing least-privilege access for agents, auditing ai tool call activity for compliance. Of those, governing ai agents at enterprise scale and preventing shadow ai tool sprawl are not what Very Good Security is typically brought in for.
- What can Speakeasy do that Very Good Security cannot?
- Speakeasy covers AI tool catalog, Per-agent identity, Role-based access control, Real-time policy enforcement. Very Good Security covers Aliasing proxy, PCI scope reduction, Network tokenisation, Processor optionality.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Speakeasy: How much does Speakeasy cost?
Speakeasy offers an Enterprise tier with features including SaaS catalog integrations, custom server creation, code mode efficiency, and serverless hosting. No specific pricing is published; interested parties contact the company to discuss pricing.
SourceVery Good Security: Does VGS make me PCI compliant?
No. It removes cardholder data from your systems so your assessment covers a far smaller boundary, but you still complete an assessment and your integration is part of it.
Speakeasy: What is included in Speakeasy's Enterprise plan?
The Enterprise plan includes SaaS catalog integrations, custom server creation, code mode efficiency, and serverless hosting. Customers contact Speakeasy to discuss their specific pricing for these features.
SourceVery Good Security: Can I move to another processor without re-collecting cards?
Yes, that is a core reason people buy it. The vault reveals stored credentials to whichever processor you route to.
Very Good Security: What does it cost?
Published entry pricing is about one thousand US dollars per month; growth and enterprise tiers are quoted.
Very Good Security: Is it only for card data?
No. The proxy handles any sensitive field, including bank details, national identifiers and documents, though payments is where the product is now focused.
Related pages
More on Very Good Security
Other head to heads
- Speakeasy vs Doppler
- Speakeasy vs Akeyless
- Speakeasy vs Tenable
- Speakeasy vs Endor Labs
- Speakeasy vs Frontegg
- Speakeasy vs Netwrix
- Speakeasy vs Securiti
- Speakeasy vs Qualys VMDR
- Speakeasy vs Transcend
- Speakeasy vs Omada Identity
- Speakeasy vs Saviynt
- Speakeasy vs Arnica
- Speakeasy vs Trend Micro Vision One
- Speakeasy vs TunnelBear
- Speakeasy vs Vanta
- Speakeasy vs Acunetix
- Speakeasy vs Aikido
- Speakeasy vs Baffle
- Speakeasy vs HashiCorp Vault
- Speakeasy vs Feedzai
- Speakeasy vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Speakeasy vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Speakeasy vs LastPass
- Speakeasy vs DataGrail
- Speakeasy vs 1Password
- Speakeasy vs Tuta
- Speakeasy vs Delinea
- Speakeasy vs Envysion
- Speakeasy vs HashiCorp Boundary
- Very Good Security vs Doppler
- Very Good Security vs Akeyless
- Very Good Security vs Tenable
- Very Good Security vs Endor Labs
- Very Good Security vs Frontegg
- Very Good Security vs Netwrix
- Very Good Security vs Securiti
- Very Good Security vs Qualys VMDR
- Very Good Security vs Transcend
- Very Good Security vs Omada Identity
- Very Good Security vs Saviynt
- Very Good Security vs Arnica
- Very Good Security vs Trend Micro Vision One
- Very Good Security vs TunnelBear
- Very Good Security vs Vanta
- Very Good Security vs Acunetix
- Very Good Security vs Aikido
- Very Good Security vs Baffle
- Very Good Security vs HashiCorp Vault
- Very Good Security vs Feedzai
- Very Good Security vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Very Good Security vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Very Good Security vs LastPass
- Very Good Security vs DataGrail
- Very Good Security vs 1Password
- Very Good Security vs Tuta
- Very Good Security vs Delinea
- Very Good Security vs Envysion
- Very Good Security vs HashiCorp Boundary
