Cloud · head to head
Hetzner Cloud vs Infracost

Infracost
Cloud
Cloud cost estimates in pull requests, with governance in the paid tier
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Hetzner Cloud cost-Optimized plans are shown as currently unavailable; Infracost usage-based resources such as object storage, serverless functions and data transfer have no cost without monthly usage figures supplied by hand, and the documentation warns plainly that engineers otherwise read them as free.
- They diverge on capability: Hetzner Cloud covers Cloud servers, Infracost covers Pull request cost diffs.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Hetzner Cloud and Infracost actually diverge.
| Attribute | Hetzner Cloud | Infracost |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | usage-based | Free open source tool, then per month by run volume |
| Platforms | Web, Api, Cli | Web, macOS, Linux, Windows, Docker |
| Founded | 1997 | Unknown |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cloud).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Hetzner Cloud
- Cloud servers
- Block storage
- Object storage
- Load balancers
- Networks
- Firewalls
- Floating IPs
- Backups
Only in Infracost
- Pull request cost diffs
- Multi-format parsing
- Apache-2.0 CLI
- FinOps policies
- Automated remediation
- IDE integration
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Hetzner Cloud
- Low-cost virtual servers for development and testingnot Infracost
- European hosting with data held in Germany or Finlandnot Infracost
- Workloads with heavy egress, where included traffic mattersnot Infracost
- Self-hosting applications away from the hyperscalersnot Infracost
Infracost
- Teams that want an expensive infrastructure change questioned at review rather than discovered on an invoicenot Hetzner Cloud
- Platform groups enforcing tagging so cloud spend can be attributed to a team at allnot Hetzner Cloud
- Organisations adopting FinOps practice without buying a full cloud management platformnot Hetzner Cloud
- Engineers who want a cost figure in the editor while writing the Terraformnot Hetzner Cloud
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Hetzner Cloud
- Cost-Optimized plans are shown as currently unavailable
- The shared-resource tiers are positioned for variable usage and development rather than sustained production workloads
- Regions are limited to Germany, Finland, the United States and Singapore, so latency to other markets is a real constraint
- The uptime guarantee is 99.9 percent, below what the large hyperscalers offer on comparable services
- Support is 24/7 by email, without a phone channel
Infracost
- Usage-based resources such as object storage, serverless functions and data transfer have no cost without monthly usage figures supplied by hand, and the documentation warns plainly that engineers otherwise read them as free.
- Splitting production from non-production usage assumptions is not supported in the free usage file, which the docs attribute to a missing project filter, so that separation requires the paid product.
- The step from 250 to 1,000 dollars a month is large and the Cloud tier includes only ten admin seats, with developer seats charged at a figure that is not published, so the cost for a large organisation cannot be computed from the pricing page.
- Estimates are list price. Negotiated agreements, committed use discounts and reserved instance economics require SKU-level overrides available only on Enterprise, so the number in the pull request is not the number on the bill.
- The share of the product covered by the Apache-2.0 licence is shrinking. Checks, automated fixes, policies and agent integrations are all hosted-only, so the permissive licence increasingly protects the estimation engine rather than the product.
Pricing, plan by plan
Hetzner Cloud
Free- CX11$3.29/month
- 1 vCPU
- 1GB RAM
- 25GB SSD
- CX21$6.59/month
- 2 vCPU
- 4GB RAM
- 40GB SSD
Infracost
Free- FreeFree
- 1,000 runs a month
- Terraform, CloudFormation and CDK estimates
- Community support
- Starter$250/month
- 10,000 runs a month
- Email support
- Cloud$1000/month
- Ten admin seats, developer seats charged separately
- FinOps policies and cost guardrails
- Dashboards and audit trails
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- SKU-level price overrides for negotiated rates
- Business unit reporting
- SSO with SAML group mapping
Which should you pick?
Choose Hetzner Cloud if
- You need cloud servers.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Api, Cli.
- You also want block storage.
Choose Infracost if
- You need pull request cost diffs.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, macOS, Linux, Windows, Docker.
- You also want multi-format parsing.
Questions people ask
- Is Hetzner Cloud or Infracost better?
- Neither clearly leads. Hetzner Cloud starts at Free and Infracost at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Hetzner Cloud or Infracost?
- Hetzner Cloud starts at Free and Infracost at Free.
- Does Hetzner Cloud or Infracost run on more platforms?
- Hetzner Cloud runs on Web, Api, Cli. Infracost runs on Web, macOS, Linux, Windows, Docker.
- Can I use Hetzner Cloud for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Hetzner Cloud best used for?
- Hetzner Cloud is most often used for low-cost virtual servers for development and testing, european hosting with data held in germany or finland, workloads with heavy egress, where included traffic matters, self-hosting applications away from the hyperscalers. Of those, low-cost virtual servers for development and testing and european hosting with data held in germany or finland are not what Infracost is typically brought in for.
- What can Hetzner Cloud do that Infracost cannot?
- Hetzner Cloud covers Cloud servers, Block storage, Object storage, Load balancers. Infracost covers Pull request cost diffs, Multi-format parsing, Apache-2.0 CLI, FinOps policies.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Hetzner Cloud: What types of cloud plans does Hetzner Cloud offer?
Hetzner Cloud offers Shared Resource plans (Cost-Optimized and Regular Performance) for development and testing, and Dedicated Resource plans (General Purpose) for business applications. Plans are available with a price calculator on their website.
SourceInfracost: Is the open source version genuinely useful on its own?
Yes, for estimation. It parses your definitions and produces breakdowns and diffs locally. What it does not do is comment on pull requests, enforce policy or report across an organisation, all of which are hosted-only.
Hetzner Cloud: What is included with Hetzner Cloud servers?
Every cloud server comes with free one-click apps like Docker, WordPress, Nextcloud, and GitLab. All servers include stateful firewalls at no additional cost, networking capabilities, APIs, and CLI tools.
SourceInfracost: Will the estimate match my cloud bill?
No. It is list price. Committed use discounts, enterprise agreements and reserved instances need SKU-level overrides that sit in the Enterprise tier.
Hetzner Cloud: Where are Hetzner Cloud servers located?
Hetzner Cloud servers are available in Germany, Finland, Singapore, and the USA, with data centers in Falkenstein, Nuremberg, Helsinki, Hillsboro (Oregon), Ashburn (Virginia), and Singapore.
SourceInfracost: Why do my S3 and Lambda resources show no cost?
Usage-based resources need monthly usage values supplied in a usage file or defined centrally. Without them they estimate at zero, which is the documented behaviour and the most common way the tool misleads.
Hetzner Cloud: What uptime guarantee does Hetzner Cloud provide?
Hetzner Cloud provides an SLA with 99.9% guaranteed uptime and clearly defined credits in case of malfunction. They also offer 24/7 support by email for business-critical workloads.
SourceInfracost: Has the licence ever changed?
No. The command line tool has been Apache 2.0 throughout, with no Business Source or AGPL episode, which is unusual in this category.
Infracost: What is a run?
Not defined on the public pricing page, and the run allowance is what separates the free and Starter tiers, so establish the definition before choosing between them.
Related pages
More on Hetzner Cloud
Other head to heads
- Hetzner Cloud vs DigitalOcean
- Hetzner Cloud vs Contabo
- Hetzner Cloud vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Hetzner Cloud vs Grafana Cloud
- Hetzner Cloud vs Neon
- Hetzner Cloud vs Linode
- Hetzner Cloud vs Vultr
- Hetzner Cloud vs Scaleway
- Hetzner Cloud vs Wasabi
- Hetzner Cloud vs Zeabur
- Hetzner Cloud vs Encore
- Hetzner Cloud vs Google Cloud Platform
- Hetzner Cloud vs Vagrant
- Hetzner Cloud vs VictoriaMetrics
- Hetzner Cloud vs Akamai
- Hetzner Cloud vs Alibaba Cloud
- Hetzner Cloud vs Buildah
- Hetzner Cloud vs Terragrunt
- Hetzner Cloud vs Pulumi
- Hetzner Cloud vs Packer
- Hetzner Cloud vs Serverless Framework
- Hetzner Cloud vs SST
- Hetzner Cloud vs Coolify
- Hetzner Cloud vs CapRover
- Hetzner Cloud vs DeepInfra
- Hetzner Cloud vs Chef
- Hetzner Cloud vs Cilium
- Hetzner Cloud vs containerd
- Infracost vs DigitalOcean
- Infracost vs Contabo
- Infracost vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Infracost vs Grafana Cloud
- Infracost vs Neon
- Infracost vs Linode
- Infracost vs Vultr
- Infracost vs Scaleway
- Infracost vs Wasabi
- Infracost vs Zeabur
- Infracost vs Encore
- Infracost vs Google Cloud Platform
- Infracost vs Vagrant
- Infracost vs VictoriaMetrics
- Infracost vs Akamai
- Infracost vs Alibaba Cloud
- Infracost vs Buildah
- Infracost vs Terragrunt
- Infracost vs Pulumi
- Infracost vs Packer
- Infracost vs Serverless Framework
- Infracost vs SST
- Infracost vs Coolify
- Infracost vs CapRover
- Infracost vs DeepInfra
- Infracost vs Chef
- Infracost vs Cilium
- Infracost vs containerd

