Logging · head to head
Healthchecks vs Logz.io
The short version
- Only Healthchecks has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Healthchecks free tier limited to 20 jobs, restricting scale for small teams; Logz.io saaS-only with no self-hosting option
- They diverge on capability: Healthchecks covers Ping URL monitoring, Logz.io covers Log aggregation.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 2 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Healthchecks and Logz.io actually diverge.
| Attribute | Healthchecks | Logz.io |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | $99/month |
| Pricing model | Per-job monitoring with fixed tiers | Unknown |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Web, API | Cloud (SaaS), Web |
| Founded | 2015 | 2014 |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Logging).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Healthchecks
- Ping URL monitoring
- Customizable schedules
- Event logs
- Status badges
- Email alerts
- SMS and phone alerts
- Multiple integrations
Only in Logz.io
- Log aggregation
- AI-powered insights
- Elasticsearch integration
- Alert management
- Security analytics
- API
- Webhooks
- REST
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Healthchecks
- Monitoring cron jobs that run on schedulesnot Logz.io
- Alerting teams when background tasks failnot Logz.io
- Tracking Kubernetes CronJob execution healthnot Logz.io
- Monitoring Jenkins builds and deploymentsnot Logz.io
Logz.io
- Log monitoringnot Healthchecks
- Application performancenot Healthchecks
- Security analyticsnot Healthchecks
- Troubleshootingnot Healthchecks
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Healthchecks
- Free tier limited to 20 jobs, restricting scale for small teams
- Requires explicit ping integration into each job
- No workflow orchestration or job scheduling capabilities
- SMS and phone credits consumed separately on paid plans
- Limited to ping-based detection without deep job introspection
Logz.io
- SaaS-only with no self-hosting option
- High pricing for long data retention periods, with steep cost increases for larger data volumes
- UI can take up to 10 seconds to load
- Geo-location data is old and inaccurate
- Expensive for smaller companies with limited log volumes
- Data retention limitations at 14 days may not meet compliance requirements
Pricing, plan by plan
Healthchecks
Free- HobbyistFree
- Monitor 20 jobs
- 100 log entries per job
- Email alerts
- Supporter$5/month
- Monitor 20 jobs
- 100 log entries per job
- Support the service financially
- Business$20/month
- Monitor 100 jobs
- 1000 log entries per job
- 50 SMS and WhatsApp credits
- Business Plus$80/month
- Monitor 1000 jobs
- 1000 log entries per job
- 500 SMS and WhatsApp credits
Logz.io
$99/month- Pro$99/month
- Log management
- Real-time search
- Basic alerts
- Enterprise$undefined/mo
- All Pro features
- Advanced security
- Dedicated support
Which should you pick?
Choose Healthchecks if
- You need ping url monitoring.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, API.
- You also want customizable schedules.
Choose Logz.io if
- You need log aggregation.
- You work on Cloud (SaaS), Web.
- You also want ai-powered insights.
Questions people ask
- Is Healthchecks or Logz.io better?
- Neither clearly leads. Healthchecks starts at Free and Logz.io at $99/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Healthchecks or Logz.io?
- Healthchecks has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Healthchecks and $99/month for Logz.io.
- Does Healthchecks or Logz.io run on more platforms?
- Healthchecks runs on Web, API. Logz.io runs on Cloud (SaaS), Web.
- Can I use Healthchecks for free?
- Yes. Healthchecks has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Logz.io starts at $99/month.
- What is Healthchecks best used for?
- Healthchecks is most often used for monitoring cron jobs that run on schedules, alerting teams when background tasks fail, tracking kubernetes cronjob execution health, monitoring jenkins builds and deployments. Of those, monitoring cron jobs that run on schedules and alerting teams when background tasks fail are not what Logz.io is typically brought in for.
- What can Healthchecks do that Logz.io cannot?
- Healthchecks covers Ping URL monitoring, Customizable schedules, Event logs, Status badges. Logz.io covers Log aggregation, AI-powered insights, Elasticsearch integration, Alert management.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Healthchecks: What does the free Hobbyist plan include?
The Hobbyist plan ($0/month) includes monitoring for 20 jobs, 100 log entries per job, and email alerts with no credit card required.
SourceLogz.io: Does Logz.io support self-hosting?
No. Logz.io is a fully SaaS platform with no self-hosting option, limiting flexibility for organizations with on-premises requirements or specific data residency needs.
SourceHealthchecks: What is the difference between Business and Business Plus?
Business ($20/month) monitors 100 jobs with 50 SMS credits. Business Plus ($80/month) monitors 1000 jobs with 500 SMS credits and priority support.
SourceLogz.io: Is Logz.io based on open-source ELK Stack?
Logz.io is built on the ELK Stack (Elasticsearch, Logstash, Kibana) but uses managed hosting. Note that Elasticsearch and Kibana switched to non-open-source licenses (SSPL) in February 2021, which may have legal implications.
Healthchecks: Do nonprofits and open-source projects get special pricing?
Yes, open-source projects and nonprofits receive the Business plan at no cost.
SourceRelated pages
More on Healthchecks
Other head to heads
- Healthchecks vs Cronitor
- Healthchecks vs Openstatus
- Healthchecks vs New Relic
- Healthchecks vs FireHydrant
- Healthchecks vs InfluxDB
- Healthchecks vs Checkly
- Healthchecks vs Traceloop
- Healthchecks vs Uptime.com
- Healthchecks vs incident.io
- Healthchecks vs Axiom
- Healthchecks vs Better Stack
- Healthchecks vs Bugsnag
- Healthchecks vs Dynatrace Logs
- Healthchecks vs Elastic
- Healthchecks vs Elastic APM
- Healthchecks vs Elasticsearch Service
- Healthchecks vs ELK Stack
- Healthchecks vs Filebeat
- Healthchecks vs Elastic Stack
- Healthchecks vs Coralogix
- Healthchecks vs Grafana Loki
- Healthchecks vs Humio
- Healthchecks vs Datadog Logs
- Healthchecks vs Rootly
- Healthchecks vs AppDynamics
- Healthchecks vs Fluent Bit
- Logz.io vs Cronitor
- Logz.io vs Openstatus
- Logz.io vs New Relic
- Logz.io vs FireHydrant
- Logz.io vs InfluxDB
- Logz.io vs Checkly
- Logz.io vs Traceloop
- Logz.io vs Uptime.com
- Logz.io vs incident.io
- Logz.io vs Axiom
- Logz.io vs Better Stack
- Logz.io vs Bugsnag
- Logz.io vs Dynatrace Logs
- Logz.io vs Elastic
- Logz.io vs Elastic APM
- Logz.io vs Elasticsearch Service
- Logz.io vs ELK Stack
- Logz.io vs Filebeat
- Logz.io vs Elastic Stack
- Logz.io vs Coralogix
- Logz.io vs Grafana Loki
- Logz.io vs Humio
- Logz.io vs Datadog Logs
- Logz.io vs Rootly
- Logz.io vs AppDynamics
- Logz.io vs Fluent Bit


