Cloud · head to head
Vagrant vs Vultr
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Vagrant vagrant 2.4.3 and later is licensed under the Business Source License 1.1 with IBM Corporation as licensor, not an OSI open source licence; Vultr vultr Cloud Compute pricing as captured 31 December 2022 started at $5/month (1 vCPU, 1GB RAM, 25GB storage, 1TB transfer), scaling to $10/month and $20/month with more vCPU/RAM/storage; bandwidth overage billed at $0.01 to $0.05 per GB depending on plan
- They diverge on capability: Vagrant covers Box management, Vultr covers Cloud servers.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Vagrant and Vultr actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cloud).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Vagrant
- Box management
- Provider support
- Multi-machine setups
- Provisioners
- Networking
- Synced folders
- Snapshots
- Plugins
Only in Vultr
- Cloud servers
- Bare metal servers
- Block storage
- Object storage
- Load balancers
- Kubernetes
- Firewalls
- Private networks
Both cover
- Ansible
- Cloud deployment
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Vagrant
- Reproducible local development environments defined in a Vagrantfilenot Vultr
- Provisioning identical VMs across VirtualBox, VMware and Hyper-V for a teamnot Vultr
- Sandboxing multi-machine setups on a developer laptopnot Vultr
Vultr
- High performance computingnot Vagrant
- Game serversnot Vagrant
- Streamingnot Vagrant
- Database hostingnot Vagrant
- Application serversnot Vagrant
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Vagrant
- Vagrant 2.4.3 and later is licensed under the Business Source License 1.1 with IBM Corporation as licensor, not an OSI open source licence
- The Additional Use Grant forbids offering Vagrant to third parties on a hosted or embedded basis in a paid product that competes with IBM's paid versions of Vagrant
- Each version converts to the MPL 2.0 Change License only four years after that version is first published
- Uses that fall outside the Additional Use Grant require a separately negotiated licence from the licensor
Vultr
- Vultr Cloud Compute pricing as captured 31 December 2022 started at $5/month (1 vCPU, 1GB RAM, 25GB storage, 1TB transfer), scaling to $10/month and $20/month with more vCPU/RAM/storage; bandwidth overage billed at $0.01 to $0.05 per GB depending on plan
Pricing, plan by plan
Vagrant
Free- Open SourceFree
- Development environment provisioning
- Multiple providers
- Provisioner support
Vultr
Free- Cloud Compute$2.5/month
- 512MB RAM
- 10GB SSD
- 500GB bandwidth
- Bare Metal$32/month
- Dedicated hardware
- High performance
- Full root access
Which should you pick?
Choose Vagrant if
- You need box management.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Windows, Mac.
- You also want provider support.
Choose Vultr if
- You need cloud servers.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Api, Cli.
- You also want bare metal servers.
Questions people ask
- Is Vagrant or Vultr better?
- Neither clearly leads. Vagrant starts at Free and Vultr at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Vagrant or Vultr?
- Vagrant starts at Free and Vultr at Free.
- Does Vagrant or Vultr run on more platforms?
- Vagrant runs on Linux, Windows, Mac. Vultr runs on Web, Api, Cli.
- Can I use Vagrant for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Vagrant best used for?
- Vagrant is most often used for reproducible local development environments defined in a vagrantfile, provisioning identical vms across virtualbox, vmware and hyper-v for a team, sandboxing multi-machine setups on a developer laptop. Of those, reproducible local development environments defined in a vagrantfile and provisioning identical vms across virtualbox, vmware and hyper-v for a team are not what Vultr is typically brought in for.
- What can Vagrant do that Vultr cannot?
- Vagrant covers Box management, Provider support, Multi-machine setups, Provisioners. Vultr covers Cloud servers, Bare metal servers, Block storage, Object storage. Both handle Ansible, Cloud deployment.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Vagrant vs DigitalOcean
- Vagrant vs Neon
- Vagrant vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Vagrant vs Grafana Cloud
- Vagrant vs Pulumi
- Vagrant vs Portworx
- Vagrant vs Serverless Framework
- Vagrant vs Podman
- Vagrant vs Caddy
- Vagrant vs Rancher
- Vagrant vs Infracost
- Vagrant vs Porter
- Vagrant vs SST
- Vagrant vs Tencent Cloud
- Vagrant vs Terragrunt
- Vagrant vs Thanos
- Vagrant vs Zeabur
- Vagrant vs Zipkin
- Vagrant vs Contabo
- Vagrant vs Hetzner Cloud
- Vagrant vs Linode
- Vagrant vs Scaleway
- Vagrant vs Encore
- Vagrant vs Google Cloud Platform
- Vagrant vs Microsoft Azure
- Vultr vs DigitalOcean
- Vultr vs Neon
- Vultr vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Vultr vs Grafana Cloud
- Vultr vs Pulumi
- Vultr vs Portworx
- Vultr vs Serverless Framework
- Vultr vs Podman
- Vultr vs Caddy
- Vultr vs Rancher
- Vultr vs Infracost
- Vultr vs Porter
- Vultr vs SST
- Vultr vs Tencent Cloud
- Vultr vs Terragrunt
- Vultr vs Thanos
- Vultr vs Zeabur
- Vultr vs Zipkin
- Vultr vs Contabo
- Vultr vs Hetzner Cloud
- Vultr vs Linode
- Vultr vs Scaleway
- Vultr vs Encore
- Vultr vs Google Cloud Platform
- Vultr vs Microsoft Azure


