Logging · head to head
Datadog Logs vs Logz.io

Datadog Logs
Logging
Log Management and Analytics
- From
- $0.1/per GB ingested per month
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Datadog Logs complex, multi-tiered pricing model based on ingestion, indexing, and storage; can become expensive at scale; Logz.io saaS-only with no self-hosting option
- They diverge on capability: Datadog Logs covers Log ingestion, Logz.io covers Log aggregation.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 2 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Datadog Logs and Logz.io actually diverge.
| Attribute | Datadog Logs | Logz.io |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $0.1/per GB ingested per month | $99/month |
| Pricing model | usage-based | Unknown |
| Platforms | Cloud (AWS, Azure, Google Cloud, Oracle Cloud) | Cloud (SaaS), Web |
| Founded | 2010 | 2014 |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Logging).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Datadog Logs
- Log ingestion
- Full-text search
- Custom dashboards
- Log-based metrics
Only in Logz.io
- Log aggregation
- AI-powered insights
- Elasticsearch integration
- Alert management
- Security analytics
Both cover
- API
- Webhooks
- REST
- Web support
- Api support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Datadog Logs
- Centralised log aggregation and analysisnot Logz.io
- Multi-source log correlation with metrics and tracesnot Logz.io
- Root cause analysis and troubleshootingnot Logz.io
- Security monitoring and threat detectionnot Logz.io
Logz.io
- Log monitoringnot Datadog Logs
- Application performancenot Datadog Logs
- Security analyticsnot Datadog Logs
- Troubleshootingnot Datadog Logs
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Datadog Logs
- Complex, multi-tiered pricing model based on ingestion, indexing, and storage; can become expensive at scale
- Ingestion pricing of $0.10/GB can accumulate rapidly for high-volume logging environments
Logz.io
- SaaS-only with no self-hosting option
- High pricing for long data retention periods, with steep cost increases for larger data volumes
- UI can take up to 10 seconds to load
- Geo-location data is old and inaccurate
- Expensive for smaller companies with limited log volumes
- Data retention limitations at 14 days may not meet compliance requirements
Pricing, plan by plan
Datadog Logs
$0.1/per GB ingested per monthNo published plan breakdown. See the Datadog Logs review.
Logz.io
$99/month- Pro$99/month
- Log management
- Real-time search
- Basic alerts
- Enterprise$undefined/mo
- All Pro features
- Advanced security
- Dedicated support
Which should you pick?
Choose Datadog Logs if
- You need log ingestion.
- You work on Cloud (AWS, Azure, Google Cloud, Oracle Cloud).
- You also want full-text search.
Choose Logz.io if
- You need log aggregation.
- You work on Cloud (SaaS), Web.
- You also want ai-powered insights.
Questions people ask
- Is Datadog Logs or Logz.io better?
- Neither clearly leads. Datadog Logs starts at $0.1/per GB ingested per month and Logz.io at $99/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Datadog Logs or Logz.io?
- Datadog Logs starts at $0.1/per GB ingested per month and Logz.io at $99/month.
- Does Datadog Logs or Logz.io run on more platforms?
- Datadog Logs runs on Cloud (AWS, Azure, Google Cloud, Oracle Cloud). Logz.io runs on Cloud (SaaS), Web.
- What is Datadog Logs best used for?
- Datadog Logs is most often used for centralised log aggregation and analysis, multi-source log correlation with metrics and traces, root cause analysis and troubleshooting, security monitoring and threat detection. Of those, centralised log aggregation and analysis and multi-source log correlation with metrics and traces are not what Logz.io is typically brought in for.
- What can Datadog Logs do that Logz.io cannot?
- Datadog Logs covers Log ingestion, Full-text search, Custom dashboards, Log-based metrics. Logz.io covers Log aggregation, AI-powered insights, Elasticsearch integration, Alert management. Both handle API, Webhooks, REST, Web support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Datadog Logs: What pricing options does Datadog offer for log ingestion and processing?
Log ingestion starts at $0.10/GB (annual billing; $0.10 on-demand). Standard indexing costs $1.70 per million events per month (annual; $2.55 on-demand). Flex Storage costs $0.05/million events stored per month (annual; $0.075 on-demand). Flex Logs Starter costs $0.60/million events stored per month (annual; $0.90 on-demand).
SourceLogz.io: Does Logz.io support self-hosting?
No. Logz.io is a fully SaaS platform with no self-hosting option, limiting flexibility for organizations with on-premises requirements or specific data residency needs.
SourceDatadog Logs: What retention options are available and how does it affect pricing?
Standard indexing offers 15-day retention with options for 3 to 30+ days. Flex Storage supports flexible retention up to 15 months. Flex Logs Starter includes bundled compute for retention of 3-15 months.
SourceLogz.io: Is Logz.io based on open-source ELK Stack?
Logz.io is built on the ELK Stack (Elasticsearch, Logstash, Kibana) but uses managed hosting. Note that Elasticsearch and Kibana switched to non-open-source licenses (SSPL) in February 2021, which may have legal implications.
Datadog Logs: Is there a cost to forward logs to external systems?
Yes, log forwarding costs $0.25/GB outbound per destination for routing logs to external systems.
SourceDatadog Logs: What discounts are available for high-volume customers?
Multi-year and volume discounts are available for customers processing 3B+ events per month.
SourceRelated pages
More on Datadog Logs
Other head to heads
- Datadog Logs vs Dynatrace Logs
- Datadog Logs vs New Relic Logs
- Datadog Logs vs Splunk Enterprise
- Datadog Logs vs Axiom
- Datadog Logs vs Better Stack
- Datadog Logs vs ELK Stack
- Datadog Logs vs Loggly
- Datadog Logs vs Sematext
- Datadog Logs vs Sumo Logic
- Datadog Logs vs Coralogix
- Datadog Logs vs AppDynamics
- Datadog Logs vs Fluent Bit
- Datadog Logs vs Graylog
- Datadog Logs vs Honeybadger
- Datadog Logs vs Filebeat
- Datadog Logs vs Fluentd
- Datadog Logs vs Elastic Stack
- Datadog Logs vs Grafana Loki
- Datadog Logs vs Checkly
- Datadog Logs vs Humio
- Datadog Logs vs InfluxDB
- Datadog Logs vs Rootly
- Datadog Logs vs Elastic
- Datadog Logs vs Elastic APM
- Datadog Logs vs Elasticsearch Service
- Logz.io vs Dynatrace Logs
- Logz.io vs New Relic Logs
- Logz.io vs Splunk Enterprise
- Logz.io vs Axiom
- Logz.io vs Better Stack
- Logz.io vs ELK Stack
- Logz.io vs Loggly
- Logz.io vs Sematext
- Logz.io vs Sumo Logic
- Logz.io vs Coralogix
- Logz.io vs AppDynamics
- Logz.io vs Fluent Bit
- Logz.io vs Graylog
- Logz.io vs Honeybadger
- Logz.io vs Filebeat
- Logz.io vs Fluentd
- Logz.io vs Elastic Stack
- Logz.io vs Grafana Loki
- Logz.io vs Checkly
- Logz.io vs Humio
- Logz.io vs InfluxDB
- Logz.io vs Rootly
- Logz.io vs Elastic
- Logz.io vs Elastic APM
- Logz.io vs Elasticsearch Service

