Cloud · head to head
Hetzner Cloud vs Zipkin
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Hetzner Cloud cost-Optimized plans are shown as currently unavailable; Zipkin less active development and smaller community momentum than Jaeger
- They diverge on capability: Hetzner Cloud covers Cloud servers, Zipkin covers Trace collection and search.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Hetzner Cloud and Zipkin actually diverge.
| Attribute | Hetzner Cloud | Zipkin |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | usage-based | Open source, no licence fee |
| Platforms | Web, Api, Cli | Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Self-hosted |
| Founded | 1997 | Unknown |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cloud).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Hetzner Cloud
- Cloud servers
- Block storage
- Object storage
- Load balancers
- Networks
- Firewalls
- Floating IPs
- Backups
Only in Zipkin
- Trace collection and search
- Dependency diagram
- Simple deployment
- Pluggable storage
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Hetzner Cloud
- Low-cost virtual servers for development and testingnot Zipkin
- European hosting with data held in Germany or Finlandnot Zipkin
- Workloads with heavy egress, where included traffic mattersnot Zipkin
- Self-hosting applications away from the hyperscalersnot Zipkin
Zipkin
- Adding distributed tracing quickly without standing up heavy infrastructurenot Hetzner Cloud
- Java and Spring Boot estates, where instrumentation support is long-establishednot Hetzner Cloud
- Small deployments where Jaeger is more than the problem requiresnot Hetzner Cloud
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Hetzner Cloud
- Cost-Optimized plans are shown as currently unavailable
- The shared-resource tiers are positioned for variable usage and development rather than sustained production workloads
- Regions are limited to Germany, Finland, the United States and Singapore, so latency to other markets is a real constraint
- The uptime guarantee is 99.9 percent, below what the large hyperscalers offer on comparable services
- Support is 24/7 by email, without a phone channel
Zipkin
- Less active development and smaller community momentum than Jaeger
- Fewer features: sampling, storage options and UI are all more limited
- The interface is dated and slower to work with on large trace volumes
- Tracing alone still leaves metrics and logs in separate tools during an incident
Pricing, plan by plan
Hetzner Cloud
Free- CX11$3.29/month
- 1 vCPU
- 1GB RAM
- 25GB SSD
- CX21$6.59/month
- 2 vCPU
- 4GB RAM
- 40GB SSD
Zipkin
Free- ZipkinFree
- Full functionality
- No usage limits
- Community support
Which should you pick?
Choose Hetzner Cloud if
- You need cloud servers.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Api, Cli.
- You also want block storage.
Choose Zipkin if
- You need trace collection and search.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Self-hosted.
- You also want dependency diagram.
Questions people ask
- Is Hetzner Cloud or Zipkin better?
- Neither clearly leads. Hetzner Cloud starts at Free and Zipkin at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Hetzner Cloud or Zipkin?
- Hetzner Cloud starts at Free and Zipkin at Free.
- Does Hetzner Cloud or Zipkin run on more platforms?
- Hetzner Cloud runs on Web, Api, Cli. Zipkin runs on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Self-hosted.
- Can I use Hetzner Cloud for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Hetzner Cloud best used for?
- Hetzner Cloud is most often used for low-cost virtual servers for development and testing, european hosting with data held in germany or finland, workloads with heavy egress, where included traffic matters, self-hosting applications away from the hyperscalers. Of those, low-cost virtual servers for development and testing and european hosting with data held in germany or finland are not what Zipkin is typically brought in for.
- What can Hetzner Cloud do that Zipkin cannot?
- Hetzner Cloud covers Cloud servers, Block storage, Object storage, Load balancers. Zipkin covers Trace collection and search, Dependency diagram, Simple deployment, Pluggable storage.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Hetzner Cloud: What types of cloud plans does Hetzner Cloud offer?
Hetzner Cloud offers Shared Resource plans (Cost-Optimized and Regular Performance) for development and testing, and Dedicated Resource plans (General Purpose) for business applications. Plans are available with a price calculator on their website.
SourceZipkin: Is Zipkin free?
Yes, open source with no licence fee.
Hetzner Cloud: What is included with Hetzner Cloud servers?
Every cloud server comes with free one-click apps like Docker, WordPress, Nextcloud, and GitLab. All servers include stateful firewalls at no additional cost, networking capabilities, APIs, and CLI tools.
SourceZipkin: Zipkin or Jaeger?
Jaeger has more momentum, more features and CNCF backing. Zipkin is lighter and quicker to stand up, and remains well supported in the Java and Spring ecosystem.
Hetzner Cloud: Where are Hetzner Cloud servers located?
Hetzner Cloud servers are available in Germany, Finland, Singapore, and the USA, with data centers in Falkenstein, Nuremberg, Helsinki, Hillsboro (Oregon), Ashburn (Virginia), and Singapore.
SourceZipkin: Does Zipkin work with OpenTelemetry?
Yes. OpenTelemetry can export to Zipkin, which is now the usual way to instrument for it.
Hetzner Cloud: What uptime guarantee does Hetzner Cloud provide?
Hetzner Cloud provides an SLA with 99.9% guaranteed uptime and clearly defined credits in case of malfunction. They also offer 24/7 support by email for business-critical workloads.
SourceRelated pages
More on Hetzner Cloud
Other head to heads
- Hetzner Cloud vs DigitalOcean
- Hetzner Cloud vs Contabo
- Hetzner Cloud vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Hetzner Cloud vs Grafana Cloud
- Hetzner Cloud vs Neon
- Hetzner Cloud vs Linode
- Hetzner Cloud vs Vultr
- Hetzner Cloud vs Scaleway
- Hetzner Cloud vs Wasabi
- Hetzner Cloud vs Zeabur
- Hetzner Cloud vs Encore
- Hetzner Cloud vs Google Cloud Platform
- Hetzner Cloud vs Vagrant
- Hetzner Cloud vs VictoriaMetrics
- Hetzner Cloud vs Akamai
- Hetzner Cloud vs Alibaba Cloud
- Hetzner Cloud vs Buildah
- Hetzner Cloud vs Jaeger
- Hetzner Cloud vs Deno Deploy
- Hetzner Cloud vs Anyscale
- Hetzner Cloud vs Cerebrium
- Hetzner Cloud vs Go
- Hetzner Cloud vs Orca Security
- Hetzner Cloud vs Heroku
- Hetzner Cloud vs Vault
- Hetzner Cloud vs Beam Cloud
- Hetzner Cloud vs Caddy
- Hetzner Cloud vs DeepInfra
- Hetzner Cloud vs OpenTelemetry
- Hetzner Cloud vs Thanos
- Hetzner Cloud vs Linkerd
- Hetzner Cloud vs Longhorn
- Zipkin vs DigitalOcean
- Zipkin vs Contabo
- Zipkin vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Zipkin vs Grafana Cloud
- Zipkin vs Neon
- Zipkin vs Linode
- Zipkin vs Vultr
- Zipkin vs Scaleway
- Zipkin vs Wasabi
- Zipkin vs Zeabur
- Zipkin vs Encore
- Zipkin vs Google Cloud Platform
- Zipkin vs Vagrant
- Zipkin vs VictoriaMetrics
- Zipkin vs Akamai
- Zipkin vs Alibaba Cloud
- Zipkin vs Buildah
- Zipkin vs Jaeger
- Zipkin vs Deno Deploy
- Zipkin vs Anyscale
- Zipkin vs Cerebrium
- Zipkin vs Go
- Zipkin vs Orca Security
- Zipkin vs Heroku
- Zipkin vs Vault
- Zipkin vs Beam Cloud
- Zipkin vs Caddy
- Zipkin vs DeepInfra
- Zipkin vs OpenTelemetry
- Zipkin vs Thanos
- Zipkin vs Linkerd
- Zipkin vs Longhorn


