Technology · head to head
Heap vs Zeta

Zeta
Technology
Cloud native credit card processing and core banking from Bhavin Turakhia's Zeta
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Heap has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Heap no built-in A/B testing or feature flags; requires integration with separate tools for experimentation; Zeta it competes against card processors with decades of production track record, and in card processing an outage is a public event, so a shorter operational history is a genuine risk factor rather than a technicality.
- They diverge on capability: Heap covers Autocapture, Zeta covers Tachyon card processing.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Heap and Zeta actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Technology).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Heap
- Autocapture
- Retroactive analytics
- Session replay
- Funnel analysis
- User segmentation
- Path analysis
- Data science
- Virtual events
Only in Zeta
- Tachyon card processing
- Real time authorisation
- Rewards and offers engine
- Core banking modules
- Programme configuration
- Mobile and web SDKs
- Fraud and controls
Both cover
- Cloud deployment
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Heap
- User behavior analysisnot Zeta
- Conversion optimizationnot Zeta
- Product adoptionnot Zeta
- Customer journey mappingnot Zeta
- A/B testing analysisnot Zeta
Zeta
- A United States bank whose card platform makes launching a new rewards product a multi quarter vendor projectnot Heap
- An issuer that wants authorisation level controls and real time data rather than end of day filesnot Heap
- A large fintech launching a credit card programme at scale with custom product logicnot Heap
- A bank consolidating card and deposit processing onto one modern platformnot Heap
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Heap
- No built-in A/B testing or feature flags; requires integration with separate tools for experimentation
- Group analytics and advanced features require a sales conversation, not self-serve
- Cloud-only deployment; no self-hosted option for data security or compliance requirements
- Session replay lacks developer debugging tools compared to PostHog
- Pricing for Growth and Pro plans requires direct sales contact; no transparency on how pricing scales
Zeta
- It competes against card processors with decades of production track record, and in card processing an outage is a public event, so a shorter operational history is a genuine risk factor rather than a technicality.
- Contracts are enterprise scale and quoted with volume minimums, which puts it out of reach of small issuers who would otherwise benefit most from modern tooling.
- A card portfolio migration runs twelve to twenty four months at minimum, during which the issuer runs two platforms and pays for both.
- Zeta is a processor rather than a licence holder, so network membership, BIN sponsorship and regulatory obligations remain entirely with the issuer.
- Public references for large live United States production volumes are fewer than the announcements imply, so diligence should insist on active account counts and uptime history rather than partnership press releases.
Pricing, plan by plan
Heap
Free- FreeFree
- Up to 10,000 monthly sessions
- Basic charts
- 6 months data history
- Growth$undefined/custom
- Custom session pricing
- Sense AI assistant
- 12 months data history
- Pro$undefined/custom
- Custom session pricing
- Account analytics
- Engagement matrix
- Premier$undefined/custom
- Custom session pricing
- Data warehouse integration
- Unlimited projects
Zeta
On request- Tachyon platform$undefined/year
- Quoted per institution, commonly on active accounts or transaction volume
- Implementation for a card portfolio migration measured in quarters to years
- Minimum volume commitments typical on enterprise contracts
Which should you pick?
Choose Heap if
- You need autocapture.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want retroactive analytics.
Choose Zeta if
- You need tachyon card processing.
- You work on Web, API, Cloud, iOS, Android.
- You also want real time authorisation.
Questions people ask
- Is Heap or Zeta better?
- Neither clearly leads. Heap starts at Free and Zeta at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Heap or Zeta?
- Heap has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Heap and On request for Zeta.
- Does Heap or Zeta run on more platforms?
- Heap runs on Web, iOS, Android. Zeta runs on Web, API, Cloud, iOS, Android.
- Can I use Heap for free?
- Yes. Heap has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Zeta starts at On request.
- What is Heap best used for?
- Heap is most often used for user behavior analysis, conversion optimization, product adoption, customer journey mapping. Of those, user behavior analysis and conversion optimization are not what Zeta is typically brought in for.
- What can Heap do that Zeta cannot?
- Heap covers Autocapture, Retroactive analytics, Session replay, Funnel analysis. Zeta covers Tachyon card processing, Real time authorisation, Rewards and offers engine, Core banking modules. Both handle Cloud deployment.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Heap: What does Heap's autocapture feature do?
Heap's autocapture is a single code snippet that automatically captures every click, swipe, tap, pageview, and form fill on your website and apps without requiring manual event setup. Once installed, Heap captures the entire digital experience of every user on every platform with no ongoing engineering maintenance needed.
SourceZeta: Which Zeta is this?
The banking technology company founded by Bhavin Turakhia, which builds the Tachyon card processing and core banking platform. Not any similarly named payroll or accounting product.
Heap: What are Heap's pricing plans and how much do they cost?
Heap offers a Free plan for up to 10,000 monthly sessions. Growth, Pro, and Premier plans use custom session-based pricing that requires contacting sales for a quote. Free includes basic charts and 6 months data history. Growth adds the Sense AI assistant. Pro adds account analytics. Premier adds data warehouse integration and dedicated customer success management.
SourceZeta: What is its strongest use case?
United States credit card issuing and processing, where legacy platforms make product changes slow and expensive.
Heap: Does Heap include session replay and A/B testing?
Heap includes integrated session replay showing exactly what users did on your site. However, Heap does not include built-in A/B testing or feature flags. Teams requiring these capabilities must use separate tools or integrate with third-party platforms.
SourceZeta: Does Zeta provide the BIN or licence?
No. It processes. Network membership, BIN sponsorship and regulatory obligations stay with the issuer.
Heap: What integrations does Heap support?
Heap supports over 100 integrations connecting to business tools including marketing platforms, CRMs, and data warehouses. This allows insights to reach relevant teams and ensures data flows to other business systems automatically.
SourceHeap: Does Heap offer self-hosting or is it cloud-only?
Heap is cloud-only and does not offer self-hosted options. Organizations requiring on-premises deployment should consider alternatives like PostHog which supports self-hosting alongside its cloud product.
SourceHeap: What is Sense and how does it help with analytics?
Sense Chat is Heap's AI assistant that enables users to access analytics without extensive technical knowledge. It allows teams to ask questions about user behavior and get answers directly without lengthy onboarding or technical expertise, making insights more accessible to non-technical stakeholders.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Heap vs Mixpanel
- Heap vs PostHog
- Heap vs Amplitude
- Heap vs Pendo
- Heap vs Userpilot
- Heap vs Segment
- Heap vs RescueTime
- Heap vs Lovable
- Heap vs Coda
- Heap vs Istio
- Heap vs Linear
- Heap vs Terraform
- Heap vs Intercom
- Heap vs LaunchDarkly
- Heap vs Monday.com
- Heap vs Finxact
- Heap vs Thought Machine
- Heap vs Alkami
- Heap vs Apache Spark
- Heap vs Nagios XI
- Heap vs Shortcut
- Heap vs Datadog
- Heap vs Greenhouse
- Heap vs Google Chrome
- Heap vs Mozilla Firefox
- Heap vs Confluent Cloud
- Heap vs Maze
- Heap vs Microsoft Outlook
- Heap vs PagerDuty
- Heap vs PyCharm
- Heap vs Sketch
- Heap vs Sublime Text
- Zeta vs Mixpanel
- Zeta vs PostHog
- Zeta vs Amplitude
- Zeta vs Pendo
- Zeta vs Userpilot
- Zeta vs Segment
- Zeta vs RescueTime
- Zeta vs Lovable
- Zeta vs Coda
- Zeta vs Istio
- Zeta vs Linear
- Zeta vs Terraform
- Zeta vs Intercom
- Zeta vs LaunchDarkly
- Zeta vs Monday.com
- Zeta vs Finxact
- Zeta vs Thought Machine
- Zeta vs Alkami
- Zeta vs Apache Spark
- Zeta vs Nagios XI
- Zeta vs Shortcut
- Zeta vs Datadog
- Zeta vs Greenhouse
- Zeta vs Google Chrome
- Zeta vs Mozilla Firefox
- Zeta vs Confluent Cloud
- Zeta vs Maze
- Zeta vs Microsoft Outlook
- Zeta vs PagerDuty
- Zeta vs PyCharm
- Zeta vs Sketch
- Zeta vs Sublime Text

