Software · head to head
Hetzner Cloud vs Vagrant
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Hetzner Cloud cost-Optimized plans are shown as currently unavailable; Vagrant vagrant 2.4.3 and later is licensed under the Business Source License 1.1 with IBM Corporation as licensor, not an OSI open source licence
- They diverge on capability: Hetzner Cloud covers Cloud servers, Vagrant covers Box management.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Hetzner Cloud and Vagrant actually diverge.
| Attribute | Hetzner Cloud | Vagrant |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | usage-based | open-source |
| Platforms | Web, Api, Cli | Linux, Windows, Mac |
| Founded | 1997 | 2010 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Hetzner Cloud
- Cloud servers
- Block storage
- Object storage
- Load balancers
- Networks
- Firewalls
- Floating IPs
- Backups
Only in Vagrant
- Box management
- Provider support
- Multi-machine setups
- Provisioners
- Networking
- Synced folders
- Snapshots
- Plugins
Both cover
- Ansible
- Docker
- Cloud deployment
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Hetzner Cloud
- Low-cost virtual servers for development and testingnot Vagrant
- European hosting with data held in Germany or Finlandnot Vagrant
- Workloads with heavy egress, where included traffic mattersnot Vagrant
- Self-hosting applications away from the hyperscalersnot Vagrant
Vagrant
- Reproducible local development environments defined in a Vagrantfilenot Hetzner Cloud
- Provisioning identical VMs across VirtualBox, VMware and Hyper-V for a teamnot Hetzner Cloud
- Sandboxing multi-machine setups on a developer laptopnot Hetzner Cloud
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Hetzner Cloud
- Cost-Optimized plans are shown as currently unavailable
- The shared-resource tiers are positioned for variable usage and development rather than sustained production workloads
- Regions are limited to Germany, Finland, the United States and Singapore, so latency to other markets is a real constraint
- The uptime guarantee is 99.9 percent, below what the large hyperscalers offer on comparable services
- Support is 24/7 by email, without a phone channel
Vagrant
- Vagrant 2.4.3 and later is licensed under the Business Source License 1.1 with IBM Corporation as licensor, not an OSI open source licence
- The Additional Use Grant forbids offering Vagrant to third parties on a hosted or embedded basis in a paid product that competes with IBM's paid versions of Vagrant
- Each version converts to the MPL 2.0 Change License only four years after that version is first published
- Uses that fall outside the Additional Use Grant require a separately negotiated licence from the licensor
Pricing, plan by plan
Hetzner Cloud
Free- CX11$3.29/month
- 1 vCPU
- 1GB RAM
- 25GB SSD
- CX21$6.59/month
- 2 vCPU
- 4GB RAM
- 40GB SSD
Vagrant
Free- Open SourceFree
- Development environment provisioning
- Multiple providers
- Provisioner support
Which should you pick?
Choose Hetzner Cloud if
- You need cloud servers.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Api, Cli.
- You also want block storage.
Choose Vagrant if
- You need box management.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Windows, Mac.
- You also want provider support.
Questions people ask
- Is Hetzner Cloud or Vagrant better?
- Neither clearly leads. Hetzner Cloud starts at Free and Vagrant at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Hetzner Cloud or Vagrant?
- Hetzner Cloud starts at Free and Vagrant at Free.
- Does Hetzner Cloud or Vagrant run on more platforms?
- Hetzner Cloud runs on Web, Api, Cli. Vagrant runs on Linux, Windows, Mac.
- Can I use Hetzner Cloud for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Hetzner Cloud best used for?
- Hetzner Cloud is most often used for low-cost virtual servers for development and testing, european hosting with data held in germany or finland, workloads with heavy egress, where included traffic matters, self-hosting applications away from the hyperscalers. Of those, low-cost virtual servers for development and testing and european hosting with data held in germany or finland are not what Vagrant is typically brought in for.
- What can Hetzner Cloud do that Vagrant cannot?
- Hetzner Cloud covers Cloud servers, Block storage, Object storage, Load balancers. Vagrant covers Box management, Provider support, Multi-machine setups, Provisioners. Both handle Ansible, Docker, Cloud deployment.
Related pages
More on Hetzner Cloud
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Hetzner Cloud vs Grafana Cloud
- Hetzner Cloud vs Neon
- Hetzner Cloud vs DigitalOcean
- Hetzner Cloud vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Hetzner Cloud vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Hetzner Cloud vs Deno Deploy
- Hetzner Cloud vs Heroku
- Hetzner Cloud vs Linode
- Hetzner Cloud vs Packer
- Hetzner Cloud vs Pulumi
- Hetzner Cloud vs Render
- Hetzner Cloud vs Upstash
- Hetzner Cloud vs Vultr
- Hetzner Cloud vs Akamai
- Hetzner Cloud vs Alibaba Cloud
- Hetzner Cloud vs Chef
- Hetzner Cloud vs Contabo
- Vagrant vs Grafana Cloud
- Vagrant vs Neon
- Vagrant vs DigitalOcean
- Vagrant vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Vagrant vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Vagrant vs Deno Deploy
- Vagrant vs Heroku
- Vagrant vs Linode
- Vagrant vs Packer
- Vagrant vs Pulumi
- Vagrant vs Render
- Vagrant vs Upstash
- Vagrant vs Vultr
- Vagrant vs Akamai
- Vagrant vs Alibaba Cloud
- Vagrant vs Chef
- Vagrant vs Contabo


