Cybersecurity · head to head
HashiCorp Boundary vs Very Good Security

HashiCorp Boundary
Cybersecurity
Identity-aware session broker for infrastructure access without distributing credentials
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Very Good Security
Cybersecurity
Tokenisation proxy that keeps card and personal data out of your own systems and out of PCI scope
- From
- $1000/month
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only HashiCorp Boundary has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: HashiCorp Boundary hashiCorp was acquired by IBM in February 2025 and Enterprise licensing now runs through IBM Passport Advantage; IBM has already retired HCP Vault Secrets, so Boundary's roadmap depends on IBM portfolio decisions rather than HashiCorp's own product strategy.; Very Good Security vGS sits in the live path of every request carrying sensitive data, so its latency and availability become yours, and an outage in the proxy is a payment outage no matter how healthy your own systems are.
- They diverge on capability: HashiCorp Boundary covers Identity-based access, Very Good Security covers Aliasing proxy.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which HashiCorp Boundary and Very Good Security actually diverge.
| Attribute | HashiCorp Boundary | Very Good Security |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | $1000/month |
| Pricing model | Open source, no licence fee | Per month |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Linux, macOS, Windows, Web | Web, API |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in HashiCorp Boundary
- Identity-based access
- Just-in-time credentials
- Dynamic host catalogues
- Session recording
- Transparent sessions
- Multi-hop workers
- Audit logging
- Terraform provider
Only in Very Good Security
- Aliasing proxy
- PCI scope reduction
- Network tokenisation
- Processor optionality
- Card issuing data
- Vault and access controls
- Data residency options
- Compliance artefacts
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
HashiCorp Boundary
- A platform team replacing shared SSH keys and a bastion host so that leavers lose access the moment they are removed from the identity providernot Very Good Security
- Granting contractors time-boxed database access without ever issuing them a credential they could keepnot Very Good Security
- An estate where autoscaling replaces hosts continuously and a static access list is always out of datenot Very Good Security
- Producing session recordings as evidence for an audit that requires proof of who touched production and what they rannot Very Good Security
Very Good Security
- A marketplace facing its first PCI DSS Level 1 assessment that wants to keep card data off its own estate rather than harden a dozen servicesnot HashiCorp Boundary
- A merchant negotiating with a second acquirer that needs card credentials portable so the negotiation is real rather than theoreticalnot HashiCorp Boundary
- A fintech collecting bank account and identity documents that wants sensitive fields absent from logs, backups and analytics warehouses by constructionnot HashiCorp Boundary
- A card issuer that must display a full PAN in its own mobile app without the app or its backend touching cardholder datanot HashiCorp Boundary
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
HashiCorp Boundary
- HashiCorp was acquired by IBM in February 2025 and Enterprise licensing now runs through IBM Passport Advantage; IBM has already retired HCP Vault Secrets, so Boundary's roadmap depends on IBM portfolio decisions rather than HashiCorp's own product strategy.
- Enterprise pricing is not published anywhere, and the features most organisations actually need for compliance, notably session recording, are Enterprise only, so the free community edition is rarely the version you end up buying.
- It solves access to infrastructure, not to applications; browser-based internal tools, SaaS admin consoles and APIs need a separate control, so Boundary is one component of a zero-trust programme rather than the whole thing.
- Running it yourself means operating controllers, worker nodes and a Postgres database in a highly available configuration, and if that control plane is down nobody can reach production, which makes it a new critical dependency.
- It is materially easier to adopt if you already run Vault and Terraform; teams without that ecosystem face a steeper learning curve than a device-based mesh product like Tailscale, for a similar access outcome.
Very Good Security
- VGS sits in the live path of every request carrying sensitive data, so its latency and availability become yours, and an outage in the proxy is a payment outage no matter how healthy your own systems are.
- Token portability is the whole selling point yet leaving VGS means migrating tokens back out, a project the vendor has no incentive to streamline, so the lock-in you removed from your acquirer partly moves to VGS.
- Entry pricing at around one thousand US dollars a month is real money for a pre-revenue fintech, and it buys volume-limited throughput, so cost scales with exactly the growth that made you buy it.
- Scope reduction is not scope elimination: your QSA still assesses how you integrate, and teams regularly discover that a support tool or an internal admin screen pulled plaintext back in and dragged systems into scope again.
- Proxy-based interception constrains how you design request flows, and non-standard payloads, streaming uploads or binary formats often need custom routing rules that make debugging production issues noticeably harder.
Pricing, plan by plan
HashiCorp Boundary
Free- Boundary Community EditionFree
- MPL 2.0 open source
- Self-hosted controllers and workers
- Identity-based target access
- Boundary Enterprise$undefined/year
- Session recording and playback
- Multi-hop and transparent sessions
- Multi-tenancy via scopes
Very Good Security
$1000/month- Starter$1000/month
- Aliasing proxy
- Vault storage
- PCI scope reduction
- Growth$undefined/month
- Network tokenisation
- Multiple processors
- Data residency options
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Custom vault architecture
- Dedicated support and SLA
- Contractual compliance coverage
Which should you pick?
Choose HashiCorp Boundary if
- You need identity-based access.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows, Web.
- You also want just-in-time credentials.
Choose Very Good Security if
- You need aliasing proxy.
- You work on Web, API.
- You also want pci scope reduction.
Questions people ask
- Is HashiCorp Boundary or Very Good Security better?
- Neither clearly leads. HashiCorp Boundary starts at Free and Very Good Security at $1000/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, HashiCorp Boundary or Very Good Security?
- HashiCorp Boundary has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for HashiCorp Boundary and $1000/month for Very Good Security.
- Does HashiCorp Boundary or Very Good Security run on more platforms?
- HashiCorp Boundary runs on Linux, macOS, Windows, Web. Very Good Security runs on Web, API.
- Can I use HashiCorp Boundary for free?
- Yes. HashiCorp Boundary has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Very Good Security starts at $1000/month.
- What is HashiCorp Boundary best used for?
- HashiCorp Boundary is most often used for a platform team replacing shared ssh keys and a bastion host so that leavers lose access the moment they are removed from the identity provider, granting contractors time-boxed database access without ever issuing them a credential they could keep, an estate where autoscaling replaces hosts continuously and a static access list is always out of date, producing session recordings as evidence for an audit that requires proof of who touched production and what they ran. Of those, a platform team replacing shared ssh keys and a bastion host so that leavers lose access the moment they are removed from the identity provider and granting contractors time-boxed database access without ever issuing them a credential they could keep are not what Very Good Security is typically brought in for.
- What can HashiCorp Boundary do that Very Good Security cannot?
- HashiCorp Boundary covers Identity-based access, Just-in-time credentials, Dynamic host catalogues, Session recording. Very Good Security covers Aliasing proxy, PCI scope reduction, Network tokenisation, Processor optionality.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
HashiCorp Boundary: Is Boundary open source?
The community edition is, under MPL 2.0. Boundary Enterprise is commercial and is now sold through IBM Passport Advantage.
Very Good Security: Does VGS make me PCI compliant?
No. It removes cardholder data from your systems so your assessment covers a far smaller boundary, but you still complete an assessment and your integration is part of it.
HashiCorp Boundary: Does it replace a VPN?
For infrastructure access, largely yes. It grants a session to a specific target rather than putting the user on a network, but it does not cover browser-based internal applications.
Very Good Security: Can I move to another processor without re-collecting cards?
Yes, that is a core reason people buy it. The vault reveals stored credentials to whichever processor you route to.
HashiCorp Boundary: What does Boundary Enterprise cost?
HashiCorp does not publish Boundary pricing. It is quoted, and since the IBM acquisition it is transacted on IBM licensing paper.
Very Good Security: What does it cost?
Published entry pricing is about one thousand US dollars per month; growth and enterprise tiers are quoted.
HashiCorp Boundary: Do I need Vault to use it?
No, but the just-in-time credential brokering that makes Boundary worthwhile depends on Vault or an equivalent secrets store.
Very Good Security: Is it only for card data?
No. The proxy handles any sensitive field, including bank details, national identifiers and documents, though payments is where the product is now focused.
Related pages
More on HashiCorp Boundary
More on Very Good Security
Other head to heads
- HashiCorp Boundary vs BeyondTrust
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Teleport
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Delinea
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Infisical
- HashiCorp Boundary vs 1Password
- HashiCorp Boundary vs LastPass
- HashiCorp Boundary vs authentik
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Logto
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Ory
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Saviynt
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Beyond Identity
- HashiCorp Boundary vs One Identity
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Keygen
- HashiCorp Boundary vs KnowBe4
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Legit Security
- HashiCorp Boundary vs LogRhythm SIEM
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Metasploit
- HashiCorp Boundary vs MetricStream
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Baffle
- HashiCorp Boundary vs HashiCorp Vault
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Feedzai
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Securiti
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- HashiCorp Boundary vs DataGrail
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Transcend
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Doppler
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Tuta
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Envysion
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Frontegg
- Very Good Security vs BeyondTrust
- Very Good Security vs Teleport
- Very Good Security vs Delinea
- Very Good Security vs Infisical
- Very Good Security vs 1Password
- Very Good Security vs LastPass
- Very Good Security vs authentik
- Very Good Security vs Logto
- Very Good Security vs Ory
- Very Good Security vs Saviynt
- Very Good Security vs Beyond Identity
- Very Good Security vs One Identity
- Very Good Security vs Keygen
- Very Good Security vs KnowBe4
- Very Good Security vs Legit Security
- Very Good Security vs LogRhythm SIEM
- Very Good Security vs Metasploit
- Very Good Security vs MetricStream
- Very Good Security vs Baffle
- Very Good Security vs HashiCorp Vault
- Very Good Security vs Feedzai
- Very Good Security vs Securiti
- Very Good Security vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Very Good Security vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Very Good Security vs DataGrail
- Very Good Security vs Transcend
- Very Good Security vs Doppler
- Very Good Security vs Tuta
- Very Good Security vs Envysion
- Very Good Security vs Frontegg
