AI · head to head
Helicone vs Jaeger
Helicone
AI
Open-source LLM observability and gateway platform for AI applications
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Helicone the free Hobby plan is capped at 10,000 requests per month, which teams with production traffic can exceed quickly.; Jaeger tracing is only as good as the instrumentation, and partial instrumentation produces misleading gaps
- They diverge on capability: Helicone covers Request dashboard and tracking, Jaeger covers Distributed trace search.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Helicone and Jaeger actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Helicone
- Request dashboard and tracking
- Sessions and segments
- Helicone Query Language (HQL)
- Prompt datasets and improvement
- Playground
- Rate limits and alerts
Only in Jaeger
- Distributed trace search
- Dependency graph
- Adaptive sampling
- Pluggable storage
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Helicone
- Monitoring cost and latency of production LLM applicationsnot Jaeger
- Debugging multi-step agent sessionsnot Jaeger
- Managing and iterating on prompts across a teamnot Jaeger
- Routing requests across multiple LLM providersnot Jaeger
Jaeger
- Finding which service in a request path causes the latencynot Helicone
- Understanding real service dependencies rather than the diagram on the wikinot Helicone
- Debugging failures that only appear under production traffic patternsnot Helicone
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Helicone
- The free Hobby plan is capped at 10,000 requests per month, which teams with production traffic can exceed quickly.
- Advanced compliance features like SOC 2 and HIPAA are only available starting at the $799/month Team plan.
- Usage beyond the free tier is billed on top of the base subscription, adding cost unpredictability at scale.
- On-premises deployment is restricted to the custom Enterprise tier.
Jaeger
- Tracing is only as good as the instrumentation, and partial instrumentation produces misleading gaps
- Storage is the real operational cost: high-volume tracing on Elasticsearch or Cassandra is a cluster to run and pay for
- Traces alone, without correlated metrics and logs, leave you switching between tools during an incident
Pricing, plan by plan
Helicone
Free- HobbyFree
- 10,000 free requests
- 1 GB storage
- 1 seat
- Pro$79/month
- 10K free requests included, usage-based beyond
- 7-day free trial
- Unlimited playgrounds and workspaces
- Team$799/month
- 5 organizations
- SOC 2 and HIPAA compliance
- Dedicated Slack channel access
- Enterprise$undefined/mo
- Custom MSAs and SAML SSO
- On-premises deployment
- Bulk cloud discounts
Jaeger
Free- JaegerFree
- Full functionality
- No usage limits
- Community support
Which should you pick?
Choose Helicone if
- You need request dashboard and tracking.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on web, api.
- You also want sessions and segments.
Choose Jaeger if
- You need distributed trace search.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Kubernetes, Docker.
- You also want dependency graph.
Questions people ask
- Is Helicone or Jaeger better?
- Neither clearly leads. Helicone starts at Free and Jaeger at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Helicone or Jaeger?
- Helicone starts at Free and Jaeger at Free.
- Does Helicone or Jaeger run on more platforms?
- Helicone runs on web, api. Jaeger runs on Linux, Kubernetes, Docker.
- Can I use Helicone for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Helicone best used for?
- Helicone is most often used for monitoring cost and latency of production llm applications, debugging multi-step agent sessions, managing and iterating on prompts across a team, routing requests across multiple llm providers. Of those, monitoring cost and latency of production llm applications and debugging multi-step agent sessions are not what Jaeger is typically brought in for.
- What can Helicone do that Jaeger cannot?
- Helicone covers Request dashboard and tracking, Sessions and segments, Helicone Query Language (HQL), Prompt datasets and improvement. Jaeger covers Distributed trace search, Dependency graph, Adaptive sampling, Pluggable storage.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Helicone: What does Helicone cost?
Helicone offers a free Hobby plan, a Pro plan at $79/month, a Team plan at $799/month, and custom Enterprise pricing, with usage-based charges applying beyond included request limits.
SourceJaeger: Is Jaeger free?
Yes, open source and CNCF-graduated. Costs are the storage backend you run.
Helicone: Is there a free plan, and what are its limits?
The free Hobby plan includes 10,000 requests per month, 1 GB of storage, 1 seat, and 1 organization, aimed at kickstarting AI projects.
SourceJaeger: Do I use Jaeger or OpenTelemetry?
Both, usually. Instrument with OpenTelemetry and use Jaeger to store and query the traces.
Helicone: Are there discounts available?
Helicone offers 50% off the first year for qualifying startups, discounts for non-profits, a $100 annual credit for open-source projects, and free access for students.
SourceJaeger: Does Jaeger handle metrics and logs?
No. It is a tracing system. Metrics and logs need Prometheus, Loki or an equivalent.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Helicone vs PromptLayer
- Helicone vs Arize AI
- Helicone vs Galileo
- Helicone vs Together AI
- Helicone vs Stable Diffusion
- Helicone vs AutoGen
- Helicone vs LangGraph
- Helicone vs Aider
- Helicone vs Sourcegraph Cody
- Helicone vs Tabnine
- Helicone vs Amazon Q Developer
- Helicone vs Replicate
- Helicone vs Gumloop
- Helicone vs Inflection AI
- Helicone vs LatchBio
- Helicone vs LOVO
- Helicone vs Manus
- Helicone vs Modal
- Helicone vs Zipkin
- Helicone vs Grafana Cloud
- Helicone vs VictoriaMetrics
- Helicone vs Fastly
- Helicone vs HAProxy
- Helicone vs Anyscale
- Helicone vs Proxmox VE
- Helicone vs Rancher
- Helicone vs OpenEBS
- Helicone vs DeepInfra
- Helicone vs Go
- Helicone vs Packer
- Helicone vs Caddy
- Helicone vs Cerebrium
- Helicone vs K3s
- Jaeger vs PromptLayer
- Jaeger vs Arize AI
- Jaeger vs Galileo
- Jaeger vs Together AI
- Jaeger vs Stable Diffusion
- Jaeger vs AutoGen
- Jaeger vs LangGraph
- Jaeger vs Aider
- Jaeger vs Sourcegraph Cody
- Jaeger vs Tabnine
- Jaeger vs Amazon Q Developer
- Jaeger vs Replicate
- Jaeger vs Gumloop
- Jaeger vs Inflection AI
- Jaeger vs LatchBio
- Jaeger vs LOVO
- Jaeger vs Manus
- Jaeger vs Modal
- Jaeger vs Zipkin
- Jaeger vs Grafana Cloud
- Jaeger vs VictoriaMetrics
- Jaeger vs Fastly
- Jaeger vs HAProxy
- Jaeger vs Anyscale
- Jaeger vs Proxmox VE
- Jaeger vs Rancher
- Jaeger vs OpenEBS
- Jaeger vs DeepInfra
- Jaeger vs Go
- Jaeger vs Packer
- Jaeger vs Caddy
- Jaeger vs Cerebrium
- Jaeger vs K3s

